Neurology International,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
16(6), P. 1421 - 1437
Published: Nov. 11, 2024
Background:
The
utility
of
single-pulse
TMS
(transcranial
magnetic
stimulation)-evoked
EEG
(electroencephalograph)
potentials
(TEPs)
has
been
extensively
studied
in
the
past
three
decades.
TEPs
have
shown
to
provide
insights
into
features
cortical
excitability
and
connectivity,
reflecting
mechanisms
excitatory/inhibitory
balance,
various
neurological
psychiatric
conditions.
In
present
study,
we
sought
review
summarize
most
clinical
indications
utilizing
TEP
describe
its
promise
as
an
informative
novel
tool
for
evaluation
brain
physiology.
Methods:
A
thorough
search
PubMed,
Embase,
Google
Scholar
original
research
TMS-EEG
measurement
was
conducted.
Our
focused
on
outcomes
clinically
relevant,
commonly
studied,
well-supported
scientifically.
Results:
We
included
a
total
55
publications
summarized
them
by
application.
categorized
these
seven
sub-sections:
healthy
aging,
Alzheimer’s
disease
(AD),
disorders
consciousness
(DOCs),
stroke
rehabilitation
recovery,
major
depressive
disorder
(MDD),
Parkinson’s
(PD),
well
prediction
monitoring
treatment
response.
Conclusions:
is
useful
underlying
neuronal
networks.
It
may
be
utilized
several
applications.
Its
prominent
uses
include
levels
DOCs,
response
MDD,
diagnosis
AD.
Additional
applications
including
diagnostic
aid
PD,
also
encouraging
results
but
require
further
evidence
from
randomized
controlled
trials
(RCTs).
Epilepsia,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: April 23, 2025
Abstract
The
International
League
Against
Epilepsy
(ILAE)
has
updated
the
operational
classification
of
epileptic
seizures,
building
upon
framework
established
in
2017.
This
revision,
informed
by
implementation
experience,
involved
a
working
group
appointed
ILAE
Executive
Committee.
Comprising
37
members
from
all
regions,
utilized
modified
Delphi
process,
requiring
consensus
threshold
more
than
two
thirds
for
any
proposal.
Following
public
comments,
Committee
seven
additional
experts
to
revision
task
force
address
and
incorporate
issues
raised,
as
appropriate.
maintains
four
main
seizure
classes:
Focal,
Generalized,
Unknown
(whether
focal
or
generalized),
Unclassified.
Taxonomic
rules
distinguish
classifiers,
which
are
considered
reflect
biological
classes
directly
impact
clinical
management,
descriptors,
indicate
other
important
characteristics.
Focal
seizures
those
unknown
origin
further
classified
patient's
state
consciousness
(impaired
preserved)
during
seizure,
defined
operationally
through
assessment
awareness
responsiveness.
If
is
undetermined,
under
parent
term,
that
is,
class
(focal
origin).
Generalized
grouped
into
absence
generalized
tonic–clonic
now
including
recognition
negative
myoclonus
type.
Seizures
described
basic
version
with
without
observable
manifestations,
whereas
an
expanded
utilizes
chronological
sequence
semiology.
comprises
21
types.
Special
emphasis
was
placed
on
ensuring
translatability
languages
beyond
English.
Its
aim
establish
common
language
health
care
professionals
epilepsy
care,
resource‐limited
areas
highly
specialized
centers,
provide
accessible
terms
patients
caregivers.
Nature Medicine,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
30(8), P. 2349 - 2355
Published: May 30, 2024
Abstract
Accurately
predicting
functional
outcomes
for
unresponsive
patients
with
acute
brain
injury
is
a
medical,
scientific
and
ethical
challenge.
This
prospective
study
assesses
how
multimodal
approach
combining
various
numbers
of
behavioral,
neuroimaging
electrophysiological
markers
affects
the
performance
outcome
predictions.
We
analyzed
data
from
349
admitted
to
tertiary
neurointensive
care
unit
between
2009
2021,
categorizing
prognoses
as
good,
uncertain
or
poor,
compared
these
predictions
observed
using
Glasgow
Outcome
Scale–Extended
(GOS-E,
levels
ranging
1
8,
higher
indicating
better
outcomes).
After
excluding
cases
life-sustaining
therapy
withdrawal
mitigate
self-fulfilling
prophecy
bias,
our
findings
reveal
that
good
prognosis,
poor
one,
associated
one-year
(common
odds
ratio
(95%
CI)
GOS-E:
OR
=
14.57
(5.70–40.32),
P
<
0.001;
2.9
(1.56–5.45),
0.001,
respectively).
Moreover,
increasing
number
assessment
modalities
decreased
uncertainty
(OR
0.35
(0.21–0.59),
0.001)
improved
prognostic
accuracy
2.72
(1.18–6.47),
0.011).
Our
results
underscore
value
in
refining
neuroprognostic
precision,
thereby
offering
robust
foundation
clinical
decision-making
processes
acutely
brain-injured
patients.
ClinicalTrials.gov
registration:
NCT04534777
.
