The influence of relative pubertal maturity on executive function development in adolescent girls DOI Creative Commons
Patrícia Gerván, Gyöngyi Oláh, Katinka Utczás

et al.

Scientific Reports, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 14(1)

Published: Nov. 15, 2024

A positive association between pubertal maturity as assessed by skeletal development, and specific cognitive abilities has recently been demonstrated in a cohort of adolescent girls. The current study explores the impact chronological age relative on executive function within same cohort. Relative maturity, determined difference age, establishes criteria for enrolling participants into average, advanced, or delayed subgroups. Performance is using Numerical Stroop test analyzed across four conditions, each with varying task requirements related to inhibition switching. effects functions are tested linear mixed model. Within examined age-range (12–15 y), more protracted development was found compared In line previous findings, results reveal significant performance also effect executing functioning. interaction Chronological Age Maturity suggests that degree interplay these factors varies range. Specifically, may have noticeable EF functioning middle adolescence early adolescence.

Language: Английский

Navigating Pubertal Goldilocks: The Optimal Pace for Hierarchical Brain Organization DOI Creative Commons
Hanna Szakács, Murat Can Mutlu, Giulio Balestrieri

et al.

Advanced Science, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 11(21)

Published: March 15, 2024

Abstract Adolescence is a timed process with an onset, tempo, and duration. Nevertheless, the temporal dimension, especially pace of maturation, remains insufficiently studied aspect developmental progression. The primary objective to estimate precise influence pubertal maturational tempo on configuration associative brain regions. To this end, connection between stages level hierarchical organization large‐scale networks in 12‐13‐year‐old females analyzed. Skeletal maturity used as proxy for progress. degree defined by difference bone age chronological age. assess brain, dynamic closed eye resting state high‐density electroencephalography (EEG) alpha frequency range Different levels order are captured measured asymmetry directionality information flow different calculated EEG‐based entropy production participant groups then compared accelerated, average, decelerated maturity. Results indicate that average trajectory optimally aligns cerebral order, both accelerated timelines result diminished cortical organization. This suggests “Goldilocks rule” development favoring particular tempo.

Language: Английский

Citations

3

The contributions of biological maturity and experience to fine motor development in adolescence DOI Creative Commons
Andrea Berencsi, Ferenc Gombos,

Lili Julia Fehér

et al.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Sept. 3, 2024

Abstract Fine motor function develops into adulthood, but little is known about the differential effects of biological maturation and experience on speed complex sequential performance hand. To determine maturity levels, ultrasonic bone age (BA) was assessed in 225 adolescents (123 females; BA range: 9.9 to 17.9 years). The role evaluated based chronological (CA, 11.1 16.5 years), musical instrumental experience, handedness. Multiple linear regression modeling showed that strongest predictor performance, while CA influenced when no present. When present, amount highly specific becomes main performance.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

The influence of relative pubertal maturity on executive function development in adolescent girls DOI Creative Commons
Patrícia Gerván, Gyöngyi Oláh, Katinka Utczás

et al.

Scientific Reports, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 14(1)

Published: Nov. 15, 2024

A positive association between pubertal maturity as assessed by skeletal development, and specific cognitive abilities has recently been demonstrated in a cohort of adolescent girls. The current study explores the impact chronological age relative on executive function within same cohort. Relative maturity, determined difference age, establishes criteria for enrolling participants into average, advanced, or delayed subgroups. Performance is using Numerical Stroop test analyzed across four conditions, each with varying task requirements related to inhibition switching. effects functions are tested linear mixed model. Within examined age-range (12–15 y), more protracted development was found compared In line previous findings, results reveal significant performance also effect executing functioning. interaction Chronological Age Maturity suggests that degree interplay these factors varies range. Specifically, may have noticeable EF functioning middle adolescence early adolescence.

Language: Английский

Citations

0