Scientific Reports,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(1)
Published: Dec. 30, 2024
Cognitive
decline
is
an
important
feature
of
aging
population.
Despite
the
large
body
research
investigating
effects
high-intensity
interval
training
(HIIT)
on
cognitive
performance,
reports
its
effectiveness
are
inconsistent
and
it
difficult
to
determine
what
factors
moderate
these
effects.
The
purpose
this
study
was
conduct
a
meta-analysis
existing
randomised
controlled
trials
HIIT
various
domains
further
examine
intervention
cycle
age-related
moderating
A
comprehensive
literature
search
conducted
across
range
databases,
including
PubMed,
Embase,
Cochrane
Library,
Web
Science,
Scopus,
EBSCO.
included
data
from
20
RCT
studies.
results
analyses
demonstrated
that
significantly
enhanced
information
processing
(SMD
=
0.33,
95%
CI:
0.15-0.52,
P
0.0005),
executive
function
0.38,
0.26
-
0.50,
<
0.00001),
memory
0.21,
0.07-0.35,
0.004).
Subgroup
in
individuals
aged
60
above,
improved
functioning
all
ages,
30
60.
Acute
function,
less
than
8
weeks
memory,
more
processing,
memory.
findings
indicate
has
beneficial
effect
performance.
Chronic
represents
potential
non-pharmacological
for
health.
Further
high-quality
required
validate
extend
findings.
Critical Care Explorations,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
7(4), P. e1233 - e1233
Published: March 24, 2025
A
large
multicenter
retrospective
study
was
conducted
to
examine
practice
patterns
in
the
care
of
severe
acute
asthma
PICUs
compared
with
adult
ICUs.
Eligible
patients
were
12-26
y
old,
admitted
a
PICU
or
an
ICU
asthma,
and
received
noninvasive
ventilation
mechanical
ventilation.
Multiple
medication
prescribing
examined.
3,361
total
included:
583
(17.3%)
2,778
(82.7%)
Significantly
more
parenteral
terbutaline
(25.7%
vs.
10.2%,
standard
mean
differences
=
0.412)
than
those
Admission
for
associated
trend
toward
increased
mortality,
cardiac
arrhythmias
duration
Further
studies
are
needed
assess
safety
efficacy
adolescents
young
adults;
guidelines
management
needed.
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
22(1)
Published: April 24, 2025
Stroke
is
a
leading
cause
of
disability
worldwide,
significantly
impairing
upper
limb
(UL)
function
and
reducing
patients'
ability
to
perform
activities
daily
living
(ADL)
quality
life
(QoL).
Virtual
reality
(VR)
has
emerged
as
promising
tool
for
UL
rehabilitation,
offering
immersive
engaging
environments
motor
recovery.
However,
the
effectiveness
VR,
its
integration
with
conventional
therapy,
their
efficacy
across
different
stroke
recovery
stages
remain
unclear.
Therefore,
this
systematic
review
meta-analysis
aimed
evaluate
VR-based
interventions
in
improving
ADL
QoL
among
survivors.
This
study
adhered
PRISMA
guidelines
was
registered
on
PROSPERO
(CRD42023426256).
A
search
PubMed,
Scopus,
Web
Science
identified
randomized
controlled
trials
(RCTs)
published
English.
Inclusion
criteria
focused
studies
using
VR
(IVR)
non-immersive
(NIVR)
assess
Data
extraction
assessment
were
performed
independently
by
two
reviewers
PEDro
scale
quality.
Meta-analyses
conducted
determine
efficacy.
Subgroup
analyses
compare
IVR
NIVR,
combined
therapy
versus
standalone
potential
differences
between
stages.
Thirty
RCTs,
representing
1,661
participants,
included.
Overall,
improved
(SMD
=
0.27,
95%
CI
[0.11;
0.43],
p
<
0.001)
0.94
[0.09;
1.79],
0.035)
compared
therapy.
demonstrated
superior
outcomes
NIVR
0.54
[0.13;
0.95]
Vs.
0.17
[0.02;
0.36],
0.03).
