Frontiers in Psychology,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
13
Опубликована: Авг. 3, 2022
In
the
past
decade,
identification
with
all
humanity
(IWAH)
has
been
found
to
predict
several
positive
behavioral
outcomes
like
volunteering,
a
willingness
contribute
humanitarian
relief,
and
cooperative
health
behavior
during
COVID-19
pandemic.
However,
this
day,
little
is
known
about
how
individual
differences
in
IWAH
emerge.
Therefore,
present
study
aimed
explore
whether
there
relationship
between
individuals’
upbringing
their
IWAH.
For
purpose,
data
on
IWAH,
remembered
parenting
(RPB),
parental
attachment
assessed
by
3056
individuals
(1517
from
Germany
1539
England)
were
analyzed.
Structural
equation
models
used
(A)
analyze
correlations
RPB,
attachment,
(B)
test
single
facets
of
RPB
could
significantly
when
controlling
for
other
latent
regression
analysis.
The
correlated
positively
two
(global
self-definition
global
self-investment)
explained
4.1
7%
variance.
Surprisingly,
English
sample,
negative
also
variance
being
significant
but
small,
it
argued
that
parents’
attitudes
or
specifically
related
have
greater
impact
than
more
unspecific
behavior.
instance,
we
discovered
extent
which
participants
perceived
parents
as
citizens
one
third
own
citizens.
Fostering
constitute
an
effective
approach
tackle
important
challenges.
research
needed
generalizability
results
further
roots
people’s
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
9, С. e40201 - e40201
Опубликована: Дек. 5, 2022
During
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
infodemic
spread
even
more
rapidly
than
pandemic
itself.
The
vaccine
hesitancy
has
been
prevalent
worldwide
and
hindered
exiting
strategies.
Misinformation
around
vaccines
is
a
vital
contributor
to
hesitancy.
However,
no
evidence
systematically
summarized
misinformation.
Journal of Infection and Public Health,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
16(3), С. 441 - 466
Опубликована: Янв. 30, 2023
Globally,
increasing
coronavirus
disease
(COVID-19)
vaccination
coverage
remains
a
major
public
health
concern
in
the
face
of
high
rates
COVID-19
hesitancy
among
general
population.
We
must
understand
impact
determinants
vaccine
uptake
when
designing
national
programmes.
aimed
to
synthesise
nationwide
evidence
regarding
infodemics
and
demographic,
psychological,
social
predictors
uptake.
systematically
searched
seven
databases
between
July
2021
March
2022
retrieve
relevant
articles
published
since
was
first
reported
on
31
December
2019
Wuhan,
China.
Of
12,502
peer-reviewed
retrieved
from
databases,
57
met
selection
criteria
were
included
this
systematic
review.
explored
before
after
roll-out
by
Food
Drug
Authority
(FDA).
Increased
associated
with
decreased
hesitancy.
Concerns
about
safety,
negative
side
effects,
rapid
development
vaccine,
uncertainty
effectiveness
reluctance
be
vaccinated.
After
US
FDA
approval
vaccines,
phobia
medical
procedures
such
as
injection
inadequate
information
vaccines
main
Addressing
safety
concerns
well
providing
adequate
impacts
pandemics,
should
considered
implementation
any
programme.
Reassuring
people
using
alternative
needle-free
may
help
further
increase
Journal of Social Issues,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
81(1)
Опубликована: Фев. 18, 2025
ABSTRACT
Amid
historically
low
societal
trust
in
science,
four
cross‐sectional
studies
(
N
=
3856)
reveal
a
link
between
generic
science
denial
and
national
narcissism.
The
findings
support
the
pre‐registered
hypotheses
that
(1)
narcissism
(a
desire
for
recognition)
ingroup
satisfaction
(pride
value)
have
opposite
unique
associations
with
(rejection
of
scientific
consensus
generalized
suspicion
toward
experts)
(2)
indirect
specific
outcomes
during
COVID‐19
pandemic
beyond
(climate
change
denial,
anti‐vaccination
attitude,
unregulated
“alternative”
medicine).
After
their
common
variance
is
controlled,
positively
associated
its
outcomes,
while
negatively.
