Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
10(F), С. 690 - 696
Опубликована: Окт. 7, 2022
BACKGROUND:
At
present,
several
active
ingredients
have
been
investigated
in
mouthwashes
having
certain
virucidal
properties,
which
could
reduce
the
viral
load
of
SARS-CoV-2
to
avoid
contamination
medical
or
dental
practice.
AIM:
The
objective
this
review
is
analyze
available
evidence
regarding
and
their
effect
on
salivary
SARS-CoV-2.
METHODS:
Records
were
retrieved
from
databases
such
as
PubMed,
Scopus,
Web
Science,
Virtual
Health
Library
up
June
21,
2022.
Randomized
non-randomized
clinical
trials
included
where
saliva
samples
laboratory
vitro
studies
used
presence
saliva.
RESULTS:
After
a
systematic
selection
process,
11
that
evaluated
at
least
one
mouthwash
within
protocols
three
efficacy
against
finally
included.
CONCLUSION:
There
are
oral
disinfectants
with
action
samples,
under
conditions,
capable
reducing
Cetylpyridinium
chloride,
chlorhexidine,
povidone-iodine
present
best
results
so
far.
However,
it
was
also
possible
find
principles
recent
appearance
that,
based
favorable
exploratory
results,
needs
further
investigation
adverse
events.
Scientific Reports,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
12(1)
Опубликована: Авг. 18, 2022
Cetylpyridinium
chloride
(CPC),
a
quaternary
ammonium
compound,
which
is
present
in
mouthwash,
effective
against
bacteria,
fungi,
and
enveloped
viruses.
This
study
was
conducted
to
explore
the
antiviral
effect
of
CPC
on
SARS-CoV-2.
There
are
few
reports
wild-type
SARS-CoV-2
at
low
concentrations
such
as
0.001%-0.005%
(10-50
µg/mL).
Interestingly,
we
found
that
suppressed
infectivity
human
isolated
strains
(Wuhan,
Alpha,
Beta,
Gamma)
even
saliva.
Furthermore,
demonstrated
shows
anti-SARS-CoV-2
effects
without
disrupting
virus
envelope,
using
sucrose
density
analysis
electron
microscopic
examination.
In
conclusion,
this
provided
experimental
evidence
may
inhibit
infection
lower
concentrations.
Clinical Oral Investigations,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
27(S1), С. 23 - 32
Опубликована: Май 10, 2023
Abstract
Studies
have
shown
that
mouth
and
respiratory
tract
microorganisms
can
be
transported
in
aerosol
spatter.
Due
to
aerosol-generating
procedures,
there
are
potentially
various
infection
risks
for
patients
those
working
health
care,
especially
oral
care.
Dental
contaminate
not
only
the
mucous
membranes
of
health-care
professional’s
mouth,
passages,
eyes
but
also
exposed
surfaces
materials
environment.
As
such,
preventing
disease
transmission
within
offices
is
important
issue.
Since
start
COVID-19
pandemic,
an
innumerable
amount
(mis)information
advice
on
how
stay
safe
prevent
spread
coronavirus
has
been
published.
What
preventive
measures
taken
counteract
this,
what
we
learned
during
pandemic?
This
review
summarizes
relevant
literature
addressed
presence
dispersal
spatter
as
a
concern
It
includes
sources
dental
aerosol,
their
potential
threats,
strategies
controlling
mitigating
impact.
shows
further
research
needed
better
understand
develop
effective
them.
Clinical
relevance
Using
personal
protective
equipment,
high-volume
evacuation
systems
pre-procedural
antimicrobial
agents
help
reduce
settings
protect
well-being
workers
patients.
Abstract
Background
The
risk
of
SARS-COV-2
transmission
is
relatively
high
during
dental
procedures.
A
study
was
conducted
to
investigate
the
effects
mouthwashes
on
viral
load
reduction
in
oral
cavity.
Methods
systematic
search
performed
PubMed,
EMBASE,
Scopus,
Web
Science,
and
Cochrane
library
for
relevant
studies
up
20
July,
2022.
Randomized
non-randomized
clinical
trial
quasi-experimental
evaluating
patients
with
Covid-19
infection
(patients)
who
used
(intervention)
compared
same
before
using
mouthwash
(comparison)
reducing
or
increasing
cycle
threshold
(Ct)
value
(outcome)
were
searched
according
PICO
components.
