Social Science & Medicine, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 306, С. 115112 - 115112
Опубликована: Июнь 6, 2022
Язык: Английский
Journal of Public Health, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 31(11), С. 1829 - 1845
Опубликована: Сен. 19, 2022
Abstract Aim Although multiple COVID-19 vaccines are approved for global use, vaccine hesitancy poses a substantial risk health. Therefore, the aim of this umbrella review is to identify those factors that influence vaccination in general population. This necessary improve effectiveness future programmes. Methods PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycInfo, Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews, Epistemonikos, and PROSPERO (International Prospective Register Reviews) were searched on December 21, 2021. included reviews which investigated intention, willingness, or with regard adult populations, no restrictions setting. Content-based structure was used synthesise extracted data. The findings presented based Strategic Advisory Group Experts (SAGE) Working Model hesitancy. Results A total 3,392 studies identified, 31 met inclusion criteria. most frequently documented associated contextual factors, such as sex, age, social inequalities; individual group trust healthcare system, public health authorities, governments, history vaccination; vaccine-specific concern safety, perceived barriers, vaccines, about rapid development vaccine; disease-specific fear being infected COVID-19, severity knowledge COVID-19. Conclusion There Our lay foundation further understand uptake provide possible targets intervention However, there gaps research concerning certain including people mental disorders.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
73
Nature, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 613(7945), С. 704 - 711
Опубликована: Дек. 8, 2022
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
73
Scientific Reports, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 13(1)
Опубликована: Июнь 7, 2023
Abstract This article uses novel data collected on a weekly basis covering more than 35,000 individuals in the EU to analyze relationship between trust various dimensions and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. We found that science is negatively correlated, while social media use of as main source information are positively associated with High among adults aged 65+, financially distressed unemployed individuals, hesitancy largely explained by conspiracy beliefs them. Finally, we temporary suspension AstraZeneca March 2021 significantly increased especially people low science, living rural areas, females, distressed. Our findings suggest key determinant pro-vaccine campaigns could be successfully targeted toward groups at high risk
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
45
Science, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 384(6699)
Опубликована: Май 30, 2024
Low uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine in US has been widely attributed to social media misinformation. To evaluate this claim, we introduce a framework combining lab experiments (total N = 18,725), crowdsourcing, and machine learning estimate causal effect 13,206 vaccine-related URLs on vaccination intentions Facebook users ( ≈ 233 million). We that impact unflagged content nonetheless encouraged skepticism was 46-fold greater than misinformation flagged by fact-checkers. Although reduced predicted significantly more when viewed, users’ exposure limited. In contrast, stories highlighting rare deaths after were among Facebook’s most-viewed stories. Our work emphasizes need scrutinize factually accurate but potentially misleading addition outright falsehoods.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
30
Journal of Medical Virology, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 95(1)
Опубликована: Сен. 17, 2022
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the prevalence factors associated with vaccine hesitancy unwillingness in Canada. Eleven databases were searched March 2022. The pooled of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was estimated. Subgroup analyses meta-regressions performed. Out 667 studies screened, 86 full-text articles reviewed, 30 included review. Twenty-four meta-analysis; 12 for (42.3% [95% CI, 33.7%-51.0%]) (20.1% 15.2%-24.9%]). Vaccine higher females (18.3% 12.4%-24.2%]) than males (13.9% 9.0%-18.8%]), rural (16.3% 12.9%-19.7%]) versus urban areas (14.1% [95%CI, 9.9%-18.3%]). (19.9% 11.0%-24.8%]) compared (13.6% 8.0%-19.2%]), non-White individuals (21.7% 16.2%-27.3%]) White (14.8% 11.0%-18.5%]), secondary or less (24.2% 18.8%-29.6%]) postsecondary education (15.9% 11.6%-20.2%]). Factors related to racial disparities, gender, level, age are discussed.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
65
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 7(10), С. 298 - 298
Опубликована: Окт. 13, 2022
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommended coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) booster dose vaccination after completing the primary series for individuals ≥18 years and most-at-risk populations. This study aimed to estimate pooled proportion of COVID-19 vaccine uptake intention get among general populations healthcare workers (HCWs). We searched PsycINFO, Scopus, EBSCO, MEDLINE Central/PubMed, ProQuest, SciELO, SAGE, Web Science, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect according PRISMA guidelines. From a total 1079 screened records, 50 studies were extracted. Meta-analysis was conducted using 48 high-quality Newcastle-Ottawa Scale quality assessment tool. Using included studies, acceptance 198,831 subjects 81% (95% confidence interval (CI): 75–85%, I2 = 100%). actual in eight involving 12,995 31% CI: 19–46%, 100%), while have 79% 72–85%, vaccines HCWs 66% 58–74%), 99%). Meta-regression revealed that previous infection associated with lower dose. Conversely, significantly higher level uptake. WHO region Americas, which did not include any vaccination, 77% 66–85%, Western Pacific 89% 84–92%, 100), followed by European region: 86% 81–90%, 99%), Eastern Mediterranean 59% 46–71%, Southeast Asian 52% 43–61%, 95). Having chronic trust effectiveness significant predictors acceptance. global rate is high, but rates vary region. To achieve herd immunity disease, high required. Intensive campaigns programs are still needed around world raise public awareness regarding importance accepting proper control pandemic.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
64
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 18(18), С. 9488 - 9488
Опубликована: Сен. 8, 2021
Vaccine hesitancy refers to delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccines despite the availability vaccine services. Despite efforts United States healthcare providers vaccinate bulk its population, is still a severe challenge that has led resurgence COVID-19 cases over 100,000 people during early August 2021. To our knowledge, there are limited nationwide studies examined spatial distribution vaccination rates, mainly based on social vulnerability index (SVI). In this study, we compiled database percentage fully vaccinated at county scale across continental as 29 July 2021, along with SVI data potential significant covariates. We further employed multiscale geographically weighted regression model nonstationarity rates. Our findings indicated could explain 79% variance rate Per capita income and Minority (%) (with positive impacts), Age 17 younger (%), Mobile homes Uninsured negative effects). However, impact each covariate varied for different counties due using separate optimal bandwidths. This timely study can serve geospatial reference support public health decision-makers forming region-specific policies monitoring programs from geographic perspective.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
61
The Lancet Global Health, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 11(2), С. e207 - e217
Опубликована: Дек. 21, 2022
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
55
Vaccines, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 10(2), С. 230 - 230
Опубликована: Фев. 2, 2022
COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy has become a major concern around the world. Recent reports have also highlighted in healthcare workers. Despite media and scientific publications, little is known about extent predictors of refusal among nurses. Thus, purpose this study was to assess vaccine rates nurses globally explore reasons for factors associated with uptake vaccines. A scoping review published literature conducted, final pool 51 studies (n = 41,098 nurses) from 36 countries included review. The overall pooled prevalence rate worldwide 20.7% (95% CI 16.5-27%). were higher March 2020-December 2020 compared January 2021-May 2021. concerns safety, side effects, efficacy; misinformation lack knowledge; mistrust experts, authorities, or pharmaceutical companies. acceptance vaccines were: male sex, older age, flu history. Evidence-based strategies should be implemented systems increase ensure their safety patients community members.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
50
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 10(3), С. 1025 - 1034
Опубликована: Апрель 7, 2022
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
50