Different
regions
of
the
striatum
regulate
different
types
behavior.
However,
how
dopamine
signals
differ
across
striatal
and
regulates
behaviors
remain
unclear.
Here,
we
compared
axon
activity
in
ventral,
dorsomedial,
dorsolateral
striatum,
while
mice
performed
a
perceptual
value-based
decision
task.
Surprisingly,
was
similar
all
three
areas.
At
glance,
multiplexed
variables
such
as
stimulus-associated
values,
confidence,
reward
feedback
at
phases
Our
modeling
demonstrates,
however,
that
these
modulations
can
be
inclusively
explained
by
moment-by-moment
changes
expected
reward,
is
temporal
difference
error.
A
major
between
areas
overall
level
responses:
responses
were
positively
shifted,
lacking
inhibitory
to
negative
prediction
errors.
The
differences
put
specific
constraints
on
properties
controlled
regions.
Neuron,
Год журнала:
2020,
Номер
108(5), С. 999 - 1010.e6
Опубликована: Окт. 12, 2020
Recent
animal
research
indicates
that
dopamine
and
serotonin,
neuromodulators
traditionally
linked
to
appetitive
aversive
processes,
are
also
involved
in
sensory
inference
decisions
based
on
such
inference.
We
tested
this
hypothesis
humans
by
monitoring
sub-second
striatal
serotonin
signaling
during
a
visual
motion
discrimination
task
separates
uncertainty
from
decision
difficulty
factorial
design.
Caudate
nucleus
recordings
(n
=
4)
revealed
multi-scale
encoding:
three
participants,
tracked
uncertainty,
and,
one
participant,
both
deviations
expected
trial
transitions
within
our
Putamen
1)
supported
cognition-action
separation
between
caudate
putamen—a
sub-division
unique
primates—with
tracking
times.
These
first-of-their-kind
observations
the
human
brain
reveal
role
for
non-reward-based
aspects
of
cognition
action.
Journal of Neuroscience,
Год журнала:
2017,
Номер
37(45), С. 10826 - 10834
Опубликована: Ноя. 8, 2017
A
substantial
portion
of
our
sensory
experience
happens
during
active
behaviors
such
as
walking
around
or
paying
attention.
How
do
systems
work
behaviors?
Neural
processing
in
can
be
shaped
by
behavior
multiple
ways
ranging
from
a
modulation
responsiveness
sharpening
tuning
to
dynamic
change
response
properties
functional
connectivity.
Here,
we
review
recent
findings
on
the
different
systems:
insect
vision,
rodent
thalamus,
and
cortices.
We
discuss
circuit-level
mechanisms
that
might
lead
these
modulations
their
potential
role
function.
Finally,
highlight
open
questions
future
perspectives
this
exciting
new
field.
Neuron,
Год журнала:
2019,
Номер
103(3), С. 489 - 505.e7
Опубликована: Июнь 13, 2019
Highlights•Fear
learning
selectively
engages
the
anatomically
distinct
DRN→BA
5-HT
pathway•The
pathway
bidirectionally
modulates
fear
and
extinction•The
sculpts
fear-associated
neuronal
activity
in
BA•The
expresses
VGluT3
but
drives
via
BA
5-HT1A/2A
receptorsSummaryDespite
a
wealth
of
clinical
preclinical
data
implicating
serotonin
(5-HT)
system
fear-related
affective
disorders,
precise
definition
this
neuromodulator's
role
remains
elusive.
Using
convergent
anatomical
functional
approaches,
we
interrogate
contribution
to
basal
amygdala
(BA)
inputs
from
dorsal
raphe
nucleus
(DRN).
We
show
is
engaged
during
memory
formation
retrieval,
these
projections
facilitates
impairs
extinction.
The
amplifies
firing
theta
power
phase-locking.
Although
recruits
co-expressing
DRN
neurons,
fear-potentiating
influence
requires
signaling
at
receptors.
Input-output
mapping
illustrates
how
connected
with
other
brain
regions
that
mediate
fear.
These
findings
reveal
discrete
circuit
orchestrates
broader
neural
network
calibrate
aversive
memory.Graphical
abstract
Nature Communications,
Год журнала:
2018,
Номер
9(1)
Опубликована: Май 8, 2018
Abstract
Learning
to
predict
future
outcomes
is
critical
for
driving
appropriate
behaviors.
Reinforcement
learning
(RL)
models
have
successfully
accounted
such
learning,
relying
on
reward
prediction
errors
(RPEs)
signaled
by
midbrain
dopamine
neurons.
It
has
been
proposed
that
when
sensory
data
provide
only
ambiguous
information
about
which
state
an
animal
in,
it
can
based
a
set
of
probabilities
assigned
hypothetical
states
(called
the
belief
state).
Here
we
examine
how
RPEs
and
subsequent
are
regulated
under
uncertainty.
Mice
first
trained
in
task
with
two
potential
defined
different
amounts.
During
testing,
intermediate-sized
rewards
given
rare
trials.
Dopamine
activity
non-monotonic
function
size,
consistent
RL
operating
states.
Furthermore,
magnitude
responses
quantitatively
predicts
changes
behavior.
These
results
establish
role
inference
RL.
Different
regions
of
the
striatum
regulate
different
types
behavior.
However,
how
dopamine
signals
differ
across
striatal
and
regulates
behaviors
remain
unclear.
Here,
we
compared
axon
activity
in
ventral,
dorsomedial,
dorsolateral
striatum,
while
mice
performed
a
perceptual
value-based
decision
task.
Surprisingly,
was
similar
all
three
areas.
At
glance,
multiplexed
variables
such
as
stimulus-associated
values,
confidence,
reward
feedback
at
phases
Our
modeling
demonstrates,
however,
that
these
modulations
can
be
inclusively
explained
by
moment-by-moment
changes
expected
reward,
is
temporal
difference
error.
A
major
between
areas
overall
level
responses:
responses
were
positively
shifted,
lacking
inhibitory
to
negative
prediction
errors.
The
differences
put
specific
constraints
on
properties
controlled
regions.