Three
independent
reviewers
literature
screening
data
extraction.
Modified
Downs
Black
checklist
quality
assessment.
meta-analysis
a
random
model
Revman
5.4.1software
mean
difference
(MD)
values.
Results
Of
1653
articles,
9
methodological
included.
indicated
that
1%
Povidone-iodine
(PVP-I)
an
effective
[MD
3.61
(95%
confidence
interval
1.03,
6.19)].
Cetylpyridinium
chloride
(CPC)
0.61
-1.03,
2.25)]
Chlorhexidine
gluconate
(CHX)
-0.04
95%
(-1.20,
1.12)]
not
against
SARS-COV-2.
Conclusion
Using
containing
PVP-I
may
be
recommended
cavity
procedures,
while
evidence
sufficient
such
CPC
CHX-containing
mouthwashes.
Japanese Dental Science Review,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
59, С. 334 - 356
Опубликована: Окт. 11, 2023
To
evaluate
the
effectiveness
of
antiseptic
mouthwashes
in
reducing
SARS-CoV-2
load
clinically
and
vitro.
A
systematic
electronic
search
(MEDLINE/Scopus/Cochrane)
was
conducted
to
identify
prospective
clinical
vitro
studies
published
between
2019
included
16
June
2023
assessing
saliva
or
surrogates.
Data
were
summarized
tables
a
network
meta-analysis
performed
for
trials.
Thirty-five
(14
RCTs,
21
vitro)
fulfilled
inclusion
criteria.
The
risk
bias
judged
be
high
2
7
studies.
most
commonly
test
product
chlorhexidine
alone
combination
with
other
active
ingredients,
followed
by
povidone-iodine,
hydrogen
peroxide
cetylpyridinium
chloride.
Overall,
descriptive
analysis
revealed
decreasing
salivary
viral
both
Network
demonstrated
degree
heterogeneity.
Among
these
studies,
only
0.20%
associated
significant
Ct
increase
5
min
after
rinsing
compared
non-active
control
(p
=
0.027).
from
suggested
antiviral
efficacy
used
mouthwashes.
Large
well-balanced
trials
are
needed
best
protocols.
Pathogens,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
12(2), С. 211 - 211
Опубликована: Янв. 29, 2023
The
rapid
rollout
of
COVID-19
vaccines
in
2021
sparked
general
optimism
toward
controlling
the
severe
form
disease,
preventing
hospitalizations
and
COVID-19-associated
mortality,
transmissibility
SARS-CoV-2
infection
[...]
Viruses,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
15(7), С. 1433 - 1433
Опубликована: Июнь 25, 2023
The
oral
cavity
is
particularly
susceptible
to
viral
infections
that
are
self-recovering
in
most
cases.
However,
complications
may
appear
severe
cases
and/or
immunocompromised
subjects.
Cetylpyridinium
chloride
(CPC)-containing
mouthwashes
able
decrease
the
infectivity
of
SARS-CoV-2
virus
by
disrupting
integrity
envelope.
Here,
we
show
CPC,
as
active
ingredient
contained
commercialized,
exerts
significant
antiviral
activity
against
enveloped
viruses,
such
HSV-1,
but
not
non-enveloped
HPV.
CPC-containing
have
been
used
antiseptics
for
decades,
and
thus,
they
can
represent
a
cost-effective
measure
limit
infection
spread
viruses
infecting
cavity,
aiding
reducing
transmission.
Journal of Medical Virology,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
94(10), С. 4654 - 4668
Опубликована: Июнь 27, 2022
Given
the
high
transmissibility
of
severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
coronavirus
2
(SARS-CoV-2)
as
witnessed
early
in
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic,
concerns
arose
with
existing
methods
for
virus
disinfection
and
decontamination.
The
need
SARS-CoV-2-specific
data
stimulated
considerable
research
this
regard.
Overall,
SARS-CoV-2
is
practically
equally
susceptible
to
approaches
decontamination
that
have
been
previously
found
other
human
or
animal
coronaviruses.
latter
included
techniques
utilizing
temperature
modulation,
pH
extremes,
irradiation,
chemical
treatments.
