BMC Psychology,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
10(1)
Published: Nov. 1, 2022
Conspiracy
theories
can
have
particularly
harmful
effects
by
negatively
shaping
health-related
behaviours.
A
significant
number
of
COVID-19
specific
conspiracy
emerged
in
the
immediate
aftermath
pandemic
outbreak.
The
aim
this
study
was
to
systematically
review
literature
on
related
during
first
year
(2020),
identify
their
prevalence,
determinants
and
public
health
consequences.
comprehensive
search
carried
out
PubMed
PsycINFO
detect
all
studies
examining
any
theory
between
January
1st
2020,
10th
2021.
Forty-three
were
included
with
a
total
61,809
participants.
Between
0.4
82.7%
participants
agreed
at
least
one
belief.
Certain
sociodemographic
factors
(young
age,
female
gender,
being
non-white,
lower
socioeconomic
status),
psychological
aspects
(pessimism,
blaming
others,
anger)
other
qualities
(political
conservatism,
religiosity,
mistrust
science
using
social
media
as
source
information)
associated
increased
acceptance
theories.
beliefs
led
behaviours
posed
serious
threat.
Large-scale
collaborations
governments
healthcare
organizations
are
needed
curb
spread
adverse
Social Science & Medicine,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
301, P. 114912 - 114912
Published: March 14, 2022
Belief
in
COVID-19
conspiracy
theories
can
have
severe
consequences;
it
is
therefore
crucial
to
understand
this
phenomenon,
its
similarities
with
general
belief,
but
also
how
context-dependent.
The
aim
of
systematic
review
provide
a
comprehensive
overview
the
available
research
on
beliefs
and
synthesise
make
widely
accessible.
We
present
synthesis
belief
from
85
international
articles,
identified
appraised
through
review,
line
contemporary
protocols
guidelines
for
reviews.
identify
number
potential
antecedents
(individual
differences,
personality
traits,
demographic
variables,
attitudes,
thinking
styles
biases,
group
identity,
trust
authorities,
social
media
use),
their
consequences
(protective
behaviours,
self-centred
misguided
behaviours
such
as
hoarding
pseudoscientific
health
practices,
vaccination
intentions,
psychological
wellbeing,
other
negative
discrimination
violence),
effect
sizes
relations
beliefs.
conclude
that
understanding
both
they
are
context-dependent
highly
important
tackle
them,
whether
pandemic
or
future
threats,
climate
change.
Social Psychological and Personality Science,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
13(1), P. 49 - 59
Published: March 19, 2021
During
COVID-19,
conspiracy
theories
were
intensely
discussed
in
the
media.
Generally,
both
believing
(i.e.,
explanations
for
events
based
on
powerholders’
secret
arrangements)
and
being
confronted
with
a
theory
have
been
found
to
predict
cognition
behavior
negative
societal
effects,
such
as
low
institutional
trust.
Accordingly,
around
COVID-19
should
reduce
trust,
support
of
governmental
regulations
their
adoption,
social
engagement
(e.g.,
helping
members
risk
groups).
We
tested
these
predictions
national
random
sample
survey,
an
experiment,
longitudinal
study
(
N
total
=
1,213;
all
studies
preregistered).
Indeed,
decreased
regulations,
adoption
physical
distancing,
and—to
some
extent—social
engagement.
Findings
underscore
severe
effects
context
COVID-19.
Applied Cognitive Psychology,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
35(2), P. 486 - 496
Published: Nov. 29, 2020
In
the
coronavirus
"infodemic,"
people
are
exposed
to
official
recommendations
but
also
potentially
dangerous
pseudoscientific
advice
claimed
protect
against
COVID-19.
We
examined
whether
irrational
beliefs
predict
adherence
COVID-19
guidelines
as
well
susceptibility
such
misinformation.
Irrational
were
indexed
by
belief
in
conspiracy
theories,
knowledge
overestimation,
type
I
error
cognitive
biases,
and
intuition.
Participants
(
Health Communication,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
36(1), P. 6 - 14
Published: Nov. 22, 2020
Wide-spread
misinformation
about
the
COVID-19
pandemic
has
presented
challenges
for
communicating
public
health
recommendations.
Should
campaigns
to
promote
protective
behaviors
focus
on
debunking
or
targeting
behavior-specific
beliefs?
To
address
this
question,
we
examine
whether
belief
in
is
directly
associated
with
two
(face
mask
wearing
and
social
distancing),
beliefs
can
account
association
better
predict
behavior,
consistent
behavior-change
theory.
