Journal of Gerontological Nursing,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
49(8), P. 19 - 26
Published: July 31, 2023
Cannabis
use
is
on
the
rise
among
adults
and
older
managing
chronic
health
conditions
in
United
States.
There
limited
understanding
of
this
trend
factors
influencing
cannabis
care
community.
The
current
study
explores
perceptions
experiences
with
who
regularly.
Case
data
were
gathered
through
interviews
guided
by
Biopsychosocial
Model.
Biological,
psychological,
social
reasons
for
emerged
interviews.
Despite
reporting
adverse
events,
was
reported
as
an
effective
treatment
participants'
issues,
participants
more
comfortable
its
compared
to
prescription
medications.
A
feeling
autonomy
contributed
being
perceived
positive.
rising
Primary
providers
must
regularly
screen
identify
appropriate
inappropriate
patterns.
[Journal
Gerontological
Nursing,
49(8),
19-26.].
JAMA Network Open,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
6(8), P. e2328934 - e2328934
Published: Aug. 29, 2023
Medical
and
nonmedical
cannabis
use
disorders
(CUD)
have
increased
with
increasing
legalization.
However,
the
prevalence
of
CUD
among
primary
care
patients
who
for
medical
or
reasons
is
unknown
in
states
legal
recreational
use.To
estimate
severity
report
only,
both
a
state
use.This
cross-sectional
survey
study
took
place
at
an
integrated
health
system
Washington
State.
Among
108
950
adult
completed
routine
screening
from
March
2019
to
September
2019,
5000
were
selected
confidential
using
stratified
random
sampling
frequency
past-year
race
ethnicity.
1688
respondents,
1463
reporting
past
30-day
included
study.Patient
survey-reported
reason
30
days:
reasons.Patient
responses
Composite
International
Diagnostic
Interview-Substance
Abuse
Module
CUD,
corresponding
Statistical
Manual
Mental
Disorders,
Fifth
Edition
(0-11
symptoms)
categorized
as
any
(≥2
moderate
severe
(≥4
symptoms).
Adjusted
analyses
weighted
stratification
nonresponse
population
estimates
compared
across
use.Of
(weighted
mean
[SD]
age,
47.4
[16.8]
years;
748
[weighted
proportion,
61.9%]
female)
used
cannabis,
42.4%
(95%
CI,
31.2%-54.3%)
reported
25.1%
17.8%-34.2%)
32.5%
25.3%-40.8%)
use.
The
was
21.3%
15.4%-28.6%)
did
not
vary
groups.
6.5%
5.0%-8.6%)
differed
groups:
1.3%
0.0%-2.8%)
use,
7.2%
3.9%-10.4%)
7.5%
5.7%-9.4%)
(P
=
.01).In
this
common
cannabis.
Moderate
more
prevalent
These
results
underscore
importance
assessing
patient
symptoms
settings.
JAMA Network Open,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
6(5), P. e2316283 - e2316283
Published: May 26, 2023
Substance
use
disorders
(SUDs)
are
underrecognized
in
primary
care,
where
structured
clinical
interviews
often
infeasible.
A
brief,
standardized
substance
symptom
checklist
could
help
clinicians
assess
SUD.To
evaluate
the
psychometric
properties
of
Use
Symptom
Checklist
(hereafter
checklist)
used
care
among
patients
reporting
daily
cannabis
and/or
other
drug
as
part
population-based
screening
and
assessment.This
cross-sectional
study
was
conducted
adult
who
completed
during
routine
between
March
1,
2015,
2020,
at
an
integrated
health
system.
Data
analysis
from
June
2021,
to
May
2022.The
included
11
items
corresponding
SUD
criteria
Diagnostic
Statistical
Manual
for
Mental
Disorders
(Fifth
Edition)
(DSM-5).
Item
response
theory
(IRT)
analyses
tested
whether
unidimensional
reflected
a
continuum
severity
evaluated
item
characteristics
(discrimination
severity).
