Age-Varying Patterns of Cannabis Use, Related Risk Factors, and their Associations among Young Adults in the Context of Legalized Nonmedical Cannabis DOI
Griselda Martinez, Brian H. Calhoun, Charles B. Fleming

et al.

Prevention Science, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: April 14, 2025

Language: Английский

Impact of state-level cannabis legalization on poly use of alcohol and cannabis in the United States, 2004–2017 DOI
June H. Kim, Andrea H. Weinberger, Jiaqi Zhu

et al.

Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 218, P. 108364 - 108364

Published: Oct. 18, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

51
Sources of Information and Beliefs About the Health Effects of Marijuana DOI Open Access

Julie H. Ishida,

Alysandra J. Zhang,

Stacey Steigerwald

et al.

Journal of General Internal Medicine, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 35(1), P. 153 - 159

Published: Oct. 21, 2019

Language: Английский

Citations

50
Recreational Marijuana Availability in Oregon and Use Among Adolescents DOI
Mallie J. Paschall, Joel W. Grube

American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 58(2), P. e63 - e69

Published: Jan. 17, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

50
Impact evaluations of drug decriminalisation and legal regulation on drug use, health and social harms: a systematic review DOI Creative Commons
Ayden I. Scheim, Nazlee Maghsoudi, Zack Marshall

et al.

BMJ Open, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 10(9), P. e035148 - e035148

Published: Sept. 1, 2020

Objectives To review the metrics and findings of studies evaluating effects drug decriminalisation or legal regulation on availability, use related health social harms globally. Design Systematic with narrative synthesis. Data sources We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web Science six additional databases for publications from 1 January 1970 through 4 October 2018. Inclusion criteria Peer-reviewed articles published abstracts in any language quantitative data collected before after implementation de jure regulation. extraction synthesis Two independent reviewers screened titles, inclusion. Extraction quality appraisal (modified Downs Black checklist) were performed by one reviewer checked a second, discrepancies resolved third. coded study-level outcome measures into metric groupings categorised estimated direction association between change outcomes interest. Results 4860 titles 221 full-texts included 114 articles. Most (n=104, 91.2%) USA, evaluated cannabis reform (n=109, 95.6%) focussed (n=96, 84.2%). 224 study 32 metrics, most commonly prevalence (39.5% studies), frequency (14.0%) perceived harmfulness (10.5%) decriminalised regulated drug; tobacco, alcohol other drugs (12.3%). Across all substance was often not associated changes use. Conclusions Studies are concentrated USA legalisation. Despite range potentially impacted law reform, extant research is narrowly focussed, particular emphasis Metrics evaluations require improved alignment relevant outcomes.

Language: Английский

Citations

48
Marijuana Decriminalization, Medical Marijuana Laws, and Fatal Traffic Crashes in US Cities, 2010–2017 DOI
Amanda Cook,

Gregory Leung,

Rhet A. Smith

et al.

American Journal of Public Health, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 110(3), P. 363 - 369

Published: Jan. 16, 2020

Objectives. To determine the impact of city-level cannabis decriminalization and medical marijuana laws (MMLs) on fatal traffic crashes in US cities.Methods. Using a census from 2010 to 2017 Fatality Analysis Reporting System, we examined MMLs by age sex driver. We used Poisson difference-in-differences approach, exploiting temporal geographic variation laws.Results. Cities experienced 13% increase involving 15- 24-year-old male drivers following (incidence rate ratio = 1.125; 95% confidence interval 1.014, 1.249). This effect was immediate strongest weekend nights. found no female or older males. Conversely, that were associated with fewer for both males females, which most pronounced drivers.Conclusions. Unlike MMLs, are crashes, cities relative young decriminalization.Public Health Implications. stipulate consumption occurs at home, whereas only lessens penalty possession. Therefore, travel incentives such have heterogeneous effects safety.

Language: Английский

Citations

40
Young adult cannabis use disorder treatment admissions declined as past month cannabis use increased in the U.S.: An analysis of states by year, 2008–2017 DOI
Jeremy Mennis, Gerald J. Stahler, Thomas P. McKeon

et al.

Addictive Behaviors, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 123, P. 107049 - 107049

Published: July 15, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

40
Cannabis Legalization and the Decline of Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD) Treatment Utilization in the US DOI
Jeremy Mennis, Gerald J. Stahler, Michael J. Mason

et al.

Current Addiction Reports, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 10(1), P. 38 - 51

Published: Jan. 10, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

15
Facing the option for the legalisation of cannabis use and supply in New Zealand: An overview of relevant evidence, concepts and considerations DOI Creative Commons
Benedikt Fischer, Dimitri Daldegan‐Bueno, Joseph M. Boden

et al.

Drug and Alcohol Review, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 39(5), P. 555 - 567

Published: May 20, 2020

Abstract Issues Non‐medical cannabis policies are changing, including towards legalisation‐with‐regulation frameworks. New Zealand will hold a public referendum on legalisation in 2020. We reviewed data use and health/social harms; policy reform options; experiences with outcomes of reforms elsewhere; other relevant considerations informing choices the upcoming referendum. Approach Relevant epidemiological, health, social, criminal justice studies were identified comprehensively reviewed. Key Findings Cannabis is common (including Zealand) associated risks for health social harms, mainly concentrated young users; key harms attributable to criminalisation. ‘Decriminalisation’ have produced ambivalent results. Existing frameworks vary considerably main parameters. Legalisation offers some distinct advantages, example regulated use, products user education, yet depend essential regulation parameters, commercialisation, ecologies. While major changes not observed, inconclusive date, mixed outcomes, select increasing resilient illegal markets. It unclear whether reduces exposure or (e.g. from enforcement) youth. Implications/Conclusions No conclusive overall evidence elsewhere exists, nor easily transferable settings. direct benefits adults, impacts uncertain. may categorically improve remains well‐intended, while experimental option more measured sensible control greater coherence, requiring close monitoring possible adjustments depending setting‐specific outcomes.

Language: Английский

Citations

37
Adolescents' Cannabis Knowledge and Risk Perception: A Systematic Review DOI Open Access
Megan Harrison, Nuray Kanbur,

Kyle Canton

et al.

Journal of Adolescent Health, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 74(3), P. 402 - 440

Published: Nov. 16, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

13
Cannabis Use for Medicinal Purposes among Canadian University Students DOI Open Access
Jacqueline Smith, Joel Mader, Andrew C. H. Szeto

et al.

The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 64(5), P. 351 - 355

Published: Jan. 2, 2019

The study sought to describe a Canadian sample of university students' medicinal use cannabis, including prevalence cannabis disorder (CUD) and replacement traditional treatments with cannabis.

Language: Английский

Citations

35