Статья посвящена изучению нового объекта гражданских прав — токену (цифровому праву). Исследуется вопрос о юридической природе, гражданско-правовом режиме цифровых прав. Анализируются нормы закона о понятии и содержании цифровых прав. Рассмотрение токена как цифрового способа фиксации имущественных прав дает возможность рассматривать его как некую имущественную ценность, правовой режим которой аналогичен «ценным правам» (Wertrechte), выделяемым в европейском континентальном праве германского типа. Сделан вывод, что токен выполняет в информационной системе несколько функций: 1) распознавание управомоченного лица; 2) цифровая единица цены доли участия лица в бизнес-проекте, в инвестировании строительства; 3) цифровая единица баланса актива имущества юридического лица; 4) цифровой аналог бездокументарных ценных бумаг; 5) …
Juridical Science and Practice,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
19(4), С. 42 - 52
Опубликована: Фев. 21, 2024
Various
stages
of
capital
amnesty
carried
out
in
the
Russian
Federation
have
been
identified
and
considered
from
1993
to
2022.
They
are
related
adoption
new
(modified)
rules
contained
special
legislative
other
normative
acts.
The
most
significant
profitable
preferences
for
declarants,
conditions
implementation
defined
its
every
period.
In
context
formation
development
digital
economy,
gaps
current
legislation
identified,
proposals
improvement
made.
particular,
it
is
concluded
that
if
mechanism
voluntary
repatriation
abroad
renewed,
should
extend
all
persons
regardless
their
legal
status.
It
also
necessary
include
rights,
currencies
brokerage
accounts
list
objects
subject
declaration
purpose
amnesty.
advisable
carry
redomicilation
entities
wishing
return
domestic
any
countries.
Theoretical and Applied Law,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
1, С. 37 - 43
Опубликована: Апрель 17, 2024
The
development
of
digital
technologies
permeates
almost
all
areas
public
relations.
At
the
same
time,
certain
remain
more
conservative,
and
legal
regulation
also
lags
behind
pace
general
digitalization.
This
situation
is
especially
clearly
visible
in
field
inheritance
assets.
subject
this
article
to
explore
opportunities
risks
associated
with
inheriting
NFTs.
purpose
determine
algorithms
for
NFTs
context
insufficient
procedure
Russian
Federation.
work
uses
methods
both
empirical
(analysis
synthesis,
induction
deduction,
systematization)
theoretical
(methods
constructing
studying
object
study
justifying
knowledge)
levels.
When
transferring
a
token,
unique
record
transferred,
previous
owner
NFT
loses
token
after
it
transferred.
makes
similar
material
objects
necessitates
separate
rights
An
inherited,
not
such
as
art.
main
problem
that
these
are
intangible.
They
cannot
be
physically
materialized,
stored,
example,
safe
deposit
box,
or
transferred
physically.
Therefore,
if
owners
do
have
specific
heirs,
will
even
difficult
include
find
out
about
token.
Inheriting
an
requires
name
explanation
where
held.
testator’s
password
must
available.
There
may
problems
compulsory
share
inheritance,
related
access
assessment
dynamically
changing
value
NFT.
Also,
valuation
influence
amount
state
fee
issuing
certificate
inheritance.
practical
implementation
facilitated
by
appropriate
optimize
procedural
aspects.
Theoretical and Applied Law,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
1, С. 17 - 22
Опубликована: Апрель 17, 2024
Digital
rights
are
an
object
of
civil
circulation
that
has
a
number
specific
features.
Such
features,
in
particular,
include:
the
ability
to
use
only
through
software
and
hardware,
within
framework
information
system
not
material
world,
self-verification
belonging
subject.
Therefore,
disputes
about
digital
have
at
least
three
features:
these
economic
assets;
relevant
evidence
is
contained
very
subject
dispute;
right
does
property,
is,
with
possibility
applying
law
following
subject,
location
property.The
purpose
study
understand
peculiarities
as
objects
regulation
identify
possibilities
for
consideration
disputes,
which
rights.Research
methods:
teleological,
comparative
content
analysis
enforcement.
Using
teleological
method,
intended
regulating
was
identified.
The
article
made
it
possible
put
forward
motivate
opinion
on
need
create
specialized
court
resolve
rights.
A
limited
enforcement
practice
current
features
substantive
resolution
related
rights.The
conclusions
based
postulate
legal
force
judicial
act
resolving
dispute
merits
relation
certain
will
make
determine
further
fate
asset,
but
also
authorize
law,
stop
(prohibit)
or
prescribe
significant
conditions
Actual Problems of Russian Law,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
19(12), С. 48 - 56
Опубликована: Ноя. 6, 2024
In
civil
circulation,
due
to
its
digitalization,
virtual
objects
that,
unlike
a
real
object
of
the
surrounding
world
in
usual
sense,
have
digital
form
wihout
shell,
are
widespread.