Differential
functioning
examined
performed
similarly
across
age,
sex,
race,
ethnicity.
Analyses
were
stratified
by
use.A
total
23
304
screens
(mean
[SD]
38.2
[5.6]
years;
12
554
[53.9%]
male
patients;
17
439
[78.8%]
White
20
393
[87.5%]
non-Hispanic
patients).
Overall,
16
140
reported
only,
4791
2373
both
use.
Among
with
or
use,
4242
(26.3%),
1446
(30.2%),
1229
(51.8%),
respectively,
endorsed
2
more
on
checklist,
consistent
DSM-5
SUD.
For
all
subsamples,
IRT
models
supported
unidimensionality
discriminated
higher
lower
levels
severity.
observed
some
sociodemographic
subgroups
but
did
not
result
meaningful
change
(<1
point
difference)
overall
score
(0-11).In
this
study,
administered
screening,
expected
well
subgroups.
Findings
support
utility
complete
assessment
make
diagnostic
treatment
decisions
care.
JAMA Network Open,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
7(6), P. e2414809 - e2414809
Published: June 5, 2024
Importance
Despite
the
changing
legal
status
of
cannabis
and
potential
impact
on
health,
few
health
systems
routinely
screen
for
use,
data
epidemiology
especially
medical
use
among
primary
care
patients,
are
limited.
Objective
To
describe
prevalence
of,
factors
associated
with,
reasons
past–3
month
reported
by
patients.
Design,
Setting,
Participants
This
cross-sectional
study
used
electronic
record
from
patients
aged
18
years
older
who
had
an
annual
wellness
visit
between
January
2021
May
2023
a
clinic
within
university-based
system
in
Los
Angeles,
California.
Exposures
Factors
interest
included
age,
race
ethnicity,
sex,
employment
status,
neighborhood
Area
Deprivation
Index
(ADI).
Main
Outcomes
Measures
Cannabis
was
assessed
using
Alcohol
Substance
Involvement
Screening
Test
(ASSIST).
Patients
were
also
asked
about
symptoms
which
they
cannabis,
mode
use.
Results
Among
175
734
screened,
median
(range)
age
47
(18-102)
years;
101
657
(58.0%)
female;
25
278
(15.7%)
Asian,
21
971
(13.7%)
Hispanic,
51
063
(31.7%)
White.
29
898
(17.0%),
with
10
360
(34.7%)
having
ASSIST
scores
indicative
moderate
to
high
risk
disorder
(CUD).
Prevalence
higher
male
than
female
(14
939
[20.0%]
vs
14
916
[14.7%])
younger
(18-29
years,
7592
[31.0%];
≥60
4200
[8.5%]),
lower
those
lived
most
disadvantaged
neighborhoods
(ADI
decile
9-10,
189
[13.8%];
ADI
1-2,
12
431
[17.4%]).
The
common
modes
edibles
(18
201
[61.6%]),
smoking
(15
256
[51.7%]),
vaporizing
(8555
[29.0%]).
While
4375
(15.6%)
did
so
only,
986
(75.7%)
manage
including
pain
(9196
[31.7%]),
stress
542
[50.2%]),
sleep
(16
221
[56.0%]).
(IQR)
number
managed
2
(1-4),
at
CUD
(4
[2-6]
symptoms).
Conclusions
Relevance
In
this
study,
common,
more
three-quarters
any
doing
health-related
symptom.
These
findings
suggest
that
integration
information
regarding
symptom
management
could
help
provide
crucial
point-of-care
opportunity
clinicians
understand
their
patients’
CUD.
Substance Use & Addiction Journal,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: May 5, 2025
Background:
The
Tobacco,
Alcohol,
Prescription
Medication,
and
Other
Substance
(TAPS)
tool
is
a
screening
brief
assessment
instrument
to
identify
unhealthy
tobacco,
alcohol,
drug
use,
prescription
medication
use
in
primary
care
patients.
