Taming the terminological tempest in invasion science
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
99(4), P. 1357 - 1390
Published: March 18, 2024
ABSTRACT
Standardised
terminology
in
science
is
important
for
clarity
of
interpretation
and
communication.
In
invasion
–
a
dynamic
rapidly
evolving
discipline
the
proliferation
technical
has
lacked
standardised
framework
its
development.
The
result
convoluted
inconsistent
usage
terminology,
with
various
discrepancies
descriptions
damage
interventions.
A
therefore
needed
clear,
universally
applicable,
consistent
to
promote
more
effective
communication
across
researchers,
stakeholders,
policymakers.
Inconsistencies
stem
from
exponential
increase
scientific
publications
on
patterns
processes
biological
invasions
authored
by
experts
disciplines
countries
since
1990s,
as
well
legislators
policymakers
focusing
practical
applications,
regulations,
management
resources.
Aligning
standardising
stakeholders
remains
challenge
science.
Here,
we
review
evaluate
multiple
terms
used
(e.g.
‘non‐native’,
‘alien’,
‘invasive’
or
‘invader’,
‘exotic’,
‘non‐indigenous’,
‘naturalised’,
‘pest’)
propose
simplified
terminology.
streamlined
translate
into
28
other
languages
based
(
i
)
denoting
species
transported
beyond
their
natural
biogeographic
range,
ii
‘established
non‐native’,
i.e.
those
non‐native
that
have
established
self‐sustaining
populations
new
location(s)
wild,
iii
‘invasive
non‐native’
recently
spread
are
spreading
invaded
range
actively
passively
without
human
mediation.
We
also
highlight
importance
conceptualising
‘spread’
classifying
invasiveness
‘impact’
management.
Finally,
protocol
dispersal
mechanism,
origin,
population
status,
iv
impact.
Collectively
introducing
present
aims
facilitate
collaboration
species.
Language: Английский
Spatial Scale and the Underestimation of Stream Fish Community Invadedness
Global Ecology and Biogeography,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
34(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
ABSTRACT
Scale‐Dependency
of
Native
Status
Classifying
populations
as
native
or
nonnative
requires
well‐defined
range
boundaries
for
species.
While
many
studies
define
status
according
to
large
biogeographic
realms,
natural
dispersal
barriers
often
limit
species
distributions
at
regional
smaller
spatial
extents.
As
such,
native/nonnative
definitions
are
inherently
scale‐dependent
and
estimates
community
invadedness
thus
depend
on
the
resolution
which
is
defined.
For
example,
can
be
introduced
among
regions
within
ecological
provinces
(hereafter,
simply
“provinces”).
By
explicitly
considering
scale‐dependency
definitions,
we
more
effectively
compare
results
across
studies,
comprehensively
evaluate
degree
invasion
levels,
objectively
communicate
a
Location
30,034
stream
segments,
conterminous
United
States.
Time
Period
2000–2023.
Major
Taxa
Studied
Freshwater
fishes.
Quantifying
Fish
Community
Invadedness
Across
US
Streams
We
illustrate
importance
by
quantifying
richness
relative
abundance
in
fish
communities
States,
finding
that
provincially
nearly
four
times
prevalent
extra‐realm
species,
represented
approximately
10%
all
individuals
average
surveys.
Implications
Unrealistically
broad
underestimate
invadedness.
Dismissing
regionally
have
severe
consequences,
including
displacement
hybridisation
with
loss
unique
through
biotic
homogenisation.
These
consequences
may
undermine
efforts
maintain
protect
distinct
local
biodiversity
conserve
endemic
Language: Английский
Taming the terminological tempest in invasion science
Published: Sept. 6, 2023
Standardized
terminology
in
science
is
important
for
clarity
of
interpretation
and
communication.
In
invasion
—
a
dynamic
quickly
evolving
discipline
the
rapid
proliferation
technical
has
lacked
standardized
framework
its
language
development.
The
result
convoluted
inconsistent
usage
terminology,
with
various
discrepancies
descriptions
damages
interventions.
A
therefore
needed
clear,
universally
applicable,
consistent
to
promote
more
effective
communication
across
researchers,
stakeholders,
policymakers.
Inconsistencies
stem
from
exponential
increase
scientific
publications
on
patterns
processes
biological
invasions
authored
by
experts
disciplines
countries
since
1990s,
as
well
legislators
policymakers
focusing
practical
applications,
regulations,
management
resources.
Aligning
standardizing
stakeholders
remains
prevailing
challenge
science.
Here,
we
review
evaluate
multiple
terms
used
(e.g.