Subacute
survivors
exhibited
most
significant
gains
0.52
[0.16;
0.88],
0.004),
chronic
0.05
[-0.36;
0.46])
or
acute
patients
0.08
[-0.11;
0.27]).
interventions,
particularly
enhance
moderate
certainty
evidence.
These
findings
underscore
value
especially
during
subacute
phase,
but
highlight
need
further
research
into
long-term
effects
implementation
low-resource
settings.
BMJ Open Quality,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
14(2), P. e003209 - e003209
Published: April 1, 2025
Objective
The
objective
of
this
systematic
review
and
meta-analysis
(SRMA)
was
to
evaluate
the
impact
electronic
patient-reported
outcomes
(ePROs)
on
health-related
quality
life
(HRQoL)
in
patients
with
cancer.
Design
We
performed
SRMA
randomised
controlled
trials
(RCTs)
comparing
ePRO
interventions
usual
care
primary
outcome
HRQoL.
used
a
random
effects
model
priori
due
anticipated
clinical
heterogeneity.
Subgroup
analyses
meta-regressions
were
explore
sources
After
assessing
risk
bias
using
risk-of-bias
tool
(RoB
V.2),
we
rated
evidence
certainty
Grading
Recommendations,
Assessment,
Development
Evaluations
framework.
Eligibility
criteria
included
studies
meeting
following
criteria:
(1)
RCTs;
(2)
diagnosed
any
type
cancer,
undergoing
or
having
completed
treatment;
(3)
ePROs
without
interventions;
(4)
effect
Information
systematically
searched
PubMed,
Embase,
Cochrane
Central
Register
Controlled
Trials
up
April
2024.
Results
screened
7706
records
include
36
RCTs
9608
patients.
showed
standardised
mean
difference
(SMD)
0.35;
95%
CI
0.18
0.51
compared
care.
Patients
receiving
ongoing
therapy
had
an
SMD
0.39
(95%
0.21
0.58),
while
those
who
0.12
0.01
0.22),
significant
subgroup
(p=0.01).
No
statistically
differences
observed
across
method
assessment,
cancer
site,
metastasis
status,
average
age
duration
use.
results
remained
consistent
Bayesian
other
sensitivity
analyses.
Conclusions
improve
HRQoL
more
than
greater
currently
therapy.
This
improvement
is
independent
type,
use
patient
age.
Future
research
should
address
heterogeneity,
long-term
impacts
develop
strategies
increase
engagement
adherence
systems.
PROSPERO
registration
number
CRD42024531708.
Anesthesiology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
142(1), P. 244 - 246
Published: Nov. 13, 2024
I
write
to
offer
a
comment
and
suggestion
on
the
systematic
review
meta-analysis
by
Hussain
et
al.
of
local
anesthetics
used
for
fascial
plane
block.1
This
report
compared
analgesia
between
liposomal
bupivacaine
plain
bupivacaine,
primary
outcome
being
rest
pain
scores
over
24-to-72
h
postoperative
interval
expressed
as
an
area
under
curve.1
Using
data
from
874
patients
in
13
studies
adopting
Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Johnkman
random-effects
model
with
severity
difference
treatments
transformed
standardized
mean
difference,
authors
abstract
body
that
"No
was
observed
two
groups
curve
scores,
(95%
CI)
–0.21
cm.h
(–0.43
0.01;
P
=
0.058;
I2
48%)."
The
excellent
statistical
methods
software
within
frequentist
methodology;
inferences
were
made
null
hypothesis
significance
testing.
As
emphasized
statisticians
epidemiologists,2
observing
value
>
0.05
does
not
demonstrate
no
effect
or
absence
demonstrated.
Neither
is
probability
hypothesis.2
Nor
95%
CI
have
including
true
size.2
A
correct
more
cautious
description
result
0.058
this
would
be
rejected.Statistical
approaches
using
Bayesian
theory,
can
provide
alternative
doing
meta-analysis.
parameters
μ
(true
population
difference)
τ2
(variance
studies).
study
values
displayed
article's
figure
3,1
ran
comparing
anesthetic
32,000
iterations
four
chains
Markov
chain
Monte
Carlo
algorithm
R
package
brms
(2.21.6).3
prior
distributions
Normal(0,
1)
HalfCauchy(0,
0.5)
τ
guidance
choosing
"weakly
informative"
meta-analysis.4
All
sampling
convergence
characteristics
fitted
(Gelman-Rubin
statistic
1.00,
large
effective
sample
size,
small
standard
error,
etc.)
satisfactory.