This
secondary
analysis
compares
the
TAPS
Alcohol
Use
Disorders
Identification
Test-Consumption
(AUDIT-C)
for
alcohol
screening.
Methods:
Adult
patients
(1124
female,
874
male)
completed
followed
by
AUDIT-C.
Performance
of
each
was
evaluated
against
reference
standard
measure,
modified
World
Mental
Health
Composite
International
Diagnostic
Interview,
problem
disorder
(AUD).
Area
under
curve
(AUC)
appraised
discrimination,
sensitivity
specificity
were
calculated
Youden
optimal
score
thresholds.
Results:
For
identifying
use:
On
AUDIT-C,
AUC
0.90
(95%
Confidence
Interval:
0.86-0.92)
females
0.91
(0.89-0.93)
males.
Sensitivity
0.89
(0.83-0.93)
0.78
(0.75-0.80),
respectively,
males
0.84
(0.79-0.88)
0.82
(0.79-0.85).
tool,
(0.79-0.86)
0.81
(0.78-0.84)
(0.72-0.84)
(0.75-0.81),
0.76
(0.71-0.81)
(0.72-0.79).
AUD:
(0.88-0.93)
both
0.83
(0.74-0.90)
(0.80-0.85),
while
males,
they
(0.74-0.87)
(0.81-0.87).
(0.80-0.89)
(0.78-0.86)
0.73
(0.63-0.81)
0.85
(0.83-0.88),
0.75
(0.68-0.81)
(0.81-0.86).
Conclusion:
AUDIT-C
performed
somewhat
better
than
However,
had
an
acceptable
level
performance
may
be
advantageous
practice
settings
seeking
other
substance
with
single
instrument.
JAMA Network Open,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
8(5), P. e2510173 - e2510173
Published: May 14, 2025
Importance
Little
is
known
about
patterns
(forms,
frequency,
and
reasons)
factors
associated
with
cannabis
use
in
older
veterans
(aged
≥65
years).
Objective
To
examine
past
30-day
disorder
(CUD)
veterans.
Design,
Setting,
Participants
In
this
cross-sectional
study,
community-dwelling
adults
aged
65
to
84
years
who
used
Veterans
Health
Administration
care
were
interviewed
between
February
5,
2020,
August
29,
2023.
Exposure
Sociodemographic,
behavioral,
health-related
characteristics.
Main
Outcomes
Measures
Past
(smoking,
vaping,
dabbing,
or
edibles)
any
CUD
(≥2
criteria
based
on
Diagnostic
Statistical
Manual
of
Mental
Disorders
[Fifth
Edition])
assessed
using
weighted
multivariable
logistic
regressions.
Results
Of
the
4503
participants
(weighted
mean
age,
73.3
[95%
CI,
73.0-73.5
years];
85.4%
83.6%-87.2%]
men),
58.2%
(95%
55.3%-61.0%)
had
ever
cannabis,
28.9%
26.0%-31.8%)
whom
reported
for
medical
reasons,
most
commonly
pain
(56.4%;
95%
50.9%-61.9%),
mood
mental
health
(18.4%;
14.7%-22.1%),
sleep
(16.0%;
11.9%-20.0%).
More
than
1
10
(10.3%;
8.9%-11.7%),
52.4%
45.4%-59.4%)
these
20
days
more;
smoking
(72.4%;
65.4%-79.3%)
edibles
(36.9%;
29.8%-43.9%)
common
forms
use.
Characteristics
included
younger
age
(65-75
years),
economic
hardship,
tobacco
illicit
drug
use,
residing
a
state
recreationally
legal
cannabis.
Among
those
36.3%
30.1%-42.6%)
screened
positive
CUD,
higher
odds
among
respondents,
reporting
anxiety,
more
deficits
activities
daily
living,
frequent
recreationally.
inhaled
compared
only,
was
increased
(adjusted
ratio,
3.56;
1.12-11.26).