Neurology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
104(4)
Published: Jan. 30, 2025
Determining
the
level
of
consciousness
in
patients
with
brain
injury-and
more
fundamentally,
establishing
what
they
can
experience-is
ethically
and
clinically
impactful.
Patient
behaviors
may
unreliably
reflect
their
consciousness:
a
subset
unresponsive
demonstrate
covert
by
willfully
modulating
activity
to
commands
through
fMRI
or
EEG.
However,
current
paradigms
for
assessing
remain
fundamentally
limited
because
are
insensitive,
rely
on
imperfect
assumptions
functional
neuroanatomy,
do
not
spectrum
conscious
experience.
Neural
decoding,
which
stimuli
concepts
reconstructed
from
activity,
offers
novel
approach
assessment
that
overcomes
many
these
limitations.
In
this
article,
we
discuss
state
assessments,
shortcomings,
science
neural
potential
application
decoding
disorders
consciousness,
future
directions
help
realize
potential.
To
so,
searched
PubMed
Google
Scholar
databases
pertinent
articles
published
between
January
1990
September
2024,
using
search
terms
"covert
consciousness,"
"cognitive
motor
dissociation,"
"neural
decoding,"
"semantic
decoding."
Redefining
improve
sensitivity,
enhance
granularity,
directly
address
question
experience
after
injury.
Neurology Clinical Practice,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(6)
Published: Aug. 16, 2024
Neuroprognostication
for
disorders
of
consciousness
(DoC)
after
severe
acute
brain
injury
is
a
major
challenge,
and
the
conventional
clinical
approach
struggles
to
keep
pace
with
rapidly
evolving
literature.
Lacking
specialization,
fragmented
between
providers,
neuroprognostication
variable,
frequently
incongruent
guidelines,
prone
error,
contributing
avoidable
mortality
morbidity.
medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: March 5, 2025
Abstract
Objective
Determine
whether
acute
behavioral,
electroencephalography
(EEG),
and
functional
MRI
(fMRI)
biomarkers
of
consciousness
are
associated
with
outcome
after
severe
traumatic
brain
injury
(TBI).
Methods
Patients
TBI
admitted
consecutively
to
the
intensive
care
unit
(ICU)
participated
in
a
multimodal
battery
assessing
behavioral
level
(Coma
Recovery
Scale-Revised
[CRS-R]),
cognitive
motor
dissociation
(CMD;
task-based
EEG
fMRI),
covert
cortical
processing
(CCP;
stimulus-based
default
mode
network
connectivity
(DMN;
resting-state
fMRI).
The
primary
was
6-month
Disability
Rating
Scale
(DRS)
total
scores.
Results
We
enrolled
55
patients
TBI.
Six-month
available
45
(45.2±20.7
years
old,
70%
male),
whom
10
died,
all
due
withdrawal
life-sustaining
treatment
(WLST).
Behavioral
presence
command-following
ICU
were
each
lower
(i.e.,
better)
DRS
scores
(p=0.003,
p=0.011).
fMRI
did
not
strengthen
this
relationship,
but
higher
DMN
better
recovery
on
multiple
secondary
measures.
In
subsample
participants
without
CRS-R,
CMD
(EEG:18%;
fMRI:33%)
CCP
(EEG:91%;
fMRI:79%)
outcome,
an
unexpected
result
that
may
reflect
high
rate
WLST.
However,
(ρ[95%CI]=-0.41[-0.707,
-0.027];
p=0.046)
group.
Interpretation
Standardized
assessment
improve
prediction
from
Further
research
is
required
determine
integrating
EEG,
more
predictive
than
alone.
Resuscitation Plus,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 100932 - 100932
Published: March 1, 2025
Neuroprognostication
for
disorders
of
consciousness,
particularly
after
cardiac
arrest,
is
critical.
However
rapidly
evolving
research
has
translated
little
to
clinical
practice,
with
neuroprognostication
frequently
deviating
from
evidence
and
guidelines.
We
implemented
a
novel
program
that
provides
specialized,
interdisciplinary,
longitudinal
care
improve
the
practice
neuroprognostication.
The
objective
this
study
was
evaluate
impact
on
provider
attitudes
satisfaction
towards
arrest.
disseminated
surveys
across
our
health
system
critical
providers
neurologists
in
years
before
(2021,
2022)
(2023)
implementation
program.
assessed
perceptions
of,
with,
used
Fisher
exact
tests
compare
program-exposed
respondents
historical
controls
(2021
2022
respondents)
contemporary
(2023
without
exposure).
received
545
responses
providers,
including
nurses,
trainees,
attendings.
Program-exposed
respondents,
relative
respectively,
reported
greater
usefulness
(94%
reporting
often
or
always
useful,
versus
69%
[p
<
0.01])
68%
0.01]),
comprehensiveness
comprehensive,
76%
=
0.02]
66%
neuroprognostication,
comparison
conventional
model
(63%
"much
better").
Implementation
specialized
associated
largely
favorable
among
providers.
These
findings
encourage
further
paradigm,
consideration
broader
adoption