National
was
strongest
predictor
surpassing
other
established
predictors
such
as
education
political
conservatism.
Studies
1
2
showed
additionally,
vulnerable
narcissistic
personality
second
demonstrating
first
time,
need
to
be
recognized
better
than
others
underlies
denial.
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
27(5), С. 1027 - 1049
Опубликована: Апрель 30, 2024
Collective
narcissism
is
a
belief
that
the
ingroup
deserves
but
denied
special
treatment
and
recognition.
It
projection
of
narcissistic
need
to
be
recognized
as
better
than
others
on
social
level
self.
an
aspect
identification,
one
ways
group
members
favour
their
ingroup.
National
associated
with
collective
advantaged
national
subgroups
(e.g.,
Whites,
men).
groups
similarly
predict
discrimination
disadvantaged
racial
minorities,
women)
legitimization
group-based
inequality.
Members
who
endorse
internalize
beliefs
legitimizing
Ultraconservative
populists
propagate
undermine
political
system
does
not
sufficiently
serve
interests
groups.
predicts
patriotism
nationalism.
Once
three
forms
favouritism
are
differentiated,
it
becomes
clear
come
at
expense
nationalism,
discrimination,
societal
polarization,
or
erosion
democracy.
Instead,
may
remedy
against
them.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
50(4), С. 495 - 515
Опубликована: Ноя. 30, 2022
National
narcissism
and
national
identification,
two
distinct
types
of
commitment,
differ
in
terms
their
psychological
concomitants.
Therefore,
the
current
article,
we
hypothesized
that
they
would
also
relate
to
different
adult
attachment
styles.
Namely,
proposed
be
positively
associated
with
higher
anxiety,
while
identification
lower
anxiety
avoidance.
These
hypotheses
were
tested
three
cross-sectional
surveys
(Study
1
Social
and
behavioral
science
research
proliferated
during
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
reflecting
substantial
increase
in
influence
of
public
health
policy
more
broadly.
This
review
presents
a
comprehensive
assessment
742
scientific
articles
on
human
behavior
COVID-19.
Two
independent
teams
evaluated
19
substantive
recommendations
(“claims”)
potentially
critical
aspects
behaviors
pandemic
drawn
from
most
widely
cited
papers
Teams
were
made
up
original
authors
an
team,
all
whom
blinded
to
other
team
member
reviews
throughout.
Both
found
evidence
support
16
claims;
for
two
claims,
only
null
evidence;
no
claims
did
find
effects
opposite
direction.
One
claim
had
available
assess.
Seemingly
due
risks
studies
limited
surveys,
highlighting
need
investment
field
validation
studies.
The
strongest
findings
indicate
interventions
that
combat
misinformation
polarization,
utilize
effective
forms
messaging
engage
trusted
leaders
emphasize
positive
social
norms.
Brain and Behavior,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
15(1)
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025
ABSTRACT
Background
In
today's
post‐truth
times,
where
personal
feelings
and
beliefs
have
become
increasingly
important,
determining
what
is
accurate
knowledge
has
an
important
skill.
This
especially
during
uncertainty
crises
(e.g.,
epidemics
pandemics)
because
alternative
explanations
other
than
scientific
may
be
disseminated
vigorously.
Epistemic
justification
concerns
how
in
way
the
truth
of
claims
justified
criteria
for
to
true
and/or
a
fact.
Given
this
backdrop,
present
study
examined
individuals
reacted
conspiracies
crisis
(using
COVID‐19
pandemic
as
example).
Aim
The
mediating
role
epistemic
was
investigated
regarding
its
relationship
between
conspiracy
vaccine
beliefs.
Methods
A
cross‐sectional
conducted
incorporating
multifactorial
correlational
design.
Using
convenience
sampling,
690
participants
(55.7%
females,
M
age
=
32.24
years,
SD
9.75)
from
different
regions
Türkiye
completed
online
survey
via
Google
Forms
.
Results
results
demonstrated
strong
statistically
significant
correlation
theories
vaccination
theories.
effects
by
authority
were
Conclusion
example,
indicated
complex
relationships
justification.
indicate
importance
authorities
taking
early
action
provide
evidence
information
public
avoid
believing
false
information.
