Journal of Offender Rehabilitation,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
63(1), С. 1 - 20
Опубликована: Дек. 6, 2023
Sentinel
event
review
systems
were
created
to
prevent
catastrophes
from
occurring
in
complex
human
organizations,
though
they
have
yet
be
fully
realized
corrections.
reviews
may
particularly
salient
for
incarcerated
people
who
engage
dual
harming
behaviors
(i.e.,
self-harm
and
violence)
given
their
overrepresentation
disciplinary
incidents.
To
explore
this
potential,
incident
reports
spanning
a
three-year
period
an
entire
state
prison
system
examined.
Our
specific
objectives
assess
the
prevalence
of
institutional
incidents
committed
by
harm,
identify
unique
characteristics.
Quantitative
estimations
indicated
how
harmers,
comparison
other
population
members,
responsible
higher
proportion
Further
analyses
harm
disproportionately
more
at-risk
mental
health
issues,
likely
housed
maximum-security
facilities.
Policy
implications
are
discussed.
Background
Co-occurring
self-harm
and
aggression
(dual
harm)
is
particularly
prevalent
among
forensic
mental
health
service
(FMHS)
patients.
There
limited
understanding
of
why
this
population
engages
in
dual
harm.
Aims
This
work
aims
to
explore
FMHS
patients’
experiences
harm
how
they
make
sense
behaviour,
with
a
focus
on
the
role
emotions.
Method
Participants
were
identified
from
their
participation
previous
study.
Sixteen
patients
lifetime
history
recruited
two
hospitals.
Individuals
participated
one-to-one,
semi-structured
interviews
where
reflected
past
and/or
current
aggression.
Interview
transcripts
analysed
using
reflexive
thematic
analysis.
Results
Six
themes
generated:
as
emotional
regulation
strategies,
consequences
witnessing
harmful
behaviours,
relationships
others
self,
trapped
within
criminal
justice
system,
convergence
divergence
aggression,
moving
forward
an
patient.
Themes
highlighted
shared
risk
factors
across
participants,
including
dysregulation,
perceived
lack
social
support
behaviours.
underlined
duality
primarily
utilising
both
regulate
negative
These
behaviours
also
fulfilled
distinct
purposes
at
times
(e.g.
punishment,
defence).
The
impact
contextual
FMHSs,
restrictive
practices
institutionalisation,
emphasised.
Conclusions
Findings
provide
recommendations
that
can
help
address
settings,
(a)
transdiagnostic,
individualised
approaches
consider
aggression;
(b)
cultural
organisational
recovery-centred
practice.
American Journal of Public Health,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
115(4), С. 596 - 604
Опубликована: Март 12, 2025
Dual-harm,
the
co-occurrence
of
self-
and
other-harm,
recognizes
overlap
between
these
outcomes
aggressive
behavior
their
potential
shared
causes.
Little
progress
has
been
made
in
preventing
responding
to
dual-harm
broader
population,
it
remains
understudied
public
health
research.
We
posit
that
scientific
investigation
would
greatly
benefit
from
application
principles
methods.
In
this
essay,
we
operationalize
as
a
problem
identify
gaps
knowledge,
addressing
its
conceptual
definitional
issues,
prevalence
estimates,
methodological
considerations,
theoretical
foundations,
risk
factors,
prevention
strategies.
also
offer
series
recommendations
advance
study
challenge
notion
conflating
nonfatal
with
homicide-suicide
part
continuum,
arguing
they
are
distinct
phenomena.
need
for
epidemiological
studies
characterize
those
engaging
better
understand
mechanisms
outcomes,
focusing
on
adolescence
critical
developmental
period.
Future
should
develop,
implement,
evaluate
targeted
intervention
preventive
efforts
individuals
involved
or
at
dual-harm.
(
Am
J
Public
Health.
2025;115(4):596–604.
https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307940
)
Abstract
Background
Dual
harm
encompasses
the
complex
interplay
of
co-occurrence
self-harm
and
aggression.
Individuals
with
dual
may
display
a
more
hazardous
pattern
harmful
behaviors
like
homicide-suicide
compared
to
people
sole
harm.
This
study
aimed
examine
presence
among
general
psychiatry
inpatients
in
mental
health
unit
Uganda.
Methods
A
retrospective
chart
review
3098
from
January
2018
December
2021.
reported
experience
at
admission
was
based
on
experiences
or
property
both.
Logistic
regression
assessed
association
between
sociodemographics
clinical
characteristics.