We
conducted
a
nationally
representative
two-wave
survey
of
U.S.
adults
from
5/26/20-6/12/20
(n
=
1074)
7/15/20-7/21//20
889;
follow-up
response
83%).
Scales
were
developed
validated
related
beliefs,
distancing
face
wearing,
consequences
both
behaviors.
Cross-lagged
panel
linear
regression
models
assessed
relationships
among
variables.
While
was
negatively
(B
−.27,
SE
=.06)
social-distancing
−.46,
=.08)
measured
at
same
time,
did
not
concurrent
lagged
behavior
when
incorporated
models.
Beliefs
behavioral
outcomes
accounted
distancing,
cross-sectionally
=.43,
=.05;
B
=.63,
=.09)
over
time
=.20,
04;
=.30,
=.08).
In
conclusion,
COVID-19-related
less
relevant
behaviors,
but
these
are
important
predictors.
With
regard
misinformation,
recommend
aimed
promoting
emphasize
benefits
rather
than
unrelated
false
claims.
Journal of Medical Internet Research,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
23(1), P. e23805 - e23805
Published: Dec. 10, 2020
Background
Misinformation
about
COVID-19
is
common
and
has
been
spreading
rapidly
across
the
globe
through
social
media
platforms
other
information
systems.
Understanding
what
public
knows
identifying
beliefs
based
on
misinformation
can
help
shape
effective
health
communications
to
ensure
efforts
reduce
viral
transmission
are
not
undermined.
Objective
This
study
aimed
investigate
prevalence
factors
associated
with
in
Australia
their
changes
over
time.
Methods
prospective,
longitudinal
national
survey
was
completed
by
adults
(18
years
above)
April
(n=4362),
May
(n=1882),
June
(n=1369)
2020.
Results
Stronger
agreement
younger
age,
male
gender,
lower
education
level,
language
than
English
spoken
at
home
(P<.01
for
all).
After
controlling
these
variables,
were
significantly
(P<.001)
levels
of
digital
literacy,
perceived
threat
COVID-19,
confidence
government,
trust
scientific
institutions.
Analyses
specific
government-identified
revealed
3
clusters:
prevention
(associated
gender
age),
causation
level
greater
disadvantage),
cure
age).
Lower
institutional
rejection
official
government
accounts
stronger
misinformation.
Conclusions
The
findings
this
highlight
important
gaps
communication
effectiveness,
which
must
be
addressed
prevention.
BMC Public Health,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
21(1)
Published: April 8, 2021
Abstract
Background
We
investigated
if
people’s
response
to
the
official
recommendations
during
COVID-19
pandemic
is
associated
with
conspiracy
beliefs
related
COVID-19,
a
distrust
in
sources
providing
information
on
and
an
endorsement
of
complementary
alternative
medicine
(CAM).
Methods
The
sample
consisted
1325
Finnish
adults
who
filled
out
online
survey
marketed
Facebook.
Structural
regression
analysis
was
used
investigate
whether:
1)
beliefs,
sources,
CAM
predict
non-pharmaceutical
interventions
(NPIs)
implemented
by
government
pandemic,
2)
are
willingness
take
vaccine.
Results
Individuals
more
lower
trust
were
less
likely
have
positive
NPIs.
unwilling
Distrust
strongest
most
consistent
predictor
all
models.
Our
analyses
also
revealed
that
some
people
respond
negatively
NPIs
likelihood
This
association
partly
sources.
Conclusions
Distrusting
establishment
provide
accurate
information,
believing
theories,
endorsing
treatments
substances
not
part
conventional
medicine,
negative
guidelines
COVID-19.
How
guidelines,
however,
strongly
consistently
degree
they
feel
than
their
tendency
hold
or
endorse
CAM.
These
findings
highlight
need
for
governments
health
authorities
create
communication
strategies
build
public
trust.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
17(21), P. 7818 - 7818
Published: Oct. 26, 2020
An
overwhelming
flood
of
misinformation
is
accompanying
the
pandemic
COVID-19.
Fake
news
and
conspiracy
theories
are
so
prevalent
that
World
Health
Organization
started
as
early
February
2020
to
use
term
"infodemic".
This
paper
focused
on
assessment
prevalence
beliefs
in
related
COVID-19
Polish
society.
The
association
support
for
with
sociodemographic
variables,
health
literacy
(HL)
eHealth
(eHL)
was
studied.
analysis
reported
here
based
data
from
an
online
survey
a
representative
sample
(