Conclusions
Relevance
study
veterans,
common,
one-third
30
CUD.
The
prevalence
close
prevalence,
risk
similar
observed
other
populations.
Frequent
Routine
screening
clinical
settings
necessary
identify
Substance Use & Misuse,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 1 - 7
Published: May 18, 2025
The
Stages
of
Change
(SoC)
model
explains
addictive
behavior
change
through
5
stages:
precontemplation,
contemplation,
preparation,
action,
and
maintenance.
Limited
evidence
exists
from
randomized
controlled
trials
testing
the
SoC
in
Cannabis
Use
Disorder
(CUD)
treatments.
aim
this
study
was
to
test
indirect
effects
Peer
Network
Counseling-
text
(PNC-txt),
a
text-message
delivered
motivational
interviewing
informed
treatment
for
cannabis
use
disorder,
advancing
participants
SoC.
Design
two-arm
clinical
trial
CUD
with
1078
U.S.
young
adults.
Participants
were
allocated
4
wk
PNC-txt
or
wait-list
control
condition
followed
6
months.
Urine
drug
tests
presence
THC
metabolites
self-reported
days
used
past
30
outcome
variables.
measured
Marijuana
Ladder,
as
dichotomized
mediator
variable
representing
Cognitive
stage
(precontemplation,
preparation
=
0)
Behavioral
(action,
maintenance
1).
Mediation
analysis
showed
Action/Maintenance
at
1-month
post
baseline
had
50%
lower
odds
highest
level
metabolite
(300
ng/ml)
result
reported
using
fewer
compared
controls
Results
suggest
that
increased
motivation
resulting
SoC,
explaining
decreases
use.
Findings
provide
novel
biological
support
modifiable
mechanism
when
treating
Abstract
Background
The
prevalence
and
associated
overdose
death
rates
from
opioid
use
disorder
(OUD)
have
dramatically
increased
in
the
last
decade.
Despite
more
available
treatments
than
20
years
ago,
treatment
access
high
discontinuation
are
challenges,
as
personalized
medication
dosing
making
timely
changes
when
fail.
In
other
fields
such
depression,
brief
measures
to
address
these
tasks
combined
with
an
action
plan—so-called
measurement-based
care
(MBC)—have
been
better
outcomes.
This
workgroup
aimed
determine
whether
can
be
identified
for
using
MBC
optimizing
or
informing
decisions
OUD.
Methods
National
Institute
on
Drug
Abuse
Center
Clinical
Trials
Network
(NIDA
CCTN)
2022
convened
a
small
develop
consensus
about
clinically
usable
improve
quality
of
delivery
methods
Two
clinical
were
addressed:
(1)
identify
optimal
dose
medications
OUD
each
patient
(2)
estimate
effectiveness
particular
once
implemented,
granular
fashion
binary
categories
early
sustained
remission
no
found
Diagnostic
Statistical
Manual
Mental
Disorders,
fifth
edition
(DSM-5).
Discussion
Five
parameters
recommended
personalize
adjustment:
withdrawal
symptoms,
use,
magnitude
(severity
duration)
subjective
effects
opioids
used,
craving,
side
effects.
A
rating
OUD-specific
parameter
adjust
global
assessment
verbal
question
side-effects
was
viewed
sufficient.
Whether
ratings
produce
outcomes
(e.g.,
engagement
retention)
practice
deserves
study.
There
that
core
signs
symptoms
based
some
5
DSM-5
domains
withdrawal)
should
basis
assessing
outcome.
No
existing
measure
meet
all
recommendations.
Next
steps
would
select,
adapt
de
novo
items/brief
scales
inform
decision-making
effectiveness.
Psychometric
testing,
acceptability
produces
symptom
control,
life
(QoL),
daily
function
prognosis
compared
usual
investigation.