Ecological Economics, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 230, С. 108510 - 108510
Опубликована: Дек. 27, 2024
Язык: Английский
Review of Regional Research, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Март 5, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
1
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 11(1)
Опубликована: Май 2, 2024
Abstract This article draws on different strands of existing scholarship to provide an analytical framework for understanding the barriers achieving a well-being economy. It explores interplay between agential and structural power, where some actor-coalitions can reproduce or transform pre-existing structures. Conversely, these structures are strategically selective, favouring actors, interests, strategies over others. Making sense this introduces notion power complex e s —time-space-specific with common industry-related interests in given conjuncture. To understand historical “becoming” today’s political-economic terrain, provides regulationist-inspired history rise, fall, re-emergence four complexes: financial, fossil, livestock-agribusiness, digital. They pose significant threats pillars wellbeing economy such as ecological sustainability, equ(al)ity, democracy. Subsequently, context is scrutinised more detail why certain actors dominate strategic calculations contemporary complexes. reveals selectivities that favour multi- transnational corporate civil society, labour movements, public bureaucracies. The then examines firm-to-state lobbying strategy employed by within assert their interests. presents illustrative cases Blackstone, BP, Bayer, Alphabet. Finally, it implications challenges realising based post-/degrowth visions. emphasises double challenge faced wellbeing-economy actor-coalition. On one hand, has navigate modes regulation capital accumulation while, other, must confront self-expanding extractive logic capital. In context, three key outlined: need form unconventional alliances, operate various spatial dimensions simultaneously, institutionalise alternatives influence policymaking.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
7
AMS Review, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Март 20, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0
Building and Environment, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 112941 - 112941
Опубликована: Март 1, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0
Journal of Cleaner Production, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 145440 - 145440
Опубликована: Апрель 1, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0
Climate Policy, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 1 - 20
Опубликована: Апрель 24, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0
Ecological Economics, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 223, С. 108255 - 108255
Опубликована: Май 31, 2024
Degrowth has been at the centre of ecological economics since days its inception. Recently, degrowth scholarship and practice have turned to questions strategy. To contribute this debate, paper uses methodology problematisation reveal discuss unquestioned assumptions that underpin discursive degrowth-strategy practices hinder effective strategising. Based on Buch-Hansen's assessment (not yet actualised) prerequisites for a paradigm shift, are analysed against aim building comprehensive coalition social forces achieving broad-based consent. In addition, draws Gramscian theory introduce third unactualised prerequisite: will coerce rule. The analysis contributes further developing deep social-ecological-economic change.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
3
Sustainable Production and Consumption, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 51, С. 79 - 91
Опубликована: Сен. 11, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
1
Energy Research & Social Science, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 118, С. 103789 - 103789
Опубликована: Окт. 16, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
1
Ecological Economics, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 230, С. 108510 - 108510
Опубликована: Дек. 27, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
1