Brazilian Journal of Development,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
9(05), С. 14752 - 14771
Опубликована: Май 3, 2023
Este
estudo
tem
como
objetivo
abordar
as
interações
medicamentosas
causadas
pela
polifarmácia
em
pacientes
idosos.
As
são
modificações
dos
efeitos
de
um
ou
mais
fármacos,
podendo
levar
a
uma
diminuição
da
eficácia
do
tratamento
e
o
aparecimento
indesejáveis.
Alguns
fatores
contribuem
para
que
ocorram
idosos,
fisiológicos
patológicos,
vez
organismo
idoso
apresenta
alterações
farmacocinéticas
nos
níveis
absorção,
distribuição,
metabolização,
principalmente
eliminação
pode
acarretar
acúmulo
metabolitos
tóxicos
paciente
colaterais,
hospitalização
morte.
Também
podem
ocorrer
farmacodinâmicas,
seja
por
efeito
sinérgico,
onde
medicamento
sua
ação
potencializada
interagindo
com
outro
medicamento,
antagônico
diminuindo
fármaco,
inibindo
total.
Dessa
forma,
análise
prescrição
intervenção
farmacológica
é
importantíssima
consiste
numa
avaliação
sistemática
riscos
benefícios
potenciais
cada
visto
vulnerabilidade
idosos
acometidos
polifarmácia.
Multimorbidity
and
the
associated
use
of
multiple
medicines
(polypharmacy),
is
common
in
older
population.
Despite
this,
there
no
consensus
definition
for
polypharmacy.
A
systematic
review
was
conducted
to
identify
summarise
polypharmacy
definitions
existing
literature.
The
reporting
this
conforms
Preferred
Reporting
Items
Systematic
reviews
Meta-Analyses
(PRISMA)
checklist.
MEDLINE
(Ovid),
EMBASE
Cochrane
were
systematically
searched,
as
well
grey
literature,
articles
which
defined
term
(without
any
limits
on
types
definitions)
English,
published
between
1st
January
2000
30th
May
2016.
Definitions
categorised
i.
numerical
only
(using
number
medications
define
polypharmacy),
ii.
with
an
duration
therapy
or
healthcare
setting
(such
during
hospital
stay)
iii.
Descriptive
a
brief
description
polypharmacy).
total
1156
identified
110
met
inclusion
criteria.
Articles
not
but
terms
such
minor
major
As
result,
138
obtained.
There
111
(80.4%
all
definitions),
15
incorporated
(10.9%)
12
descriptive
(8.7%).
most
commonly
reported
five
more
daily
(n
=
51,
46.4%
articles),
ranging
from
two
11
medicines.
Only
6.4%
classified
distinction
appropriate
inappropriate
polypharmacy,
using
make
distinction.
Polypharmacy
variable.
Numerical
did
account
specific
comorbidities
present
it
difficult
assess
safety
appropriateness
clinical
setting.
Clinical Epidemiology,
Год журнала:
2018,
Номер
Volume 10, С. 289 - 298
Опубликована: Март 1, 2018
Objective:
Polypharmacy
is
the
concomitant
use
of
several
drugs
by
a
single
person,
and
it
increases
risk
adverse
drug-related
events
in
older
adults.
Little
known
about
epidemiology
polypharmacy
at
population
level.
We
aimed
to
measure
prevalence
incidence
investigate
associated
factors.
Methods:
A
prospective
cohort
study
was
conducted
using
register
data
with
national
coverage
Sweden.
total
1,742,336
individuals
aged
≥65
years
baseline
(November
1,
2010)
were
included
followed
until
death
or
end
(December
20,
2013).
Results:
On
average,
exposed
4.6
(SD
=4.0)
baseline.
The
(5+
drugs)
44.0%,
excessive
(10+
11.7%.
rate
among
without
19.9
per
100
person-years,
ranging
from
16.8%
65–74
33.2%
those
≥95
(adjusted
hazard
ratio
[HR]
=1.49,
95%
confidence
interval
[CI]
1.42–1.56).
8.0
person-years.
Older
adults
multi-dose
dispensing
significantly
higher
developing
incident
compared
receiving
ordinary
prescriptions
(HR
=1.51,
CI
1.47–1.55).
When
adjusting
for
confounders,
living
nursing
home
found
be
lower
risks
=0.79
HR
=0.86,
p
<0.001,
respectively).
Conclusion:
are
high
Interventions
reducing
should
also
target
potential
users
as
they
ones
who
fuel
future
polypharmacy.
Keywords:
drugs,
adults,
polypharmacy,
prescribing,
medication,
elderly
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
87(11), С. 4150 - 4172
Опубликована: Май 18, 2021
Aims
To
synthesise
associations
of
potentially
inappropriate
prescribing
(PIP)
with
health‐related
and
system‐related
outcomes
in
inpatient
hospital
settings.
Methods
Six
electronic
databases
were
searched:
Medline
Complete,
EMBASE,
CINAHL,
PyscInfo,
IPA
Cochrane
library.
Studies
published
between
1
January
1991
31
2021
investigating
PIP
older
adults
settings,
included.
A
random
effects
model
was
employed
using
the
generic
inverse
variance
method
to
pool
risk
estimates.
Results
Overall,
63
studies
included
.
