Drugs,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
84(3), P. 285 - 304
Published: March 1, 2024
Currently,
there
are
four
monoclonal
antibodies
(mAbs)
that
target
the
cluster
of
differentiation
(CD)
20
receptor
available
to
treat
multiple
sclerosis
(MS):
rituximab,
ocrelizumab,
ofatumumab,
and
ublituximab.
B-cell
depletion
therapy
has
changed
therapeutic
landscape
MS
through
robust
efficacy
on
clinical
manifestations
MRI
lesion
activity,
currently
anti-CD20
mAb
therapies
for
use
in
a
cornerstone
highly
effective
disease-modifying
treatment.
Ocrelizumab
is
only
with
regulatory
approval
primary
progressive
MS.
There
few
data
regarding
relative
these
therapies,
though
several
trials
ongoing.
Safety
concerns
applicable
this
class
therapeutics
relate
primarily
immunogenicity
mechanism
action,
include
infusion-related
or
injection-related
reactions,
development
hypogammaglobulinemia
(leading
increased
infection
malignancy
risk),
decreased
vaccine
response.
Exploration
alternative
dose/dosing
schedules
might
be
an
strategy
mitigating
risks.
Future
biosimilar
medications
make
more
readily
available.
Although
have
led
significant
improvements
disease
outcomes,
CNS-penetrant
still
needed
effectively
address
compartmentalized
inflammation
thought
play
important
role
disability
progression.
Brain,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
145(9), P. 3147 - 3161
Published: Jan. 28, 2022
Patients
with
multiple
sclerosis
acquire
disability
either
through
relapse-associated
worsening
(RAW)
or
progression
independent
of
relapse
activity
(PIRA).
This
study
addresses
the
relative
contribution
relapses
to
over
course
disease,
how
early
begins
and
extent
which
therapies
delay
accumulation.
Using
Novartis-Oxford
(NO.MS)
data
pool
spanning
all
phenotypes
paediatric
sclerosis,
we
evaluated
∼200
000
Expanded
Disability
Status
Scale
(EDSS)
transitions
from
>27
patients
≤15
years
follow-up.
We
analysed
three
datasets:
(i)
A
full
analysis
dataset
containing
observational
randomized
controlled
clinical
trials
in
were
assessed
(n
=
27
328);
(ii)
phase
3
8346);
(iii)
placebo-controlled
4970).
determined
importance
RAW
PIRA,
investigated
role
on
all-cause
using
Andersen-Gill
models
observed
impact
mechanism
disease-modifying
time
reach
milestone
levels
continuous
Markov
models.
PIRA
started
disease
process,
occurred
became
principal
driver
accumulation
progressive
disease.
Relapses
significantly
increased
hazard
events;
following
a
year
(versus
without
relapses),
by
31-48%
(all
P
<
0.001).
Pre-existing
older
age
risk
factors
for
incomplete
recovery.
For
placebo-treated
minimal
(EDSS
1),
it
took
8.95
until
limitation
walking
ability
4)
18.48
require
assistance
6).
Treating
delayed
these
times
3.51
(95%
confidence
limit:
3.19,
3.96)
3.09
(2.60,
3.72),
respectively.
In
relapsing-remitting
those
who
worsened
exclusively
due
events
similar
length
EDSS
values
compared
fastest
superimposed
relapses.
Our
confirm
that
contribute
disability,
primarily
sclerosis.
becomes
dominant
as
evolves.
are
further
The
use
delays
accrual
years,
potential
gain
being
highest
earliest
stages
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
15
Published: Jan. 1, 2022
Using
a
philosophical
approach
or
deductive
reasoning,
we
challenge
the
dominant
clinico-radiological
worldview
that
defines
multiple
sclerosis
(MS)
as
focal
inflammatory
disease
of
central
nervous
system
(CNS).
We
provide
range
evidence
to
argue
‘real
MS’
is
in
fact
driven
primarily
by
smouldering
pathological
process.
