Journal of Insurance Medicine,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
51(2), С. 111 - 115
Опубликована: Июль 1, 2024
Context.—
As
the
Covid-19
pandemic
continues
into
its
4th
year,
reports
of
long-term
morbidity
and
mortality
are
now
attracting
attention.
Recent
studies
suggest
that
survivors
at
increased
risk
common
illnesses,
such
as
myocardial
infarction,
diabetes
mellitus
autoimmune
disorders.
Mortality
may
also
be
increased.
This
article
will
review
evidence
supports
some
these
observations
provide
an
opinion
about
their
validity
relevance
to
insured
cohorts.
JAMA Health Forum,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
4(7), С. e231933 - e231933
Опубликована: Июль 7, 2023
Importance
Post–COVID-19
condition
(PCC),
also
known
as
long
COVID,
encompasses
the
range
of
symptoms
and
sequelae
that
affect
many
people
with
prior
SARS-CoV-2
infection.
Understanding
functional,
health,
economic
effects
PCC
is
important
in
determining
how
health
care
systems
may
optimally
deliver
to
individuals
PCC.
Observations
A
rapid
review
literature
showed
hospitalization
for
severe
critical
illness
limit
a
person’s
ability
perform
day-to-day
activities
employment,
increase
their
risk
incident
conditions
use
primary
short-term
services,
have
negative
association
household
financial
stability.
Care
pathways
integrate
care,
rehabilitation
specialized
assessment
clinics
are
being
developed
support
needs
However,
comparative
studies
determine
optimal
models
based
on
effectiveness
costs
remain
limited.
The
likely
large-scale
associations
economies
will
require
substantial
investment
research,
clinical
policy
mitigate
these
effects.
Conclusions
Relevance
An
accurate
understanding
additional
at
individual
system
levels
informing
resource
planning,
including
identification
affected
by
Vaccine,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
42(9), С. 2357 - 2369
Опубликована: Март 6, 2024
During
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
EMA
set-up
a
large-scale
cohort
event
monitoring
(CEM)
system
to
estimate
incidence
rates
of
patient-reported
adverse
drug
reactions
(ADRs)
different
vaccines
across
participating
countries.
This
study
aims
give
an
up
date
and
in-depth
analysis
frequency
ADRs
after
1st,
2nd,
booster
vaccination,
identify
potential
predictors
in
developing
describe
time-to-onset
(TTO)
time-to-recovery
(TTR)
ADRs.
A
CEM
was
rolled
out
period
ranging
from
February
2021
2023
multiple
European
countries;
The
Netherlands,
Belgium,
France,
United
Kingdom,
Italy,
Portugal,
Romania,
Slovakia
Spain.
Analysis
consisted
descriptive
analyses
frequencies
vaccine-related
for
2nd
with
generalized
linear
mixed-effects
model,
TTO
TTR
sensitivity
loss
follow-up
(L2FU).
total
29,837
participants
completed
at
least
baseline
first
questionnaire
1st
vaccination
7,250
booster.
percentage
who
reported
one
ADR
is
74.32%
(95%CI
73.82–74.81).
Solicited
ADRs,
including
injection
site
reactions,
are
very
common
moments.
Potential
these
brand
vaccine
used,
patient's
age,
sex
prior
SARS-CoV-2
infection.
serious
low
(0.24%,
95%CI
0.19––0.31)
(0.26%,
0.15,
0.41).
14
h
(median)
dose
1
slightly
longer
2
dose.
generally
also
within
few
days.
effect
L2FU
on
estimations
limited.
Despite
some
limitations
due
design
study-roll
out,
studies
can
allow
prompt
almost
real-time
observations
safety
medications
directly
patient-centered
perspective,
which
play
crucial
role
regulatory
bodies
during
emergency
setting
such
as
pandemic.
European Respiratory Journal,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
62(5), С. 2300925 - 2300925
Опубликована: Окт. 12, 2023
Background
Longitudinal
cohort
data
of
patients
with
tuberculosis
(TB)
and
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
are
lacking.
In
our
global
study,
we
describe
long-term
outcomes
affected
by
TB
COVID-19.
Methods
We
collected
from
174
centres
in
31
countries
on
all
COVID-19
between
1
March
2020
30
September
2022.
Patients
were
followed-up
until
cure,
death
or
end
time.
All
had
COVID-19;
for
analysis
purposes,
deaths
attributed
to
TB,
both.
Survival
was
performed
using
Cox
proportional
risk-regression
models,
the
log-rank
test
used
compare
survival
mortality
Results
Overall,
788
(active
sequelae)
recruited
countries,
10.8%
(n=85)
died
during
observation
period.
significantly
lower
among
whose
versus
those
dying
because
either
alone
(p<0.001).
Significant
adjusted
risk
factors
higher
age
(hazard
ratio
(HR)
1.05,
95%
CI
1.03–1.07),
HIV
infection
(HR
2.29,
1.02–5.16)
invasive
ventilation
4.28,
2.34–7.83).