These
physicochemical
are
a
necessary
adjunct
prevention
strategies,
given
environmental
patient
surface
ubiquity
virus.
Classic
studies
also
allowed
extrapolation
eradication
on
mucosal
surfaces
by
some
means.
Despite
laboratory
study,
practical
field
assessments
generally
lacking
be
encouraged
confirm
correlation
interventions
viral
infection
prevention.
Transparency
constitution
use
any
method
essential
furthering
applications.
Abstract
Background
The
efficacy
of
mouth-rinses
strongly
depends
upon
their
substantivity.
use
natural
and
non-toxic
products
that
avoid
secondary
effects
is
gaining
interest
in
preventive
dentistry.
purpose
this
study
was
to
evaluate
the
substantivity
two
formulations
mouth-washing
solutions
based
on
cetylpyridinium
(CPC)
O-cymen-5-ol.
Methods
This
a
randomized,
double-blind,
crossover
trial
conducted
at
Faculty
Medicine
Health
Sciences
University
Barcelona.
Bacterial
re-colonization
followed
by
live/dead
(SYTO
TM
9
+
propidium
iodide)
bacterial
staining
measured
confocal
laser
scanning
microscopy
fluorometry.
Unstimulated
saliva
samples
were
collected
from
16
healthy
individuals
baseline
then,
15
min,
30
min
1,
2,
3,
4
h
after
following
mouth-rinses:
(i)
single,
1-min
mouth-rinse
with
ml
placebo
(negative
control);
(ii)
CPC
(0.05%)
;
(iii)
O-cymen-5-ol
(0.09%);
(iv)
(0.09%).
Results
Proportion
dead
bacteria
significantly
higher
for
all
mouthrinses
during
first
compared
(CPC
=
48.0
±
13.9;
95%
CI
40.98–56.99;
p
<
0.001,
79.8
21.0;
67.71–91.90;
0.05,
49.4
14;
0.001
fluorometry
54.8
23.0;
41.50–68.06;
76.3
17.1;
66.36–86.14;
47.4
11.9;
40.49–54.30;
microscopy,
respectively).
Nevertheless,
h,
only
one
obtained
significant
values
as
quantification
methods
used
(80.3
22.8;
67.15–93.50;
0.05
81.4
13.8;
73.45–89.43;
0.05).
combined
increased
mouthrinse
respect
prepared
either
active
alone.
Conclusion
synergistic
interaction
prolongs
resulting
formulation
may
be
effective
other
antimicrobials,
such
triclosan
or
chlorhexidine,
but
without
undesirable
effects.
Thus,
mouthrinsing
Combinations
replace
near
future
Triclosan
Chlorhexidine—based
mouthrinses.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
19(19), С. 12148 - 12148
Опубликована: Сен. 25, 2022
Severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome-coronavirus-2
(SARS-CoV-2)
is
a
global
and
evolving
pandemic
associated
with
heavy
health
financial
burdens.
Considering
the
oral
cavity
as
major
reservoir
for
SARS-CoV-2,
systematic
review
meta-analysis
were
conducted
to
assess
efficacy
of
mouth
rinses
nasal
sprays
in
reducing
salivary
viral
load
SARS-CoV-2.
All
vivo
vitro
studies
that
assessed
virucidal
against
SARS-CoV-2
published
English
language
from
December
2019
April
2022
considered
analyses.
Special
Medical
Subject
Headings
terms
used
search
Pubmed,
Scopus,
Embase
Ovid,
Web
Science
databases.
The
toxicological
data
reliability
assessment
tool
(ToxRToool)
was
quality
included
studies.
Thirty-three
(11
22
vitro)
deemed
eligible
inclusion
this
analysis.
Results
pooled
showed
povidone-iodine
most
efficacious
intervention
load,
followed
by
chlorhexidine.
mean
difference
86%
72%,
respectively.
Similarly,
highest
log10
reduction
value
(LRV)
vitro,
cetylpyridinium
chloride,
(LRV
=
2.938
(p
<
0.0005)
LRV
2.907
0.009),
respectively).
Povidone-iodine-based
preparations
favourable
results
loads
both
vitro.
limited
number
patients
vivo,
further
among
larger
cohorts
are
recommended.