In
natural
history
studies
and
clinical
trials,
relapses
activity
revealed
magnetic
resonance
imaging
(MRI)
MS
patients
on
placebo
disease-modifying
therapies
(DMTs)
were
found
be
poor
predictors
long-term
evolution
dissociated
from
disability
outcomes.
addition,
progressive
accumulation
can
occur
independently
relapse
early
course.
This
scenario
underpinned
more
diffuse
process
may
affect
entire
CNS.
Many
putative
drivers
potentially
modified
specific
therapeutic
strategies,
an
have
major
implications
for
management
patients.
hypothesise
therapeutically
targeting
state
‘no
evident
activity’
(NEIDA)
cannot
sufficiently
prevent
MS,
meaning
treatment
should
also
focus
other
brain
spinal
cord
processes
contributing
slow
loss
neurological
function.
complemented
with
holistic
systemic
been
shown
worsen
Neurology,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
97(8), P. 378 - 388
Published: June 4, 2021
In
most
cases,
multiple
sclerosis
(MS)
begins
with
a
relapsing-remitting
course
followed
by
insidious
disability
worsening
that
is
independent
from
clinically
apparent
relapses
and
termed
secondary
progressive
MS
(SMPS).
Major
differences
exist
between
(RRMS)
SPMS,
especially
regarding
therapeutic
response
to
treatment.
This
review
provides
an
overview
of
the
pathology,
differentiation,
challenges
in
diagnosis
treatment
SPMS.
We
emphasize
criticality
conversion
disease
not
only
because
such
evidence
progression,
but
also
because,
until
recently,
treatments
effectively
reduced
progression
relapsing
were
proven
be
effective
Clear
clinical,
imaging,
immunologic,
or
pathologic
criteria
marking
transition
RRMS
SPMS
have
yet
been
established.
Early
identification
will
require
tools
that,
together
use
appropriate
treatments,
may
result
better
long-term
outcomes
for
population
patients
Brain,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
144(10), P. 2954 - 2963
Published: June 26, 2021
Abstract
Multiple
sclerosis
is
a
highly
heterogeneous
disease,
and
the
detection
of
neuroaxonal
damage
as
well
its
quantification
critical
step
for
patients.
Blood-based
serum
neurofilament
light
chain
(sNfL)
currently
under
close
investigation
an
easily
accessible
biomarker
prognosis
treatment
response
in
patients
with
multiple
sclerosis.
There
abundant
evidence
that
sNfL
levels
reflect
ongoing
inflammatory-driven
(e.g.
relapses
or
MRI
disease
activity)
predict
activity
over
next
few
years.
In
contrast,
association
long-term
clinical
outcomes
ability
to
slow,
diffuse
neurodegenerative
less
clear.
However,
early
results
from
real-world
cohorts
trials
using
marker
are
encouraging.
Importantly,
algorithms
should
now
be
developed
incorporate
routine
use
guide
individualized
decision-making
people
sclerosis,
together
additional
fluid
biomarkers
measures.
Here,
we
propose
specific
scenarios
where
implementing
measures
may
utility,
including,
among
others:
initial
diagnosis,
first
choice,
surveillance
subclinical
guidance
therapy
selection.
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
14
Published: Jan. 1, 2021
Multiple
sclerosis
is
a
complex,
autoimmune-mediated
disease
of
the
central
nervous
system
characterized
by
inflammatory
demyelination
and
axonal/neuronal
damage.
The
approval
various
disease-modifying
therapies
our
increased
understanding
mechanisms
evolution
in
recent
years
have
significantly
changed
prognosis
course
disease.
This
update
Sclerosis
Therapy
Consensus
Group
treatment
recommendation
focuses
on
most
important
recommendations
for
multiple
2021.
Our
are
based
current
scientific
evidence
apply
to
those
medications
approved
wide
parts
Europe,
particularly
German-speaking
countries
(Germany,
Austria,
Switzerland).
