American Journal of Industrial Medicine,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
65(9), P. 721 - 730
Published: July 5, 2022
The
potential
for
work
to
be
a
risk
factor
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
was
recognized
early
in
the
pandemic
based
on
likelihood
of
work-related
differences
exposures
COVID-19
different
occupations.
Due
intense
demands
pandemic,
implementation
recommendations
collect
information
occupation
relation
has
been
uneven
across
United
States.
objective
this
study
investigate
test
positivity
by
occupation.We
analyzed
data
collected
from
September
8
November
30,
2020,
Delphi
Group
at
Carnegie
Mellon
University
US
Trends
and
Impact
Survey,
offered
daily
random
sample
US-based
Facebook
users
aged
18
years
or
older,
who
were
invited
via
banner
their
news
feed.
Our
focus
ever
testing
positive
respondents
working
outside
home
pay
past
4
weeks.The
major
occupational
groups
"Production",
"Building
grounds
cleaning
maintenance,"
"Construction
extraction,"
"Healthcare
support,"
"Food
preparation
serving"
had
five
highest
percentages
(16.7%-14.4%).
Highest
detailed
categories
(28.6%-19.1%)
"Massage
therapist,"
processing
worker,"
"Bailiff,
correctional
officer,
jailer,"
"Funeral
service
"First-line
supervisor
production
operating
workers,"
"Nursing
assistant
psychiatric
aide."
Differences
remained
after
adjustment
age,
gender,
pre-existing
medical
conditions.Information
can
aid
targeting
messaging
vaccination
mitigation
strategies
current
future
respiratory
infection
epidemics
pandemics.
These
results,
obtained
before
availability
vaccines,
form
basis
comparison
evaluate
impacts
subsequent
emergence
viral
variants.
Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
76(5), P. 440 - 447
Published: Jan. 7, 2022
Background
Research
on
occupation
and
risk
of
COVID-19
among
foreign-born
workers
is
lacking.
We
investigated
whether
working
in
essential
occupations
was
associated
with
diagnosis,
hospitalisation
intensive
care
unit
(ICU)
admission
similar
as
Swedish-born
individuals
had
a
higher
the
studied
outcomes.
Methods
Occupational
data
(2018–2019)
326
052
employees
(20–65
years)
who
were
resident
Sweden
1
January
2020
linked
to
registered
from
28
February
2021.
analysed
outcomes
different
occupational
groups
four
immigrant/occupation
intersectional
using
Cox
proportional
hazards
regression
adjustments
for
sociodemographic
socioeconomic
characteristics
pre-existing
comorbidities.
Results
identified
29797,
1069
152
cases
hospitalisations
ICU
admissions,
respectively,
our
cohort.
Workers
an
elevated
hospitalisation,
admissions.
Healthcare
all
compared
other
workers.
Relative
non-essential
occupations,
1.85
(95%
CI
1.78
1.93),
3.80
3.17
4.55)
3.79
2.33
6.14)
times
admission,
respectively.
The
corresponding
risks
1.44
1.40
1.49),
1.30
1.08
1.56)
1.46
0.90
2.38).
Conclusion
Occupation
contributed
burden
this
study.
Occupational and Environmental Medicine,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
80(10), P. 545 - 552
Published: Sept. 28, 2023
Objectives
To
establish
whether
prevalence
and
severity
of
long-COVID
symptoms
vary
by
industry
occupation.
Methods
We
used
Office
for
National
Statistics
COVID-19
Infection
Survey
(CIS)
data
(February
2021–April
2022)
working-age
participants
(16–65
years).
Exposures
were
industry,
occupation
major
Standard
Occupational
Classification
(SOC)
group.
Outcomes
self-reported:
(1)
(2)
reduced
function
due
to
long-COVID.
Binary
(outcome
1)
ordered
2)
logistic
regression
estimate
odds
ratios
(OR)and
(marginal
means).
Results
Public
facing
industries,
including
teaching
education,
social
care,
healthcare,
civil
service,
retail
transport
industries
occupations,
had
the
highest
likelihood
By
SOC
group,
those
in
caring,
leisure
other
services
(OR
1.44,
95%
CIs
1.38
1.52)
substantially
elevated
than
average.
