Investing in Digital Rights Using Investment Platforms: Peculiarities of Legal Relations

Intelligent systems reference library, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 193 - 203

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

---

Amnesty of capital in Russia: from the post-soviet period to the era of the digital economy

Juridical Science and Practice, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 19(4), P. 42 - 52

Published: Feb. 21, 2024

Various stages of capital amnesty carried out in the Russian Federation have been identified and considered from 1993 to 2022. They are related adoption new (modified) rules contained special legislative other normative acts. The most significant profitable preferences for declarants, conditions implementation defined its every period. In context formation development digital economy, gaps current legislation identified, proposals improvement made. particular, it is concluded that if mechanism voluntary repatriation abroad renewed, should extend all persons regardless their legal status. It also necessary include rights, currencies brokerage accounts list objects subject declaration purpose amnesty. advisable carry redomicilation entities wishing return domestic any countries.

Language: Английский

---

Legal Regulation of Inheritance of Non-Fungible Tokens

Theoretical and Applied Law, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 1, P. 37 - 43

Published: April 17, 2024

The development of digital technologies permeates almost all areas public relations. At the same time, certain remain more conservative, and legal regulation also lags behind pace general digitalization. This situation is especially clearly visible in field inheritance assets. subject this article to explore opportunities risks associated with inheriting NFTs. purpose determine algorithms for NFTs context insufficient procedure Russian Federation. work uses methods both empirical (analysis synthesis, induction deduction, systematization) theoretical (methods constructing studying object study justifying knowledge) levels. When transferring a token, unique record transferred, previous owner NFT loses token after it transferred. makes similar material objects necessitates separate rights An inherited, not such as art. main problem that these are intangible. They cannot be physically materialized, stored, example, safe deposit box, or transferred physically. Therefore, if owners do have specific heirs, will even difficult include find out about token. Inheriting an requires name explanation where held. testator’s password must available. There may problems compulsory share inheritance, related access assessment dynamically changing value NFT. Also, valuation influence amount state fee issuing certificate inheritance. practical implementation facilitated by appropriate optimize procedural aspects.

Language: Английский

---

Legal Proceedings in Digital Rights in Independent Procedural System

Theoretical and Applied Law, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 1, P. 17 - 22

Published: April 17, 2024

Digital rights are an object of civil circulation that has a number specific features. Such features, in particular, include: the ability to use only through software and hardware, within framework information system not material world, self-verification belonging subject. Therefore, disputes about digital have at least three features: these economic assets; relevant evidence is contained very subject dispute; right does property, is, with possibility applying law following subject, location property.The purpose study understand peculiarities as objects regulation identify possibilities for consideration disputes, which rights.Research methods: teleological, comparative content analysis enforcement. Using teleological method, intended regulating was identified. The article made it possible put forward motivate opinion on need create specialized court resolve rights. A limited enforcement practice current features substantive resolution related rights.The conclusions based postulate legal force judicial act resolving dispute merits relation certain will make determine further fate asset, but also authorize law, stop (prohibit) or prescribe significant conditions

Language: Английский

---

Civil Law Regime of Metaverse, Virtual and Augmented Reality Objects

Actual Problems of Russian Law, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 19(12), P. 48 - 56

Published: Nov. 6, 2024

In civil circulation, due to its digitalization, virtual objects that, unlike a real object of the surrounding world in usual sense, have digital form wihout shell, are widespread. The law regime is not defined current legislation. Meanwhile, context development metaverse concepts, this problem and search for ways solve it becoming increasingly urgent. Determining legal created by user platform on which access reality provided, augmented objects, as well existing within metaverse, where user’s activities can be carried out, ambiguous scholarship jurisprudence. This study was undertaken determine features reality, metaverse. It concluded that regimes familiar (property, results intellectual activity, intangible benefits, services) extended under consideration. However, material concept does fully reflect nature study. Therefore, copy things physical world, essence, recognized other property rights. At same time, rules applied these only if they result person’s creative efforts.

Language: Английский

---

A Right as an Object of Civil Law Relations in the Context of Digital Environment and Economy of Shared Consumption

Actual Problems of Russian Law, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 15(2), P. 86 - 93

Published: March 21, 2020

At the moment, social and economic conditions of development focus on shared consumption, which raises new issues legal regime property rights, namely, rights (claims), options, digital uncertificated paperless securities. Uncertificated securities have become an important stage in information revolution, but their is ambiguous undefined. An optional design was provided back 2008 under Concept Development Civil Legislation Russian Federation. Subsequently, it included draft federal law amendments to Code Based some provisions law, Federal Law March 8, 2015, Amendments Part One Federation Art. 429.2 set forth option make a contract and, 429.3 Federation, agreement forth. In doctrine, spread ownership as "incorporeal things" caused critical response. The these objects context specific regulation judicial interpretation ambiguous. paper analyses concept, nature, qualifying features makes proposal introduce unified relation objects.

