Biological Conservation,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
264, С. 109396 - 109396
Опубликована: Ноя. 23, 2021
One
of
the
main
goals
EU
Biodiversity
Strategy
for
2030
is
to
avoid
further
loss
biodiversity
and
restore
ecosystems.
These
efforts
can
be
facilitated
by
compiling
research
topics
related
conservation
biology
provide
new
evidence
most
urgent
knowledge
gaps,
publicise
it
researchers,
funders
policy
makers.
We
used
possible
future
statements
from
Hungarian
Environmental
Foresight
Report
2050
which
identified
region-specific
problems.
To
highlight
likely
environmental
questions,
in
this
study
we
asked
researchers
fields
ecology
define
questions
addressing
these
line
with
international
trends
challenges.
The
resulted
fourteen
priority
topics,
split
into
seven
clusters
relevant
biological
that
should
targeted
stakeholders,
primarily
makers
focus
capacity
topics.
overarching
themes
here
include
a
wide
range
approaches
solutions
such
as
innovative
technologies,
involvement
local
stakeholders
citizen
scientists,
legislation,
issues
human
health.
indicate
challenges
require
multidisciplinary
approach
design
multi-actor
implementation.
Although
priorities
were
listed
Hungary,
they
are
European
global
strategies,
tailored
suit
other
Central
Eastern
countries
well.
believe
our
prioritisation
help
science–policy
discussion,
will
eventually
contribute
healthy
well-functioning
Global Change Biology,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
29(3), С. 575 - 589
Опубликована: Ноя. 29, 2022
We
identified
14
emerging
and
poorly
understood
threats
opportunities
for
addressing
the
global
conservation
of
freshwater
mussels
over
next
decade.
A
panel
17
researchers
stakeholders
from
six
continents
submitted
a
total
56
topics
that
were
ranked
prioritized
using
consensus-building
Delphi
technique.
Our
priority
fell
into
five
broad
themes
(autecology,
population
dynamics,
stressors,
diversity,
ecosystem
services)
included
understanding
diets
throughout
mussel
life
history;
identifying
drivers
declines;
defining
metrics
quantifying
health;
assessing
role
predators,
parasites,
disease;
informed
guidance
on
risks
captive
breeding
translocations;
loss
mussel-fish
co-evolutionary
relationships;
effects
increasing
surface
water
changes;
sand
aggregate
mining;
drug
pollution
other
contaminants
such
as
nanomaterials;
appreciating
arising
river
restoration;
conserving
understudied
hotspots
by
building
local
capacity
through
principles
decolonization;
appropriate
taxonomic
units
conservation;
improved
quantification
services
provided
mussels;
how
many
are
enough
to
provide
these
services.
Solutions
ranged
ecological
studies
technological
advances
socio-political
engagement.
Prioritization
our
can
help
drive
proactive
approach
this
declining
group
which
provides
multitude
important
Journal of Applied Ecology,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
59(8), С. 1967 - 1975
Опубликована: Окт. 18, 2021
Abstract
We
introduce
the
concept
of
Biome
Awareness
Disparity
(BAD)—defined
as
a
failure
to
appreciate
significance
all
biomes
in
conservation
and
restoration
policy—and
quantify
disparities
(a)
attention
interest,
(b)
action
(c)
knowledge
among
tropical
science,
practice
policy.
By
analysing
50,000
tweets
from
Partner
Institutions
UN
Decade
Ecosystem
Restoration,
45,000
main
science
environmental
news
media
world‐wide,
we
found
strong
interest
relative
biome
extent
diversity.
Tweets
largely
focused
on
forests,
whereas
open
(such
grasslands,
savannas
shrublands)
received
less
relation
their
area.
In
contrast
these
differences
attention,
there
were
equivalent
likes
retweets
between
forest
versus
biomes,
suggesting
may
not
reflect
views
general
public.
Through
literature
review,
that
experiments
are
disproportionately
concentrated
rainforests,
dry
forests
mangroves.
More
than
half
studies
conducted
reported
tree
planting
action,
inappropriate
application
forest‐oriented
techniques.
Policy
implications
.
urge
scientists,
policymakers
land
managers
recognise
value
for
protecting
biodiversity,
securing
ecosystem
services,
mitigating
climate
change
enhancing
human
livelihoods.
Fixing
will
increase
likelihood
United
Nations
Restoration
successfully
delivering
its
promises.