For
almost
all
exposures,
pattern
ORs
followed
SARS-CoV-2
infections,
except
professional
occupations
(eg,
some
scientific
occupations)
(infection:
OR<1
;
long-COVID:
OR>1).
The
probability
reporting
ranged
from
7.7%
(financial
services)
11.6%
(teaching
education);
whereas
‘a
lot’
17.1%
(arts,
entertainment
recreation)
22%–23%
education
armed
forces)
27%
(not
working).
Conclusions
risk
differs
across
occupations.
Generally,
it
appears
that
developing
follows
infection,
These
findings
highlight
sectors
where
further
research
is
needed
understand
occupational
factors
resulting
American Journal of Industrial Medicine,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
66(3), P. 233 - 242
Published: Jan. 24, 2023
Abstract
Background
Higher
incidences
of
COVID‐19
mortality
and
outbreaks
have
been
found
in
certain
industries
occupations.
Workplace
factors,
including
working
close
proximity
to
others
contact
with
the
public
can
facilitate
SARS‐CoV‐2
transmission,
especially
without
appropriate
protective
measures.
Limited
information
is
available
about
workers
at
highest
risk
for
infection.
Methods
A
phone‐based,
nonprobability
study
was
conducted
between
November
2020
May
2021
among
California
who
were
tested
SARS‐CoV‐2.
Participants
asked
demographics
workplace
industry,
occupation,
implementation
mitigation
Using
occupational
exposure
matrix,
three
metrics
a
combination
index
used
categorize
We
assessed
association
risks
test
positivity
using
adjusted
logistic
regression.
Results
enrolled
451
(13%)
3475
potentially
eligible
study:
212
positive
239
negative
results.
Those
very
combined
had
positivity.
Primarily
indoor
lower
odds
compared
those
any
outdoor
work.
There
no
public‐facing
occupations
employers
implemented
measures
all
control
categories—engineering,
administrative,
personal
equipment—had
than
fewer
Conclusions
Worker
groups
higher
factors
should
be
prioritized
outreach.
Assessment
collectively
provide
insight
inform
preventative
actions
workers,
employers,
health
entities.
PLOS Global Public Health,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
5(4), P. e0004420 - e0004420
Published: April 8, 2025
This
study
explores
the
linkage
between
acute
SARS-CoV-2
and
car
crashes
across
U.S.
states,
correlating
with
COVID-19
mitigation
strategies,
vaccination
rates,
Long
COVID
prevalence.
investigation
analyzed
aggregate
crash
data
spanning
2020–2023,
collection
occurring
March
May
2024.
Analysis
was
done
via
a
Poisson
regression
model,
adjusted
for
population.
Key
variables
included
status,
month-specific
effects
relating
to
initial
pandemic
shutdowns,
rates.
Results
demonstrated
significant
association
infections
an
increase
in
crashes,
independent
of
status
tune
OR
1.25
[1.23-1.26].
observed
despite
varying
efforts
rates
states.
The
found
no
protective
effect
against
challenging
prior
assumptions
about
benefits
vaccination.
Notably,
risk
associated
be
analogous
driving
impairments
seen
alcohol
consumption
at
legal
limits.
Findings
suggest
implications
public
health
policies,
especially
assessing
readiness
individuals
recovering
from
engage
high-risk
activities
such
as
pilots
or
nuclear
plant
employees.
Further
research
is
necessary
establish
causation
explore
exact
within
CNS
affecting
cognition
behavior.
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
20(1)
Published: May 22, 2025
Abstract
Background
During
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
several
industries
were
deemed
essential.
However,
information
on
infection
risk
in
occupational
settings
outside
of
healthcare
workers
and
medical
staff
(HCWs)
remain
scarce.
Thus,
a
systematic
review
with
meta-analysis
was
conducted
to
compile
SARS-CoV-2
non-healthcare
(non-HCWs).
Methods
We
screened
three
databases
(EMBASE,
PubMed,
medRχiv)
for
studies
working
population.
Several
stages
severity
(infection,
hospitalisation,
admission
intensive
care
unit
(ICU),
mortality)
eligible.
Occupational
specifications
harmonised
according
German
classification
professions
(KldB).
All
reported
estimators
considered.
