Sustainability,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
15(8), С. 6953 - 6953
Опубликована: Апрель 20, 2023
Resilience
measurement
is
an
emerging
topic
in
the
field
of
disaster
risk
reduction.
However,
its
application
Global
South
cities
has
proven
to
be
a
challenge
due
uniqueness
southern
urbanisms
and
data
challenges.
As
result,
Benchmarking
Assessment
Impact
Toolkit
(RABIT)
framework
recently
been
developed
support
resilience
assessment
informal,
marginalized,
disaster-prone
contexts
cities.
This
paper
asserts
relevance
RABIT
uses
it
assess
Manggahan
residences,
resettled
marginalized
community
Pasig
City,
Metro
Manila.
Drawing
on
quantitative
approach
using
exploratory
factor
analysis
(EFA),
study
revealed
that
scale,
robustness,
learning
attributes
are
strong
contributors
community’s
resilience.
Self-organization,
diversity,
redundancy
have
similar
levels
contribution.
Equality
rapidity
were
found
weakest
relative
The
findings
emphasize
need
view
communities
holistically
adopt
integrated
comprehensive
considers
multiple
aspects
everyday
life
proactively
build
adaptive
future
resilient
capacities.
Sustainability,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
14(5), С. 2481 - 2481
Опубликована: Фев. 22, 2022
Urbanization
is
a
continuous
process
for
city’s
economic
development.
Though
rapid
urbanization
provides
huge
employment
opportunity
people,
urban
threats
also
increase
proportionately
due
to
natural
and
man-made
hazards.
Understanding
resilience
sustainability
an
urgent
matter
face
hazards
in
the
rapidly
urbanized
world.
Therefore,
this
study
aims
clarify
concept
develop
key
indications
of
from
existing
literature.
A
systematic
literature
review
guided
by
PRISMA
has
been
conducted
using
1
January
2001
30
November
2021.
It
argues
that
are
interrelated
paradigms
emphasize
system’s
capacity
move
toward
desirable
development
paths.
Resilience
fundamentally
concerned
with
preserving
societal
health
well-being
within
context
broader
framework
environmental
change.
There
significant
differences
their
emphasis
time
scales,
particularly
urbanization.
This
identified
indicators
under
three
major
components
like
adaptive
(education,
health,
food,
water),
absorptive
(community
support,
green
space,
protective
infrastructure,
access
transport),
transformative
(communication
technology,
collaboration
multi-stakeholders,
emergency
services
government,
community-oriented
planning).
several
dimensions
(social,
economic,
environmental)
sustainability.
The
findings
will
be
fruitful
understanding
dynamics
vulnerability
its
measurement
management
strategy
developed
indicators.
Sustainable Cities and Society,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
96, С. 104637 - 104637
Опубликована: Май 9, 2023
Urban
governance
and
planning
systems
are
central
cornerstones
of
international
research
policy
initiatives
to
advance
sustainable
development,
climate
change
adaptation,
disaster
risk
reduction
in
the
context
increasing
global
environmental
change.
Yet,
inherent
processes
components
conventional
systems,
such
as
discourses,
structures,
tools,
practices,
must
be
revised
drive
a
transition
fundamentally
new
arrangements
mechanisms.
We
present
framework
featuring
four
characteristics
for
capacitating
urban
accelerate
shift
toward
transformative
resilience:
foresight
path-shifting,
collaboration
leadership,
creativity
agility,
experimentation
embeddedness.
The
addresses
that
transformed
highlights
mechanisms
required
transformation.
These
include
discourse
reorientation,
structure
reorganization,
tool
innovation,
practice
expansion.
also
underlines
eight
significant
functional,
social,
political,
institutional,
ecological,
technological,
legal,
financial
dimensions
will
used
operationalize
next
step
order
evaluate
associated
opportunities
constraints
current
Environmental Science & Policy,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
145, С. 116 - 128
Опубликована: Апрель 14, 2023
Research
on
cultural
heritage
and
disasters
often
focuses
the
vulnerability
of
ways
to
disaster-proof
it
against
geophysical,
societal,
environmental
hazards.
However,
might
in
turn
also
increase
resilience
communities
which
is
present,
for
example
by
providing
livelihood
diversification,
helping
build
social
connections,
embedding
local
knowledge
past
disasters.
This
study
analysed
how
contribute
multiple
aspects
community
disaster
resilience.
It
builds
an
analysis
disaster-related
four
living
around
Besakih
Temple
located
Mount
Agung
volcano
Bali,
Indonesia,
using
a
mixed-methods
MDSO
(Most
Different
Same
Outcome)
multi-criteria
based
questionnaire-guided
interviews
with
114
respondents.
While
variation
across
sites
as
predicted
theoretical
literature,
varies
considerably
sites,
depending
type
Heritage
had
most
positive
effect
preparedness
institutional
The
results
highlighted
that
connecting
'regular'
management
planning
can
provide
valuable
synergies
Effects
other
were
less
clear
likely
mediated
existing
socio-economic
vulnerabilities
geographical
isolation
some
communities.
Further
research
could
benefit
from
viewing
through
'community
capital'
lens,
including
matters
equitable
access,
capacity-building,
community-based
action,
interactions
between
capital
capitals,
such
social,
economic,
political,
human,
physical,
natural.
Sustainability,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
14(19), С. 11798 - 11798
Опубликована: Сен. 20, 2022
Sustainable
development
and
urban
resilience
are
dominant
planning
paradigms
that
have
become
buzzwords
in
policy
domains
over
the
past
2–3
decades.
While
these
two
been
analyzed
scrutinized
different
studies,
interconnection
between
them
realms
is
understudied.
Compact
expected
to
contribute
a
variety
of
sustainability
goals.
However,
goals’
alignment
with
principles
goals
under
question.
This
research
tries
shed
some
light
on
this
issue.
A
critical
review
method
employed
understand
how
compactness
as
sustainable
relates
dimensions
resilience.
First,
conceptual
theoretical
relationship
compact
city
established.
Next,
resulting
framework
used
critically
analyze
124
articles
from
principles.
Densification
intensification,
mixed
land
use
diversity,
spatial
connectivity
public
transportation
identified
city.
Finally,
explored
assessed
through
examining
selected
literature.
The
results
show
alignments
outcomes
level
may
vary
depending
context,
scale,
or
dimension.
In
other
words,
while
one
scale/dimension
can
increase
specific
adverse
event
stressor,
it
might
vulnerability
others
another
scale/dimension.
From
perspective,
should
clearly
be
defined
priori
reach
favorable
outcomes.