'non-native',
'alien',
'invasive'
or
'invader',
'exotic',
'non-indigenous',
'naturalized,
'pest')
propose
simplified
terminology.
streamlined
translate
into
28
other
languages
based
(i)
denoting
species
transported
beyond
their
natural
biogeographic
range,
(ii)
'established
non-native',
i.e.
those
non-native
that
have
established
self-sustaining
populations
new
location(s)
wild,
(iii)
'invasive
non-native'
recently
spread
are
spreading
rapidly
invaded
range
actively
passively
without
human
mediation.
We
also
highlight
importance
conceptualizing
'spread'
classifying
invasiveness
'impact'
management.
Finally,
protocol
(1)
dispersal
mechanism,
(2)
origin,
(3)
population
status,
(4)
impact.
Collectively
introducing
present
aims
facilitate
collaboration
species.
Language: Английский
Large language models overcome the challenges of unstructured text data in ecology
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 26, 2024
Abstract
The
vast
volume
of
currently
available
unstructured
text
data,
such
as
research
papers,
news,
and
technical
report
shows
great
potential
for
ecological
research.
However,
manual
processing
data
is
labour-intensive,
posing
a
significant
challenge.
In
this
study,
we
aimed
to
assess
the
application
three
state-of-the-art
prompt-based
large
language
models
(LLMs),
GPT
3.5,
4,
LLaMA-2-70B,
automate
identification,
interpretation,
extraction,
structuring
relevant
information
from
textual
sources.
We
focused
on
species
distribution
two
sources:
news
outlets
papers.
assessed
LLMs
four
key
tasks:
classification
documents
with
identification
regions
where
are
recorded,
generation
geographical
coordinates
these
regions,
supply
results
in
structured
format.
4
consistently
outperformed
other
models,
demonstrating
high
capacity
interpret
extract
information,
percentage
correct
outputs
often
exceeding
90%
(average
accuracy
across
87–100%).
Its
performance
also
depended
source
type
task,
better
achieved
reports,
reports
presentation
output.
predecessor,
exhibited
reasonably
low
all
tasks
sources
81–97%),
whereas
LLaMA-2-70B
showed
worst
(37–
73%).
These
demonstrate
benefit
integrating
into
assimilation
workflows
essential
tools
efficiently
process
volumes
data.
Language: Английский
Who Reports and What about Invasive Plant Species? Results of the First National Questionnaire-Based Survey
Stepan Senator,
No information about this author
Yu. K. Vinogradova,
No information about this author
E. O. Gorbunova
No information about this author
et al.
Russian Journal of Biological Invasions,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
16(1), P. 118 - 132
Published: March 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Who is reporting non‐native species and how? A cross‐expert assessment of practices and drivers of non‐native biodiversity reporting in species regional listing
Ecology and Evolution,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
13(5)
Published: May 1, 2023
Abstract
Each
year,
hundreds
of
scientific
works
with
species'
geographical
data
are
published.
However,
these
can
be
challenging
to
identify,
collect,
and
integrate
into
analytical
workflows
due
differences
in
reporting
structures,
storage
formats,
the
omission
or
inconsistency
relevant
information
terminology.
These
difficulties
tend
aggravated
for
non‐native
species,
given
varying
attitudes
toward
species
existence
an
additional
layer
invasion‐related
Thus,
our
objective
is
identify
current
practices
drivers
literature.
We
conducted
online
survey
targeting
authors
regional
checklists—a
widely
published
source
biogeographical
data—where
we
asked
about
habits
perceptions
regarding
taxa.
The
responses
relationships
between
response
variables
predictors
were
analyzed
using
descriptive
statistics
ordinal
logistic
regression
models.
With
a
rate
22.4%
(
n
=
113),
found
that
nearly
half
respondents
(45.5%)
do
not
always
report
taxa,
those
who
report,
many
(44.7%)
differentiate
them
from
native
Close
(46.4%)
also
view
terminology
biological
invasions
as
obstacle
ways
which
checklist
provided
varied,
but
mainly
correspond
text
embedded
tables
(when
given)
mentioned
alongside
species.
Only
13.4%
mention
provide
automation‐friendly
formats
its
publication
biodiversity
repositories.
Data
on
distribution
essential
monitoring
global
change
preventing
invasions.
Despite
importance
results
show
urgent
need
improve
frequency,
accessibility,
consistency
data.
Language: Английский
Large language models overcome the challenges of unstructured text data in ecology
Ecological Informatics,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
82, P. 102742 - 102742
Published: Aug. 2, 2024
The
vast
volume
of
currently
available
unstructured
text
data,
such
as
research
papers,
news,
and
technical
report
shows
great
potential
for
ecological
research.
However,
manual
processing
data
is
labour-intensive,
posing
a
significant
challenge.