Results
total
29
(1%)
patients
experienced
harm,
five
having
both
others
property,
23
people,
one
property.
statistically
significantly
associated
male
gender
bivariate
analysis.
However,
there
were
no
significant
factors
multivariate
analysis
sensitivity
specific
types
Conclusion
General
Uganda
before
lower
prevalence
than
previous
literature.
investigated
sociodemographic
could
explain
these
experiences.
Further
studies
looking
are
warranted
understand
unfortunate
serious
consequences
Psychological Medicine,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
53(15), С. 7116 - 7126
Опубликована: Март 31, 2023
The
aetiology
of
dual
harm
(co-occurring
self-harm
and
violence
towards
others)
is
poorly
understood
because
most
studies
have
investigated
separately.
We
aimed
to
examine
childhood
risk
factors
for
self-harm,
violence,
harm,
including
the
transition
from
engaging
in
single
harm.Data
Avon
Longitudinal
Study
Parents
Children,
a
UK-based
birth
cohort
study,
were
used
estimate
prevalence
self-reported
engagement
at
ages
16
22
years.
Risk
ratios
calculated
indicate
associations
across
various
risks
age
years
22.At
years,
18.1%
4176
members
had
harmed
themselves,
21.1%
engaged
others
3.7%
reported
harm.
At
equivalent
estimates
increased
24.2,
25.8
6.8%,
respectively.
Depression
other
mental
health
difficulties,
drug
alcohol
use,
witnessing
being
victim
of,
or
witnessing,
associated
with
higher
transitioning
by
22.Prevalence
doubled
highlighting
importance
early
identification
intervention
during
this
high-risk
period.
Several
psychosocial
specifically
been
identified.
Frontiers in Psychiatry,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
13
Опубликована: Июль 22, 2022
Dual
harm
is
the
co-occurrence
of
self-harm
and
aggression
during
an
individual's
lifetime.
This
behaviour
especially
prevalent
within
criminal
justice
forensic
settings.
The
forms
that
should
be
included
in
definition
dual
have
not
yet
been
established.
study
aimed
to
use
network
analysis
inform
evidence-based
by
assessing
relationship
between
different
aggressive
young
people
(N
=
3,579).
We
used
data
from
Avon
Longitudinal
Study
Parents
Children
(ALSPAC).
Results
revealed
low
correlations
variables,
leading
sparse
models
with
weak
connections.
found
when
separated
into
their
distinct
forms,
acts
are
only
weakly
correlated.
Our
work
provides
preliminary
evidence
assist
understanding
managing
clinical
settings
informs
recommendations
for
future
research.
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
94, С. 101989 - 101989
Опубликована: Апрель 24, 2024
Verbal
and
physical
violence
in
psychiatric
hospitals
can
have
harmful
consequences
for
staff
members,
such
as
injury,
traumatisation,
sick
leave,
they
often
accompany
involuntary
admission.
Harm
to
others
may
co-occur
with
self-harm,
i.e.,
dual
harm.
However,
little
is
known
about
the
association
between
dual-harm
violent
behaviour
towards
members
its
clinical
outcomes,
seclusion
rapid
tranquilisation
after
admission
a
inpatient
unit.
Psychologica Belgica,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
64(1)
Опубликована: Дек. 30, 2024
Self-
and
other-oriented
harmful
behaviors
are
common
among
emerging
adults.
Individuals
who
engage
in
both
forms
of
behavior,
termed
dual-harm,
experience
more
adverse
outcomes
comparison
to
individuals
either.
This
study
examines
temperamental
traits,
defined
as
reactive
regulative
temperament,
transdiagnostic
factors
underlying
engagement
self-oriented,
other-oriented,
dual-harmful
behaviors.
These
operationalized
non-suicidal
self-injury
(NSSI),
direct
aggression,
a
combination
both,
respectively.
Participants
669
adults
(69.36%
women;
Mage
=
21.48;
SD
2.20).
The
focusses
on
how
temperament
can
differentiate
four
different
groups
(i.e.,
no-harm,
NSSI-only,
aggression-only,
dual-harm
group)
pairwise
manner.
Results
highlight
hyper-reactive
Behavioral
inhibitions
system
(BIS)
hypo-reactive
activation
(BAS)-Impulsivity
compared
no-harm
aggression-only.
Conversely,
we
found
BIS
BAS-Impulsivity
those
report
aggressive
behaviors,
NSSI-only.
Finally,
Effortful
control
(EC)
is
the
group,
when
engaging
only
NSSI,
or
neither
highlights
role
traits
differentiating
patterns
which
should
be
integrated
future
research
clinical
interventions.