Sensitivity
analyses
other
priors
both
gave
very
similar,
almost
identical
estimated
credible
intervals.
fit
normal
half
Cauchy
subjected
power
scaling
priorsense
(1.0.1)
package;
there
sensitivity
either
strengthening
weakening
distribution.5
Estimated
parameter
reported
means,
deviations
intervals.The
(standardized
–0.21,
(–0.21)
al.1
However,
intervals
(–0.43,
–0.01)
longer
crossed
zero
line
effect.
With
98%
probability,
reduction
larger
than
bupivacaine.
Also,
variability
(τ2)
0.06
(0.01,
0.26).The
also
known
Hedges'
g.
It
unitless,
dimensionless
metric.
Heuristics
interpreting
absolute
magnitude
has
been
offered
0.2,
0.50,
0.8
proposed
showing
small,
medium,
effects.6
models,
summary
about
–0.20;
clinically
unimportant
model,
medium
sized
–0.5
better
only
1%.Bayesian
(1)
allows
direct
modeling
uncertainty
differences
(τ2);
(2)
produces
full
posterior
distribution
variance
(μ,
τ2)
(fig.
1);
(3)
permits
estimation
containing
values;
(4)
testing
interesting
values.7
models
inferences,
Bayesian,
are
subject
validity
assumptions.
use
some
additional
tools
meta-analysis.The
author
declares
competing
interests.
Systematic Reviews,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
13(1)
Published: July 30, 2024
Abstract
Background
External
cephalic
version
(ECV)
is
a
medical
procedure
in
which
an
extracorporeal
manipulation
performed
to
render
the
breech
presentation
(BP)
fetus
position.
The
use
of
anesthesia
facilitate
repositioning
has
been
evaluated
various
randomized
clinical
trials
(RCTs),
but
its
potential
effectiveness
remains
controversial.
Methods
A
systematic
literature
search
was
carried
out
8
electronic
databases.
In
meta-analysis,
random
effects
model
used
calculate
pooled
relative
risk
(RR)
and
95%
confidence
interval
(CI),
standardized
mean
difference
(SMD)
CI,
order
systematically
assess
effect
on
success
rates
ECV,
vaginal
delivery,
cesarean
delivery
as
well
other
outcomes.
Relevant
subgroup
analyses,
publication
bias
test
sensitivity
analyses
were
also
conducted.
Results
This
review
included
17
RCTs.
Women
who
received
had
significantly
higher
incidence
successful
ECV
(RR:
1.37,
CIs:
1.19-1.58)
1.23,
1.03-1.47),
lower
0.69,
0.53-0.91),
compared
with
those
did
not.
Conclusion
administration
not
only
reduces
maternal
pain
increases
rate
women
malpresentation
at
term,
leading
significant
rise
delivery.
However,
it
may
increase
hypotension.
Systematic
registration
protocol
prospectively
registered
PROSPERO,
CRD42022381552.
Endodontology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Sept. 26, 2024
ABSTRACT
With
the
rapid
growth
in
research,
clinicians
are
witnessing
a
huge
number
of
transformations
treatment
techniques,
materials,
devices,
and
technology
for
management
dental
problems.
However,
biggest
challenge
is
to
determine
which
among
new
products
or
methods
truly
reliable
beneficial
patients.
Consulting
an
expert
reading
any
random
article
will
not
significantly
solve
this
problem.
We
require
more
systematic
robust
approach
address
The
review
meta-analysis
comprehensive
research
that
evaluate
multiple
articles
both
qualitatively
quantitatively.
quantitative
component
review,
mathematically
combines
results
provides
estimates
with
greater
power
precision.
As
clinician,
it
essential
understand
basics
greatly
reduce
problem
practicing
evidence-based
dentistry.
This
discusses
special
focus
on
summary
measures,
forest
plots,
heterogeneity.