Buprenorphine/Naloxone vs Methadone for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder
Bohdan Nosyk,
No information about this author
Jeong Eun Min,
No information about this author
Fahmida Homayra
No information about this author
et al.
JAMA,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Oct. 17, 2024
Importance
Previous
studies
on
the
comparative
effectiveness
between
buprenorphine
and
methadone
provided
limited
evidence
differences
in
treatment
effects
across
key
subgroups
were
drawn
from
populations
who
use
primarily
heroin
or
prescription
opioids,
although
fentanyl
is
increasing
North
America.
Objective
To
assess
risk
of
discontinuation
mortality
among
individuals
receiving
buprenorphine/naloxone
vs
for
opioid
disorder.
Design,
Setting,
Participants
Population-based
retrospective
cohort
study
using
linked
health
administrative
databases
British
Columbia,
Canada.
The
included
recipients
January
1,
2010,
March
17,
2020,
18
years
older
not
incarcerated,
pregnant,
palliative
cancer
care
at
initiation.
Exposures
Receipt
incident
(first-time)
users
prevalent
new
(including
first
subsequent
attempts).
Main
Outcomes
Measures
Hazard
ratios
(HRs)
with
95%
compatibility
(confidence)
intervals
estimated
(lasting
≥5
days
≥6
buprenorphine/naloxone)
all-cause
within
24
months
discrete-time
survival
models
comparisons
medications
as
assigned
initiation
regardless
adherence
(“initiator”)
received
according
to
dosing
guidelines
(approximating
per-protocol
analysis).
Results
A
total
30
891
(39%
buprenorphine/naloxone;
66%
male;
median
age,
33
[25th-75th,
26-43]
years)
initiator
analysis
25
614
analysis.
Incident
had
a
higher
compared
analyses
(88.8%
81.5%
discontinued
months;
adjusted
HR,
1.58
[95%
CI,
1.53-1.63]),
change
estimates
when
evaluated
optimal
dose
(42.1%
30.7%;
1.67
1.58-1.76]).
Per-protocol
while
exhibited
ambiguous
results
(0.08%
0.13%
0.57
0.24-1.35])
0.09%;
0.97
0.54-1.73]).
consistent
after
introduction
patient
sensitivity
analyses.
Conclusions
Relevance
was
associated
lower
buprenorphine/naloxone.
similar
methadone,
CI
estimate
hazard
ratio
wide.
Language: Английский
“If it wasn’t for them, I don’t think I would be here”: experiences of the first year of a safer supply program during the dual public health emergencies of COVID-19 and the drug toxicity crisis
Gillian Kolla,
No information about this author
Bernie Pauly,
No information about this author
Fred Cameron
No information about this author
et al.
Harm Reduction Journal,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
21(1)
Published: June 7, 2024
In
response
to
the
devastating
drug
toxicity
crisis
in
Canada
driven
by
an
unregulated
opioid
supply
predominantly
composed
of
fentanyl
and
analogues,
safer
programs
have
been
introduced.
These
provide
people
using
street-acquired
opioids
with
prescribed,
pharmaceutical
opioids.
We
use
six
core
components
identified
who
drugs
explore
participant
perspectives
on
first
year
operations
a
program
Victoria,
BC,
during
dual
public
health
emergencies
COVID-19
examine
whether
met
drug-user
defined
elements
effective
model.
Language: Английский
Comparative effectiveness of methadone take-home dose initiation in British Columbia, Canada: protocol for a population-based retrospective cohort study using target trial guidelines
Md. Belal Hossain,
No information about this author
Brenda Carolina Guerra‐Alejos,
No information about this author
Megan Kurz
No information about this author
et al.
BMJ Open,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
15(3), P. e095198 - e095198
Published: March 1, 2025
Due
to
inferior
safety
profile
and
higher
risk
of
diversion
than
buprenorphine/naloxone,
guidelines
typically
recommend
stringent
eligibility
criteria
such
as
daily
witnessed
ingestion
methadone
for
at
least
12
weeks
before
considering
take-home
doses.
Recent
research
has
focused
on
whether
or
not
initiate
doses,
often
using
pandemic-era
data
when
temporary
prescribing
changes
provided
a
natural
experiment
the
impact
access
However,
none
these
studies
adequately
examined
optimal
timing
safely
starting
doses
enhance
treatment
outcomes.
To
determine
initiating
we
will
compare
effects
different
initiation
times
time
discontinuation,
all-cause
mortality
acute-care
visits
among
individuals
who
completed
induction
in
British
Columbia,
Canada,
from
2010
2022.
We
propose
emulating
target
trial
linked
population-level
health
administrative
all
aged
18
older
living
completing
between
1
January
31
December
The
exposure
strategies
include
no
dosing
dose
≤4,
5-12,
13-24
25-52
since
induction.
outcomes
visits.
per-protocol
analysis
with
clone-censor-weighting
approach
address
immortal
bias
implicit
comparison
alternative
times.
Subgroup
sensitivity
analyses,
including
cohort
restrictions,
study
timeline
variations,
modifications
outcome
reclassifications,
are
proposed
assess
robustness
our
results.
protocol,
creation
plan
have
been
classified
approved
quality
improvement
initiative
by
Providence
Health
Care
Research
Ethics
Board
Simon
Fraser
University
Office
Ethics.
Results
be
disseminated
local
advocacy
groups
decision-makers,
national
international
clinical
guideline
developers,
presented
conferences
published
peer-reviewed
journals.
Language: Английский
Opioid medication doses among safer supply clients: Current safer supply doses and previous OAT experience
Gillian Kolla,
No information about this author
Kaitlin Fajber,
No information about this author
Andrea Sereda
No information about this author
et al.
Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 100338 - 100338
Published: April 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Short-Acting, Full Agonist Opioids During Initiation of Opioid Agonist Treatment in the Fentanyl Era
JAMA Network Open,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
7(5), P. e2411398 - e2411398
Published: May 15, 2024
Jeong
Eun
Min,
MSc;
Brenda
Carolina
Guerra-Alejos,
MD,
MPH;
Ruyu
Yan,
BA;
Heather
Palis,
PhD;
Brittany
Barker,
Karen
Urbanoski,
Bernie
Pauly,
RN,
Amanda
Slaunwhite,
Paxton
Bach,
Corey
Ranger,
RN;
Ashley
Heaslip,
Bohdan
Nosyk,
PhD
Language: Английский