The
law
regime
is
not
defined
current
legislation.
Meanwhile,
context
development
metaverse
concepts,
this
problem
and
search
for
ways
solve
it
becoming
increasingly
urgent.
Determining
legal
created
by
user
platform
on
which
access
reality
provided,
augmented
objects,
as
well
existing
within
metaverse,
where
user’s
activities
can
be
carried
out,
ambiguous
scholarship
jurisprudence.
This
study
was
undertaken
determine
features
reality,
metaverse.
It
concluded
that
regimes
familiar
(property,
results
intellectual
activity,
intangible
benefits,
services)
extended
under
consideration.
However,
material
concept
does
fully
reflect
nature
study.
Therefore,
copy
things
physical
world,
essence,
recognized
other
property
rights.
At
same
time,
rules
applied
these
only
if
they
result
person’s
creative
efforts.
Actual Problems of Russian Law,
Год журнала:
2020,
Номер
15(2), С. 86 - 93
Опубликована: Март 21, 2020
At
the
moment,
social
and
economic
conditions
of
development
focus
on
shared
consumption,
which
raises
new
issues
legal
regime
property
rights,
namely,
rights
(claims),
options,
digital
uncertificated
paperless
securities.
Uncertificated
securities
have
become
an
important
stage
in
information
revolution,
but
their
is
ambiguous
undefined.
An
optional
design
was
provided
back
2008
under
Concept
Development
Civil
Legislation
Russian
Federation.
Subsequently,
it
included
draft
federal
law
amendments
to
Code
Based
some
provisions
law,
Federal
Law
March
8,
2015,
Amendments
Part
One
Federation
Art.
429.2
set
forth
option
make
a
contract
and,
429.3
Federation,
agreement
forth.
In
doctrine,
spread
ownership
as
"incorporeal
things"
caused
critical
response.
The
these
objects
context
specific
regulation
judicial
interpretation
ambiguous.
paper
analyses
concept,
nature,
qualifying
features
makes
proposal
introduce
unified
relation
objects.
International Accounting,
Год журнала:
2020,
Номер
23(5), С. 567 - 584
Опубликована: Май 15, 2020
Subject.
Money
transfers
via
Blockchain-based
banking
and
payment
systems
employ
a
procedure
combining
the
traditional
mechanism
of
gross
settlements
P2P
network,
which
is
also
run
with
Blockchain.
Therefore,
relationship
between
peers
mixed
too.
Objectives.
The
study
aims
to
set
up
legal
credit
synergistically
combines
two
procedures,
i.e.
national
system
payments
based
on
Methods.
relies
upon
systemic-structural,
dialectical,
logic
methods,
induction,
deduction,
forecast,
modeling
comparative
method
(legal
comparison).
Results.
I
examine
how
advantages
can
be
combined.
This
will
streamline
smooth
settlements,
allowing
use
fiat
currency
in
beginning
at
end
transfers.
article
highlights
four
phases
money
transfer,
preliminary
creation
node,
accession
protocol,
opening
cryptocurrency
accounts
e-wallets;
commencement
transfer
under
rules
laws;
interbanking
Blockchain
crediting
ordinary
laws.
Conclusions
Relevance.
When
migrate
from
conventional
bank
Blockchain,
converts
into
vice
versa.
analyzed
types
social
relations
emerging
through
above
sources
regulations.