JAMA Neurology,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
80(2), P. 151 - 151
Published: Dec. 19, 2022
Progression
independent
of
relapse
activity
(PIRA)
is
the
main
event
responsible
for
irreversible
disability
accumulation
in
relapsing
multiple
sclerosis
(MS).To
investigate
clinical
and
neuroimaging
predictors
PIRA
at
time
first
demyelinating
attack
factors
associated
with
long-term
outcomes
people
who
present
PIRA.This
cohort
study,
conducted
from
January
1,
1994,
to
July
31,
2021,
included
patients
a
sclerosis;
were
recruited
1
study
center
Spain.
Patients
excluded
if
they
refused
participate,
had
alternative
diagnoses,
did
not
meet
protocol
requirements,
inconsistent
demographic
information,
or
less
than
3
assessments.Exposures
(1)
features
(2)
presenting
PIRA,
ie,
confirmed
(CDA)
free-relapse
period
any
after
symptom
onset,
within
(vs
after)
5
years
disease
(ie,
early/late
PIRA),
presence
absence)
new
T2
lesions
previous
2
active/nonactive
PIRA).Expanded
Disability
Status
Scale
(EDSS)
yearly
increase
rates
since
adjusted
hazard
ratios
(HRs)
EDSS
6.0.Of
1128
(mean
[SD]
age,
32.1
[8.3]
years;
781
female
individuals
[69.2%])
277
(25%)
developed
more
events
median
(IQR)
follow-up
7.2
(4.6-12.4)
(for
PIRA).
Of
all
86
(31%)
early
73
144
(51%)
active
PIRA.
slightly
older,
brain
lesions,
likely
have
oligoclonal
bands
those
without
Older
age
was
only
predictor
(HR,
1.43;
95%
CI,
1.23-1.65;
P
<
.001
each
older
decade).
steeper
(0.18;
0.16-0.20
vs
0.04;
0.02-0.05;
.001)
an
8-fold
greater
risk
reaching
6.0
7.93;
2.25-27.96;
=
Early
late
(0.31;
0.26-0.35
0.13;
0.10-0.16;
26-fold
26.21;
2.26-303.95;
.009).Results
this
suggest
that
sclerosis,
uncommon
suggests
unfavorable
prognosis,
especially
it
occurs
course.
Neurodegeneration
and
astrocytic
activation
are
pathologic
hallmarks
of
progressive
multiple
sclerosis
(MS)
can
be
quantified
by
serum
neurofilament
light
chain
(sNfL)
glial
fibrillary
acidic
protein
(sGFAP).
We
investigated
sNfL
sGFAP
as
tools
for
stratifying
patients
with
MS
based
on
progression
disease
activity
status.We
leveraged
our
Comprehensive
Longitudinal
Investigation
at
the
Brigham
Women's
Hospital
(CLIMB)
natural
history
study,
which
includes
clinical,
MRI
data
samples
collected
over
more
than
20
years.
included
a
confirmed
Expanded
Disability
Status
Scale
(EDSS)
score
≥3
that
corresponds
classifier
high
risk
underlying
pathology.
analyzed
within
6
months
from
EDSS
corresponding
baseline
visit.
Patients
who
further
developed
6-month
disability
(6mCDP)
were
classified
progressors.
stratified
into
active/nonactive
new
brain/spinal
cord
lesions
or
relapses
in
2
years
before
during
follow-up.
Statistical
analysis
log-transformed
sGFAP/sNfL
assessed
association
demographic,
features
associations
future
disability.We
257
had
an
average
4.0
median
follow-up
after
7.6
was
higher
(adjusted
β
=
1.21;
95%
CI
1.04-1.42;
p
0.016),
first
1.17;
1.01-1.36;
0.042).
not
increased
presence
activity.
Higher
levels,
but
associated
6mCDP
hazard
ratio
[HR]
1.71;
1.19-2.45;
0.004).
The
stronger
low
HR
2.44;
1.32-4.52;
0.005)
nonactive
prior
sample.Higher
levels
correlated
subsequent
progression,
particularly
patients,
whereas
reflected
acute
Thus,
may
used
to
stratify
clinical
research
studies
trials
inform
care.