Studies
analysed
their
bias.
Results
random-effects
meta-analyses
assessed
evidence
GRADE.
Subgroup
analyses
run
‘outcome’,
‘comparison
group’,
‘risk
bias’.
Of
9,081
publications
identified,
25
recognised
as
eligible,
mainly
describing
first
year
pandemic.
For
20
occupations,
we
able
carry
out
KldB-4-level
by
integrating
all
severity.
Nine
occupations
identified
statistically
significantly
increased
SARS-CoV-2,
four
which
had
relative
(RR)
>
2:
Occupations
meat
processing
(RR
=
3.58
[95%-CI
1.46;
8.77]),
building
cleaning
services
2.55
1.51;
4.31]),
cargo
handling
2.52
2.27;
2.79])
cooks
2.53
1.75;
3.67]).
The
certainty
eight
results
found
moderate
or
high.
Conclusions
other
than
HCWs
revealed
considerably
elevated
individual
related
well
commercial
services.
Trial
registration
PROSPERO
CRD42021297572.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
19(4), P. 2429 - 2429
Published: Feb. 19, 2022
Health
workers
(HW)
are
at
increased
risk
for
SARS-CoV-2
infection.
In
order
to
monitor
the
infection
dynamic
on
basis
of
contact
with
patients,
HW
St.
Antonius
Hospital
(SAH)
were
tested
four
times
in
one
year
by
PCR
and
serology.
The
cumulative
incidence
was
calculated.
Swab
blood
tests
simultaneously
performed
between
April
2020
2021.
Risk
factors
demographic
information
assessed
beginning
study.
response
rate
above
75%
all
rounds
testing.
study
comprised
1506
HW,
165
(10.6%)
which
positive
Working
an
ICU
or
wards
patient
(OR
4.4,
95%
CI
1.73–13.6
OR
2.9,
1.27–8.49).
At
end
study,
majority
(810
1363
(59.4%))
had
been
vaccinated
least
once.
A
total
29.1%
unvaccinated
5.3%
showed
immune
typical
natural
Of
73
who
provided
course
disease,
31.5%
reported
that
their
quality
life
continued
be
impaired.
low
these
may
attributed
vaccination
good
hygiene.
Nevertheless,
a
work-related
identified,
highlighting
need
improve
protection
against
high
developing
long
COVID
found
after
has
subsided.
Special
rehabilitation
programs
should
compensated
reduced
work
capacity
case
fails
takes
time.
Clinical Infectious Diseases,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
76(7), P. 1285 - 1294
Published: Nov. 10, 2022
Abstract
Background
There
are
limited
data
on
the
risk
of
severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
coronavirus
2
(SARS-CoV-2)
infection
in
United
States
by
occupation.
We
identified
occupations
at
higher
for
prior
SARS-CoV-2
as
defined
presence
infection-induced
antibodies
among
US
blood
donors.
Methods
Using
a
nested
case-control
study
design,
donors
during
May–December
2021
with
anti-nucleocapsid
(anti-N)
testing
were
sent
an
electronic
survey
employment
status,
vaccination,
and
The
association
between
previous
occupation-specific
in-person
work
was
estimated
using
multivariable
logistic
regression
adjusting
sex,
age,
month
donation,
race
ethnicity,
education,
telework.
Results
Among
85
986
included
respondents,
9504
(11.1%)
anti-N
reactive.
Healthcare
support
(20.3%),
protective
service
(19.9%),
food
preparation
serving
related
(19.7%)
had
highest
proportion
infection.
After
adjustment,
associated
healthcare
practitioners
(adjusted
odds
ratio
[aOR],
2.10;
95%
confidence
interval
[CI],
1.74–2.54)
(aOR,
1.82;
CI,
1.39–2.40)
compared
computer
mathematical
referent
group.
Lack
disease
2019
vaccination
16.13;
15.01–17.34)
never
teleworking
1.17;
1.05–1.30)
also
independently
Construction
extraction
unvaccinated
workers
(30.5%).
Conclusions
Workers
healthcare,
services,
prevalence
Occupational
risks
remained
after
telework,
demographic
factors.
These
findings
underscore
need
mitigation
measures
personal
protection
settings
other
workplaces.