Pooled
estimates
did
not
show
a
significant
association
all‐cause
mortality
(adjusted
odds
ratio
[AOR]
1.10,
95%
confidence
interval
[CI]
0.90–1.36;
adjusted
hazard
1.02,
83%
CI
0.90–1.16),
readmission
(AOR
1.11,
0.76–1.63;
0.89–1.18).
associated
91%,
60%
26%
increased
adverse
drug
event‐related
admissions
1.91,
1.21–3.01),
functional
decline
1.60,
1.28–2.01),
reactions
events
1.26,
1.11–1.43),
respectively.
falls
(2/2
studies).
The
impact
on
emergency
department
visits,
length
stay,
quality
life
inconclusive.
Economic
cost
reported
3
studies,
comprised
various
estimation
methods.
Conclusions
significantly
range
outcomes.
It
is
important
optimise
adults'
prescriptions
facilitate
improved
care.
BMJ,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
unknown, С. e074892 - e074892
Опубликована: Май 7, 2024
Abstract
Polypharmacy
is
common
in
older
adults
and
associated
with
adverse
drug
events,
cognitive
functional
impairment,
increased
healthcare
costs,
risk
of
frailty,
falls,
hospitalizations,
mortality.
Many
barriers
exist
to
deprescribing,
but
efforts
have
been
made
develop
implement
deprescribing
interventions
that
overcome
them.
This
narrative
review
describes
intervention
components
summarizes
findings
from
published
randomized
controlled
trials
tested
polypharmacy,
as
well
reports
on
ongoing
trials,
guidelines,
resources
can
be
used
facilitate
deprescribing.
Most
were
medication
reviews
primary
care
settings,
many
contained
such
shared
decision
making
and/or
a
focus
patient
priorities,
training
for
professionals,
facing
education
materials,
involvement
family
members,
representing
great
heterogeneity
addressing
polypharmacy
adults.
Just
over
half
study
found
perform
better
than
usual
at
least
one
their
outcomes,
most
assessed
12
months
or
less.
The Journals of Gerontology Series A,
Год журнала:
2017,
Номер
73(1), С. 117 - 122
Опубликована: Май 6, 2017
Sarcopenia
affects
more
than
10%
of
older
adults.
Next
to
age-associated
physiologic
changes,
diseases
like
diabetes
or
inflammatory,
neurological,
malignant
and
endocrine
disorders
may
contribute
the
development
sarcopenia.
Likewise,
polypharmacy,
i.e.,
multiple
drug
use,
is
common
among
Although
two
conditions
frequently
co-occur,
association
polypharmacy
with
sarcopenia
has
not
yet
been
examined.
We
investigated
in
a
large
cohort
community-dwelling
adults
(60–84
years).
Thousand
five
hundred
participants
from
Berlin
Aging
Study
II
were
included.
Polypharmacy
was
defined
as
concurrent
use
5
drugs
(prescription
nonprescription).
Body
composition
assessed
dual-energy
X-ray
absorptiometry,
appendicular
lean
mass
(ALM)
calculated
sum
four
limbs'
mass.
low
ALM-to-body
index
(BMI)-ratio
using
validated
sex-specific
cutoffs.
Mean
age
68.7
±
3.7
years,
50.7%
female.
The
median
(interquartile
range)
number
2
(1–4);
21.1%
subjects
reported
regular
≥5
drugs.
Subjects
often
sarcopenic
according
applied
ALM/BMI-cutoffs
(16.3%
vs
6.9%,
p
<
0.001),
higher
BMI
(p
0.001)
lower
ALM/BMI
but
no
significant
difference
mean
ALM.
Notably,
also
associated
rates
reduced
gait
speed
exhaustion.
Even
after
multivariable
adjustment
(sex,
age,
comorbid
physical
activity)
consistently
significantly
increased
likelihood
(odds
ratio
=
2.24,
95%
confidence
interval
[CI]
1.33–3.75).
clinically
relevant
sarcopenia,
by
ALM/BMI.
PLoS ONE,
Год журнала:
2017,
Номер
12(11), С. e0188348 - e0188348
Опубликована: Ноя. 20, 2017
Background
Inappropriate
use
of
multiple
medicines
(inappropriate
polypharmacy)
is
a
major
challenge
in
older
people
with
consequences
increased
prevalence
and
severity
adverse
drug
reactions
interactions,
reduced
adherence.
The
aim
this
study
was
to
determine
the
levels
consensus
amongst
key
stakeholders
European
Union
(EU)
relation
aspects
management
polypharmacy
people.
Methods
Forty-six
statements
were
developed
on
healthcare
structures,
processes
desired
outcomes,
defined
at
≥
80%
agreement.
Panel
members
strategists
(e.g.
directors,
leading
clinicians
commissioners)
from
each
28
EU
member
states,
target
recruitment
five
per
state.
Three
Delphi
rounds
conducted
via
email,
panel
being
provided
summative
results
collated,
anonymised
comments
commencement
Rounds
2
3.
Results
Ninety
recruited
(64.3%
target),
high
participation
throughout
three
(91.1%,
83.3%,
72.2%).
During
Round
1,
obtained
for
27/46
(58.7%),
an
additional
two
none
Consensus
relating
to:
potential
gain
arising
(3/4
statements);
strategic
development
(7/7);
change
(5/7)
indicator
measures
(4/6);
legislation
(0/3);
awareness
raising
(5/5);
reviews
(5/7);
vision
(0/7).
Analysis
free
text
indicated
that
too
ambitious
not
achievable
by
specified
timeframe
2025.
Conclusion
around
many
Notably,
no
achieved
need
alter
areas
delivery,
remuneration
practitioner
scope
practice.
While
2025
considered
rather
ambitious,
there
great
clear
opportunity
advance
beyond.