Prevention Science, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Апрель 14, 2025
Язык: Английский
Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Год журнала: 2020, Номер 218, С. 108364 - 108364
Опубликована: Окт. 18, 2020
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
51
Journal of General Internal Medicine, Год журнала: 2019, Номер 35(1), С. 153 - 159
Опубликована: Окт. 21, 2019
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
50
American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Год журнала: 2020, Номер 58(2), С. e63 - e69
Опубликована: Янв. 17, 2020
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
50
BMJ Open, Год журнала: 2020, Номер 10(9), С. e035148 - e035148
Опубликована: Сен. 1, 2020
Objectives To review the metrics and findings of studies evaluating effects drug decriminalisation or legal regulation on availability, use related health social harms globally. Design Systematic with narrative synthesis. Data sources We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web Science six additional databases for publications from 1 January 1970 through 4 October 2018. Inclusion criteria Peer-reviewed articles published abstracts in any language quantitative data collected before after implementation de jure regulation. extraction synthesis Two independent reviewers screened titles, inclusion. Extraction quality appraisal (modified Downs Black checklist) were performed by one reviewer checked a second, discrepancies resolved third. coded study-level outcome measures into metric groupings categorised estimated direction association between change outcomes interest. Results 4860 titles 221 full-texts included 114 articles. Most (n=104, 91.2%) USA, evaluated cannabis reform (n=109, 95.6%) focussed (n=96, 84.2%). 224 study 32 metrics, most commonly prevalence (39.5% studies), frequency (14.0%) perceived harmfulness (10.5%) decriminalised regulated drug; tobacco, alcohol other drugs (12.3%). Across all substance was often not associated changes use. Conclusions Studies are concentrated USA legalisation. Despite range potentially impacted law reform, extant research is narrowly focussed, particular emphasis Metrics evaluations require improved alignment relevant outcomes.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
48
American Journal of Public Health, Год журнала: 2020, Номер 110(3), С. 363 - 369
Опубликована: Янв. 16, 2020
Objectives. To determine the impact of city-level cannabis decriminalization and medical marijuana laws (MMLs) on fatal traffic crashes in US cities.Methods. Using a census from 2010 to 2017 Fatality Analysis Reporting System, we examined MMLs by age sex driver. We used Poisson difference-in-differences approach, exploiting temporal geographic variation laws.Results. Cities experienced 13% increase involving 15- 24-year-old male drivers following (incidence rate ratio = 1.125; 95% confidence interval 1.014, 1.249). This effect was immediate strongest weekend nights. found no female or older males. Conversely, that were associated with fewer for both males females, which most pronounced drivers.Conclusions. Unlike MMLs, are crashes, cities relative young decriminalization.Public Health Implications. stipulate consumption occurs at home, whereas only lessens penalty possession. Therefore, travel incentives such have heterogeneous effects safety.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
40
Addictive Behaviors, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 123, С. 107049 - 107049
Опубликована: Июль 15, 2021
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
40
Current Addiction Reports, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 10(1), С. 38 - 51
Опубликована: Янв. 10, 2023
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
15
Drug and Alcohol Review, Год журнала: 2020, Номер 39(5), С. 555 - 567
Опубликована: Май 20, 2020
Abstract Issues Non‐medical cannabis policies are changing, including towards legalisation‐with‐regulation frameworks. New Zealand will hold a public referendum on legalisation in 2020. We reviewed data use and health/social harms; policy reform options; experiences with outcomes of reforms elsewhere; other relevant considerations informing choices the upcoming referendum. Approach Relevant epidemiological, health, social, criminal justice studies were identified comprehensively reviewed. Key Findings Cannabis is common (including Zealand) associated risks for health social harms, mainly concentrated young users; key harms attributable to criminalisation. ‘Decriminalisation’ have produced ambivalent results. Existing frameworks vary considerably main parameters. Legalisation offers some distinct advantages, example regulated use, products user education, yet depend essential regulation parameters, commercialisation, ecologies. While major changes not observed, inconclusive date, mixed outcomes, select increasing resilient illegal markets. It unclear whether reduces exposure or (e.g. from enforcement) youth. Implications/Conclusions No conclusive overall evidence elsewhere exists, nor easily transferable settings. direct benefits adults, impacts uncertain. may categorically improve remains well‐intended, while experimental option more measured sensible control greater coherence, requiring close monitoring possible adjustments depending setting‐specific outcomes.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
37
Journal of Adolescent Health, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 74(3), С. 402 - 440
Опубликована: Ноя. 16, 2023
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
13
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Год журнала: 2019, Номер 64(5), С. 351 - 355
Опубликована: Янв. 2, 2019
The study sought to describe a Canadian sample of university students' medicinal use cannabis, including prevalence cannabis disorder (CUD) and replacement traditional treatments with cannabis.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
35