Language: Английский

---

The mechanism of credit transfers via the Blockchain

International Accounting, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 23(5), P. 567 - 584

Published: May 15, 2020

Subject. Money transfers via Blockchain-based banking and payment systems employ a procedure combining the traditional mechanism of gross settlements P2P network, which is also run with Blockchain. Therefore, relationship between peers mixed too. Objectives. The study aims to set up legal credit synergistically combines two procedures, i.e. national system payments based on Methods. relies upon systemic-structural, dialectical, logic methods, induction, deduction, forecast, modeling comparative method (legal comparison). Results. I examine how advantages can be combined. This will streamline smooth settlements, allowing use fiat currency in beginning at end transfers. article highlights four phases money transfer, preliminary creation node, accession protocol, opening cryptocurrency accounts e-wallets; commencement transfer under rules laws; interbanking Blockchain crediting ordinary laws. Conclusions Relevance. When migrate from conventional bank Blockchain, converts into vice versa. analyzed types social relations emerging through above sources regulations. findings used theory civil laws, law making processes for preparation regulatory documents cashless payments, IT

Language: Английский

---

Digital Rights in the Russian Civil Code: Immediate Consequences and Long-term Prospects

Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the RAS, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 15(2), P. 175 - 198

Published: June 30, 2020

ЦИФРОВЫЕ ПРАВА В ГРАЖДАНСКОМ КОДЕКСЕ: БЛИЖАЙШИЕ ПОСЛЕДСТВИЯ И ОТДАЛЕННЫЕ ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫАннотация.В статье анализируются теоретические и практические последствия вступления в силу новой редакции ст.128 ст.141.1 Гражданского кодекса РФ, дополнивших перечень объектов гражданских прав цифровыми правами.Обобщаются сопоставляются точки зрения отечественных правоведов на правовую природу криптовалют токенов, выделяются критерии их отграничения от известных прав, таких как вещи, электронные денежные средства, бездокументарные ценные бумаги иные виды объектов.Отдельно анализируется информационная природа цифровых допустимость отнесения к одному из видов информации.Рассматриваются возможные концептуальные подходы решению проблем правового регулирования выпуска оборота том числе с учетом опыта зарубежных правопорядков, российской иностранной судебной практики.Сравнивается понятийный аппарат гражданского информационного законодательства части дефиниций терминов, имеющих информационную (цифровую) природу.В также основные положения Федерального закона № 259-ФЗ «О привлечении инвестиций использованием инвестиционных платформ о внесении изменений отдельные законодательные акты Российской Федерации», вступившего 1 января 2020 г., проекта федерального финансовых активах», который находится рассмотрении Государственной Думы Собрания РФ.В информационной природы данная категория рассматривается позиций гармонизации законодательства, контексте оценки исключения информации перечня прав.В связи этим формируются различные сценарии А.Г.Дейнеко Труды Института государства права РАН.2020.Том 15. 2 такой гармонизации, достоинства недостатки, обосновывается тезис необходимости системного подхода правовому регулированию прав.Анализируется концепт цифрового особой сферы правоотношений, параллельной обычному гражданскому обороту.Рассматриваются ключевые свойства киберпространства уникальной непосредственно влияющей содержание указанных правоотношений.В проблемы трансграничности (трансюрисдикционности) киберпространства, а дается оценка влиянию фактора анонимности правоотношения по обороту прав.Правовое регулирование заключении аналогии правовой эволюцией интеллектуальной собственности, которые заре своего появления были отнесены числу до тех пор, пока не стала очевидной необходимость объектам suigeneris.

Language: Русский

---

NEW DIGITAL RIGHTS AND THEIR TYPES: PROBLEMS OF LEGAL QUALIFICATION IN CIVIL LAW

Oeconomia et Jus, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 2, P. 98 - 105

Published: June 28, 2022

The article reveals the features of legal regulation digital rights, their regulatory and consolidation in civil legislation, peculiarities application property turnover, existence a close connection this category rights with information technologies resources. Attention is focused on norm-definition concept "digital rights". opinions scientists researchers importance problem its qualification at level are given. Certain types that have found industry legislation considered. purpose study to analyze content types: problems within framework current legislation. According results study, authors believe should be recognized as new objects rights. It necessary expand novel definition consolidate it law, taking into account practical which will make possible bring higher defining types, criteria

Language: Английский

---

A Crypto Loan: Problems of Legal Qualification

Lex Russica, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 75(10), P. 9 - 16

Published: Oct. 17, 2022

The author considers the concept of «digital money». paper analyzes legal nature various types digital currency. Special attention is paid to civil law regime cryptocurrency and peculiarities its property turnover in an information system using blockchain technologies. examines following complex debatable issues law: 1. possibility applying provisions on obligations relations; 2. problems protecting rights money holders; 3. enforcing restitution environment. design a crypto loan centralized Binance Loan exchange. concludes that actual algorithm for lending cryptocurrencies similar mechanism traditional transfer things determined by generic characteristics applied loan. conclusion reasoned such concepts as «transaction», «legal relationship», «obligation» «contract» can only be interaction participants relations environment with high degree conditionality. It has been revealed attempts qualify without taking into account position legislator are premature. Currently, relationship not it cannot formalized contracts. determines tasks solution which, according author, will serve settle In particular, concerning legislative determination money, consolidation facts, general need immediate resolution. proved order guarantee proper fulfillment cyber obligations, necessary establish rules functioning systems at level, formalize requirements their operators determine responsibility latter data safety reliability transactions.

Language: Английский

---