For
mortality,
risks
1.03,
1.02–1.04),
male
sex
2.21,
1.24–3.91),
oxygen
requirement
7.93,
3.44–18.26)
2.19,
1.36–3.53).
Conclusions
cohort,
outcome
>10%
A
range
demographic
clinical
predictors
associated
adverse
outcomes.
Nature Communications,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
14(1)
Опубликована: Янв. 6, 2023
Abstract
The
direct
and
indirect
impact
of
the
COVID-19
pandemic
on
population-level
mortality
is
concern
to
public
health
but
challenging
quantify.
Using
data
for
2011–2019,
we
applied
Bayesian
models
predict
expected
number
deaths
in
Switzerland
compared
them
with
laboratory-confirmed
from
February
2020
April
2022
(study
period).
We
estimated
that
COVID-19-related
was
underestimated
by
a
factor
0.72
(95%
credible
interval
[CrI]:
0.46–0.78).
After
accounting
deaths,
observed
−4%
CrI:
−8
0)
lower
than
expected.
deficit
concentrated
age
groups
40–59
(−12%,
95%CrI:
−19
−5)
60–69
(−8%,
−15
−2).
Although
control
measures
may
have
negative
effects,
after
subtracting
there
were
fewer
during
expected,
suggesting
any
effects
offset
positive
effects.
These
results
important
implications
ongoing
debate
about
appropriateness
measures.
About
Us:
The
Ontario
COVID-19
Science
Advisory
Table
is
a
group
of
scientific
experts
and
health
system
leaders
who
evaluate
report
on
emerging
evidence
relevant
to
the
pandemic,
inform
Ontario's
response.Our
mandate
provide
weekly
summaries
for
Health
Coordination
Province
Ontario,
integrating
information
from
existing
tables,
universities
agencies,
best
global
evidence.The
summarizes
its
findings
public
in
Briefs.
Public Health,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
223, С. 193 - 201
Опубликована: Сен. 5, 2023
The
purpose
of
this
study
was
to
assess
the
long-term
effectiveness
COVID-19
pandemic
prevention
measures
in
saving
lives
after
European
governments
began
lift
restrictions.Excess
mortality
interrupted
time
series.Country-level
weekly
data
on
deaths
were
fitted
Poisson
mixed
linear
model
estimate
excess
deaths.
Based
estimate,
percentage
above
baseline
during
(week
11
2020
week
15
2022)
(when
public
health
interventions
place)
and
post-pandemic
period
16
2022
52
calculated.
These
results
regression
determine
any
potential
relationship
between
these
two
periods.The
used
had
high
predictive
value
(adjusted
R2
=
59.4%).
Mortality
endemic
(post-pandemic)
alone
increased
by
7.2%
(95%
confidence
interval
[CI]:
5.7,
8.6)
baseline,
while
each
increase
corresponded
a
0.357%
reduction
CI:
0.243,
0.471)
period.The
most
successful
countries
terms
protective
also
experienced
highest
rates
restrictions
lifted.
clearly
shows
measure
bidirectional
displacement
that
is
sufficiently
clear
mask
impact
long
COVID
overall
mortality.
Results
from
seriously
previous
cost-benefit
analyses
measures,
since,
according
current
model,
12.2%
8.3,
16.1)
gains
achieved
containment
lost
Інфекційні хвороби,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
4, С. 49 - 54
Опубликована: Апрель 14, 2023
З
метою
вивчення
особливостей
клінічного
перебігу
Long-COVID
здійснили
огляд
наукових
публікацій,
які
містять
дані
про
як
окремий
патологічний
стан,
актуальну
інформацію
його
прояви,
та
деякі
патофізіологічні
механізми,
що
призводять
до
розвитку
уражень
серцево-судинної
і
нервової
систем.
Висновки.
Визначення
терміну
окремого
стану
у
коронавірусної
хвороби
відбувалось
кілька
етапів.
Симптоми
пов’язані
з
ураженням
майже
всіх
систем
органів.
Ураження
системи
є
одними
домінуючих,
при
цьому
дані,
механізм
таких
пов’язаний
порушеннями
системі
згортання
крові
утворенням
мікротромбів.
Також
ураження
основною
причиною
смерті
хворих
Long-COVID.
Співвідношення
за
статтю
випадку
однакове,
той
час
системи,
інших
органів
відбувається
переважно
жінок.
Деякі
існуючих
даних
вже
знайшли
додаткове
підтвердження
результатах
останніх
досліджень,
інші
потребують
його.
Journal of Infection and Public Health,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
17(4), С. 719 - 726
Опубликована: Ноя. 3, 2023
Norway
and
Sweden
picked
two
different
ways
to
mitigate
the
dissemination
of
SARS-CoV-2
virus.
introduced
strictest
lockdown
in
Europe
with
strict
border
controls
intense
virus
tracking
all
local
outbreaks
while
did
not.
That
resulted
477
COVID-19
deaths
(Norway)
9737
(Sweden)
2020,
respectively.