In
this
study,
we
aimed
to
assess
the
application
three
state-of-the-art
prompt-based
large
language
models
(LLMs),
GPT-3.5,
GPT-4,
LLaMA-2-70B,
automate
identification,
interpretation,
extraction,
structuring
relevant
information
from
textual
sources.
We
focused
on
species
distribution
two
sources:
news
outlets
papers.
assessed
LLMs
four
key
tasks:
classification
documents
with
identification
regions
where
are
recorded,
generation
geographical
coordinates
these
regions,
supply
results
in
structured
format.
GPT-4
consistently
outperformed
other
models,
demonstrating
high
capacity
interpret
extract
information,
percentage
correct
outputs
often
exceeding
90%
(average
accuracy
across
87–100%).
Its
performance
also
depended
source
type
task,
better
achieved
reports,
reports
presentation
output.
predecessor,
exhibited
slightly
lower
all
tasks
sources
81–97%),
whereas
LLaMA-2-70B
showed
worst
(37–73%).
These
demonstrate
benefit
integrating
into
assimilation
workflows
essential
tools
efficiently
process
volumes
data.
Language: Английский
D5.5 Short-term ecological forecasts in support of the Bioeconomy Strategy and EU citizens
Published: Jan. 19, 2024
A
relevant
number
of
ecological
questions
raised
by
policymakers,
managers,
and
citizens
often
pertain
to
the
short-term
future
(e.g.,
coming
days
or
weeks).
In
this
sense,
biological
forecasts
can
make
substantial
practical
contributions
achieving
policy
objectives
benefit
society
broadly.
Specifically,
Essential
Biodiversity
Variables
(EBVs)
Ecosystem
Service
(EESVs)
support
decision-making
stakeholders
from
multiple
sectors,
enabling
anticipate
transformations
proactive,
informed
decisions
that
promote
conservation,
economic
activities,
human
well-being.
The
aim
task
was
demonstrate
how
a
European
Observation
Network
generation
spatial
phenomena
Bioeconomy
Strategy
EU
at
large.
Our
specific
included
showcasing
1)
computational
workflow
enables
production
days-ahead
for
distinct
2)
specialized
bird
aerial
biomass.
first,
(‘generic’)
workflow,
is
exemplified
using
two
case
studies:
i)
forecasting
fruiting
wild
mushroom
commercial
recreational
relevance,
ii)
life
stage
relevance
surveillance
an
invasive
pest
species
important
agriculture.
These
studies
specific,
tangible
towards
sustainable
use
bio-based
economy
ecosystem
protection,
anticipation
risks.
Beyond
aligning
with
Strategy,
our
three
targets
also
offer
wider
range
strategies
policies.
We
actively
involved
in
defining
end-products
development
modelling
approaches
workflows.
This
process
entailed
approaches.
For
generic
we
engaged
participatory
project's
start,
focusing
on
foraging
experts
mycology
modelling.
biomass
built
upon
developments
predated
project,
engagement
primarily
drawing
insights
input
earlier
initiatives.
workflows
serve
complementary
purposes
terms
primary
data
they
use.
While
first
(generic)
based
growing
body
opportunistic
biodiversity
observation
data,
particularly
citizen
science
initiatives,
second
requires
highly
radar
weather
stations.
However,
both
predictor
observations
employ
machine
learning
algorithms
correlate
these
observed
variations
being
forecasted.
Language: Английский
Non-native herpetofauna of Aruba island (Caribbean): patterns and insights
Biological Invasions,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
26(8), P. 2421 - 2433
Published: June 26, 2024
Abstract
Islands
harbor
a
significant
proportion
of
global
biodiversity
and
also
have
disproportionately
high
richness
introduced
species
relative
to
continents.
Given
the
sensitivity
island
ecosystems
species,
data
deficiencies
on
introduction
pathways,
patterns
establishment,
potential
impacts
can
hamper
mitigation
conservation
efforts
islands.
The
Caribbean
region
is
emerging
as
hotspot
for
amphibian
reptile
(herpetofaunal)
but
associated
with
herpetofaunal
introductions
specific
islands
are
not
well
explored.
Here,
we
perform
detailed
investigation
Aruba,
small
an
exceptionally
number
species.
We
compile
database
from
literature
years,
source
locations,
native
ranges,
establishment
outcomes,
habitat
use,
ecological
three
newly
documented
12
previously
Aruba.
From
this
synthesize
emergent
Aruba
highlight
areas
deficiency.
Overall,
echo
exhibited
in
greater
region.
Introduction
rates
been
increasing
exponentially,
yet
pathways
locations
most
unknown.
Following
introduction,
successfully
establish
localized
populations
anthropogenic
habitat,
well-assessed.
suggest
increased
monitoring
shipments
will
help
identify
slow
new
further
studies
needed.
Language: Английский