Insect Conservation and Diversity,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
16(2), С. 173 - 189
Опубликована: Март 1, 2023
Entomology
is
key
to
understanding
terrestrial
and
freshwater
ecosystems
at
a
time
of
unprecedented
anthropogenic
environmental
change
offers
substantial
untapped
potential
benefit
humanity
in
variety
ways,
from
improving
agricultural
practices
managing
vector-borne
diseases
inspiring
technological
advances.We
identified
high
priority
challenges
for
entomology
using
an
inclusive,
open,
democratic
four-stage
prioritisation
approach,
conducted
among
the
membership
affiliates
(hereafter
'members')
UK-based
Royal
Entomological
Society
(RES).A
list
710
was
gathered
189
RES
members.
Thematic
analysis
used
group
suggestions,
followed
by
online
vote
determine
initial
priorities,
which
were
subsequently
ranked
during
workshop
involving
37
participants.The
outcome
set
61
within
four
groupings
related
themes:
(i)
'Fundamental
Research'
(themes:
Taxonomy,
'Blue
Skies'
[defined
as
research
ideas
without
immediate
practical
application],
Methods
Techniques);
(ii)
'Anthropogenic
Impacts
Conservation'
Anthropogenic
Impacts,
Conservation
Options);
(iii)
'Uses,
Ecosystem
Services
Disservices'
Benefits,
Technology
Resources
[use
insects
resource,
or
inspiration],
Pests);
(iv)
'Collaboration,
Engagement
Training'
Knowledge
Access,
Training
Collaboration,
Societal
Engagement).Priority
encompass
questions,
funding
objectives,
new
technologies,
priorities
outreach
engagement.
Examples
include
training
taxonomists,
establishing
global
network
insect
monitoring
sites,
extent
declines,
exploring
roles
cultivated
food
supply
chains,
connecting
professional
with
amateur
entomologists.
Responses
different
could
be
led
entomologists,
all
career
stages.Overall,
provide
diverse
array
options
inspire
initiate
entomological
activities
reveal
contribute
addressing
human
health
well-being,
change.
Journal of Environmental Management,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
352, С. 119897 - 119897
Опубликована: Янв. 6, 2024
Thousands
of
artificial
('human-made')
structures
are
present
in
the
marine
environment,
many
at
or
approaching
end-of-life
and
requiring
urgent
decisions
regarding
their
decommissioning.
No
consensus
has
been
reached
on
which
decommissioning
option(s)
result
optimal
environmental
societal
outcomes,
part,
owing
to
a
paucity
evidence
from
real-world
case
studies.
To
address
this
significant
challenge,
we
asked
worldwide
panel
scientists
provide
expert
opinion.
They
were
identify
characterise
ecosystem
effects
sea,
causes
consequences,
which,
if
any,
should
be
retained
following
Experts
considered
that
most
pressures
driving
ecological
(MAS)
medium
severity,
occur
frequently,
dependent
spatial
scale
with
local-scale
greater
magnitude
than
regional
effects.
The
duration
relatively
short,
order
days.
Overall,
marginally
undesirable,
while
desirable.
therefore
indicated
any
decision
leave
MAS
place
more
beneficial
society
natural
environment.
However,
some
individual
desirable
worthy
retention,
especially
certain
geographic
locations,
where
can
support
improved
trophic
linkages,
increases
tourism,
habitat
provision,
population
size,
stability
dynamics.
analysis
both
negative
positive
for
environment
society,
gives
no
strong
policy
change
whether
removal
retention
is
favoured
until
further
empirical
available
justify
status
quo.
combination
undesirable
associated
challenge
policy-
decision-makers
justification
implement
options.
Decisions
may
need
decided
case-by-case
basis
accounting
trade-off
costs
benefits
local
level.
Conservation Science and Practice,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
4(1)
Опубликована: Ноя. 23, 2021
Abstract
Making
the
reasoning
and
evidence
behind
conservation
management
decisions
clear
transparent
is
a
key
challenge
for
community.
Similarly,
combining
from
diverse
sources
(e.g.,
scientific
local
knowledge)
into
decision‐making
also
difficult.
Our
group
of
researchers
practitioners
has
co‐produced
an
intuitive
tool
template
(Evidence‐to‐Decision
[E2D]
tool:
www.evidence2decisiontool.com
)
to
guide
through
structured
process
transparently
document
report
decisions.
The
three
major
steps:
(1).
Define
Decision
Context;
(2).
Gather
Evidence;
(3).
Make
Evidence‐Based
Decision.
In
each
step,
enter
information
literature,
practitioner
knowledge
experience,
costs)
inform
their
reasoning.
packages
this
customized
downloadable
(or
documented
if
using
offline
template),
which
we
hope
can
stimulate
exchange
on
within
between
organizations.
By
enabling
revisit
how
why
past
were
made,
integrate
forms
evidence,
believe
our
open‐access
tool's
help
increase
transparency
quality
in
conservation.