findings
used
theory
civil
laws,
law
making
processes
for
preparation
regulatory
documents
cashless
payments,
IT
Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the RAS,
Год журнала:
2020,
Номер
15(2), С. 175 - 198
Опубликована: Июнь 30, 2020
ЦИФРОВЫЕ
ПРАВА
В
ГРАЖДАНСКОМ
КОДЕКСЕ:
БЛИЖАЙШИЕ
ПОСЛЕДСТВИЯ
И
ОТДАЛЕННЫЕ
ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫАннотация.В
статье
анализируются
теоретические
и
практические
последствия
вступления
в
силу
новой
редакции
ст.128
ст.141.1
Гражданского
кодекса
РФ,
дополнивших
перечень
объектов
гражданских
прав
цифровыми
правами.Обобщаются
сопоставляются
точки
зрения
отечественных
правоведов
на
правовую
природу
криптовалют
токенов,
выделяются
критерии
их
отграничения
от
известных
прав,
таких
как
вещи,
электронные
денежные
средства,
бездокументарные
ценные
бумаги
иные
виды
объектов.Отдельно
анализируется
информационная
природа
цифровых
допустимость
отнесения
к
одному
из
видов
информации.Рассматриваются
возможные
концептуальные
подходы
решению
проблем
правового
регулирования
выпуска
оборота
том
числе
с
учетом
опыта
зарубежных
правопорядков,
российской
иностранной
судебной
практики.Сравнивается
понятийный
аппарат
гражданского
информационного
законодательства
части
дефиниций
терминов,
имеющих
информационную
(цифровую)
природу.В
также
основные
положения
Федерального
закона
№
259-ФЗ
«О
привлечении
инвестиций
использованием
инвестиционных
платформ
о
внесении
изменений
отдельные
законодательные
акты
Российской
Федерации»,
вступившего
1
января
2020
г.,
проекта
федерального
финансовых
активах»,
который
находится
рассмотрении
Государственной
Думы
Собрания
РФ.В
информационной
природы
данная
категория
рассматривается
позиций
гармонизации
законодательства,
контексте
оценки
исключения
информации
перечня
прав.В
связи
этим
формируются
различные
сценарии
А.Г.Дейнеко
Труды
Института
государства
права
РАН.2020.Том
15.
2
такой
гармонизации,
достоинства
недостатки,
обосновывается
тезис
необходимости
системного
подхода
правовому
регулированию
прав.Анализируется
концепт
цифрового
особой
сферы
правоотношений,
параллельной
обычному
гражданскому
обороту.Рассматриваются
ключевые
свойства
киберпространства
уникальной
непосредственно
влияющей
содержание
указанных
правоотношений.В
проблемы
трансграничности
(трансюрисдикционности)
киберпространства,
а
дается
оценка
влиянию
фактора
анонимности
правоотношения
по
обороту
прав.Правовое
регулирование
заключении
аналогии
правовой
эволюцией
интеллектуальной
собственности,
которые
заре
своего
появления
были
отнесены
числу
до
тех
пор,
пока
не
стала
очевидной
необходимость
объектам
suigeneris.
Oeconomia et Jus,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
2, С. 98 - 105
Опубликована: Июнь 28, 2022
The
article
reveals
the
features
of
legal
regulation
digital
rights,
their
regulatory
and
consolidation
in
civil
legislation,
peculiarities
application
property
turnover,
existence
a
close
connection
this
category
rights
with
information
technologies
resources.
Attention
is
focused
on
norm-definition
concept
"digital
rights".
opinions
scientists
researchers
importance
problem
its
qualification
at
level
are
given.
Certain
types
that
have
found
industry
legislation
considered.
purpose
study
to
analyze
content
types:
problems
within
framework
current
legislation.
According
results
study,
authors
believe
should
be
recognized
as
new
objects
rights.
It
necessary
expand
novel
definition
consolidate
it
law,
taking
into
account
practical
which
will
make
possible
bring
higher
defining
types,
criteria
Lex Russica,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
75(10), С. 9 - 16
Опубликована: Окт. 17, 2022
The
author
considers
the
concept
of
«digital
money».
paper
analyzes
legal
nature
various
types
digital
currency.
Special
attention
is
paid
to
civil
law
regime
cryptocurrency
and
peculiarities
its
property
turnover
in
an
information
system
using
blockchain
technologies.
examines
following
complex
debatable
issues
law:
1.
possibility
applying
provisions
on
obligations
relations;
2.
problems
protecting
rights
money
holders;
3.
enforcing
restitution
environment.
design
a
crypto
loan
centralized
Binance
Loan
exchange.
concludes
that
actual
algorithm
for
lending
cryptocurrencies
similar
mechanism
traditional
transfer
things
determined
by
generic
characteristics
applied
loan.
conclusion
reasoned
such
concepts
as
«transaction»,
«legal
relationship»,
«obligation»
«contract»
can
only
be
interaction
participants
relations
environment
with
high
degree
conditionality.
It
has
been
revealed
attempts
qualify
without
taking
into
account
position
legislator
are
premature.
Currently,
relationship
not
it
cannot
formalized
contracts.
determines
tasks
solution
which,
according
author,
will
serve
settle
In
particular,
concerning
legislative
determination
money,
consolidation
facts,
general
need
immediate
resolution.
proved
order
guarantee
proper
fulfillment
cyber
obligations,
necessary
establish
rules
functioning
systems
at
level,
formalize
requirements
their
operators
determine
responsibility
latter
data
safety
reliability
transactions.