Cited by Christmas greetings 2024 from the Editor-in-Chief

Peer Review na Sinapse: Garantindo a Qualidade na Publicação DOI

Helena Donato, Filipe Palavra

Sinapse, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 24(4), P. 145 - 147

Published: Jan. 16, 2025

Citations

Peer Review in the Artificial Intelligence Era: A Call for Developing Responsible Integration Guidelines DOI

Ahmed S. BaHammam

Nature and Science of Sleep, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: Volume 17, P. 159 - 164

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

Cutting-edge AI tools revolutionizing scientific research in life sciences DOI

Katarzyna Lorenc-Kukula

BioTechnologia, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: March 7, 2025

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a transformative force in the life sciences, pushing boundaries of possibility. Imagine AI automating time-consuming tasks, uncovering hidden patterns vast datasets, designing proteins minutes instead years, and even predicting disease outbreaks before they occur. This review explores latest tools revolutionizing scientific fields, including research data analysis, healthcare, supporting writing. Beyond processing, reshaping how scientists draft share their findings, enhancing processes ranging from literature reviews to citation management. However, with great power comes responsibility. Are we prepared for this leap? delves into forefront where innovation meets

Language: Английский

Citations

Retractions in Otolaryngology Publications DOI

Shaun Edalati, Tony K.H. Chung,

Maya Govindaraj

et al.

JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: March 13, 2025

Objective To characterize trends in otolaryngology (ear, nose, and throat [ENT]) retractions, identify underlying causes, compare retraction rates with similar specialties. Design, Setting, Participants A scoping review of retracted articles published from January 1, 1974, through December 31, 2023, was carried out. Retraction data were obtained the Crossref/Retraction Watch database corresponding abstracts retrieved PubMed. Publication Scopus. All related to ENT identified. Articles neurosurgery ophthalmology similarly for comparison. withdrawn routine updates, expressions concern, reinstatements, corrections excluded. The on 3, 2024. Main Outcomes Measures primary outcomes annual rate (proportion per total articles) reasons (categorized as intentional misconduct, procedural unintentional errors, or unknown). Secondary measures included time publication comparisons rates. Results Of 481 215 articles, 471 (0.10%) retracted. Retractions increased over time, peaking 2022 a 0.42%. Among most common misconduct (233 [49.50%]) (210 [44.60%]). first authors China accounted largest share (243 [51.60%]) these retractions. Basic science head neck cancer research represented subspecialty category (161 [34.20%]). median (IQR) 21.8 (10.8-55.3) months. Conclusions Relevance This analysis found that retractions literature have 5 decades, predominantly driven by misconduct. These findings highlight need enhanced oversight, training, editorial vigilance maintain integrity protect patient welfare.

Language: Английский

Citations

Artificial Intelligence and Peer Review DOI