Diversity and Distributions,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
24(11), P. 1657 - 1673
Published: June 12, 2018
Abstract
Aim
Accurate
predictions
of
cetacean
distributions
are
essential
to
their
conservation
but
limited
by
statistical
challenges
and
a
paucity
data.
This
study
aimed
at
comparing
the
capacity
various
algorithms
deal
with
biases
commonly
found
in
nonsystematic
surveys
evaluate
potential
for
citizen
science
data
improve
habitat
modelling
predictions.
An
endangered
population
humpback
whales
(
Megaptera
novaeangliae
)
breeding
ground
was
used
as
case
study.
Location
New
Caledonia,
Oceania.
Methods
Five
were
model
preferences
from
1,360
sightings
collected
over
14
years
research
surveys.
Three
different
background
sampling
approaches
tested
when
developing
models
625
crowdsourced
assess
methods
accounting
spatial
bias.
Model
evaluation
conducted
through
cross‐validation
prediction
an
independent
satellite
tracking
dataset.
Results
Algorithms
differed
complexity
environmental
relationships
modelled,
ecological
interpretability
transferability.
While
parameter
tuning
had
great
effect
on
performances,
GLM
s
generally
low
predictive
performance,
SVM
particularly
hard
interpret,
BRT
high
descriptive
power
showed
signs
overfitting.
MAXENT
especially
GAM
provided
valuable
trade‐off,
accurate
ecologically
intelligible.
Models
that
favoured
cool
(22–23°C)
shallow
waters
(0–100
m
deep)
coastal
well
offshore
areas.
Citizen
converged
survey
models,
specifically
Main
conclusions
Marine
megafauna
distribution
present
specific
may
be
addressed
integrative
evaluation,
testing
appropriately
tuned
algorithms.
Specifically,
controlling
overfitting
is
priority
predicting
large‐scale
perspectives.
appear
powerful
tool
describe
habitat.
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
10
Published: Aug. 4, 2022
Species
Distribution
Models
(SDMs)
are
essential
tools
for
predicting
climate
change
impact
on
species’
distributions
and
commonly
employed
as
an
informative
tool
which
to
base
management
conservation
actions.
Focusing
only
a
part
of
the
entire
distribution
species
fitting
SDMs
is
common
approach.
Yet,
geographically
restricting
their
range
can
result
in
considering
subset
ecological
niche
(i.e.,
truncation)
could
lead
biased
spatial
predictions
future
effects,
particularly
if
conditions
belong
those
parts
that
have
been
excluded
model
fitting.
The
integration
large-scale
data
encompassing
whole
with
more
regional
improve
but
comes
along
challenges
owing
broader
scale
and/or
lower
quality
usually
associated
these
data.
Here,
we
compare
obtained
from
traditional
SDM
fitted
dataset
(Switzerland)
methods
combine
European
datasets
several
bird
breeding
Switzerland.
Three
models
were
fitted:
based
thus
not
accounting
truncation,
pooling
where
two
merged
without
differences
extent
or
resolution,
downscaling
hierarchical
approach
accounts
resolution.
Results
show
leads
much
larger
predicted
changes
(either
positively
negatively)
under
than
both
methods.
also
identified
different
variables
main
drivers
compared
data-integration
models.
Differences
between
regarding
outside
existing
when
implied
extrapolation).
In
conclusion,
showed
(i)
calibrated
restricted
provide
markedly
(ii)
at
least
partly
explained
by
truncation.
This
suggests
using
accurate
nuanced
through
better
characterization
realized
niches.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
120(15)
Published: April 3, 2023
Poikilothermic
animals
comprise
most
species
on
Earth
and
are
especially
sensitive
to
changes
in
environmental
temperatures.
Species
conservation
a
changing
climate
relies
upon
predictions
of
responses
future
conditions,
yet
predicting
change
when
temperatures
exceed
the
bounds
observed
data
is
fraught
with
challenges.
We
present
physiologically
guided
abundance
(PGA)
model
that
combines
observations
conditions
laboratory-derived
physiological
response
poikilotherms
temperature
predict
geographical
distributions
change.
The
incorporates
uncertainty
thermal
curves
provides
estimates
habitat
suitability
extinction
probability
based
site-specific
conditions.
show
temperature-driven
distributions,
local
extinction,
cold,
cool,
warm-adapted
vary
substantially
information
incorporated.
Notably,
cold-adapted
were
predicted
by
PGA
be
extirpated
61%
locations
they
currently
inhabit,
while
extirpation
was
never
correlative
niche
model.
Failure
account
for
species-specific
constraints
could
lead
unrealistic
under
warming
climate,
including
underestimates
near
edges
their
space
overoptimistic
species.
Journal of Animal Ecology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
92(12), P. 2248 - 2262
Published: Oct. 25, 2023
Abstract
Data
deficiencies
among
rare
or
cryptic
species
preclude
assessment
of
community‐level
processes
using
many
existing
approaches,
limiting
our
understanding
the
trends
and
stressors
for
large
numbers
species.
Yet
evaluating
dynamics
whole
communities,
not
just
common
charismatic
species,
is
critical
to
responses
biodiversity
ongoing
environmental
pressures.
A
recent
surge
in
both
public
science
government‐funded
data
collection
efforts
has
led
a
wealth
data.
However,
these
programmes
use
wide
range
sampling
protocols
(from
unstructured,
opportunistic
observations
wildlife
well‐structured,
design‐based
programmes)
record
information
at
variety
spatiotemporal
scales.
As
result,
available
vary
substantially
quantity
content,
which
must
be
carefully
reconciled
meaningful
ecological
analysis.
Hierarchical
modelling,
including
single‐species
integrated
models
hierarchical
community
models,
improved
ability
assess
predict
processes.
Here,
we
highlight
emerging
‘integrated
modelling’
framework
that
combines
integration
modelling
improve
inferences
on
species‐
dynamics.
We
illustrate
with
series
worked
examples.
Our
three
case
studies
demonstrate
how
can
used
extend
geographic
scope
when
distributions
richness
patterns;
discern
population
over
time;
estimate
demographic
rates
growth
communities
sympatric
implemented
examples
multiple
software
methods
through
R
platform
via
packages
formula‐based
interfaces
development
custom
code
JAGS,
NIMBLE
Stan.
Integrated
provide
an
exciting
approach
model
biological
observational
types
sources
simultaneously,
thus
accounting
uncertainty
error
within
unified
framework.
By
leveraging
combined
benefits
produce
valuable
about
as
well
dynamics,
allowing
holistic
evaluation
effects
global
change
biodiversity.
Fisheries Research,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
272, P. 106925 - 106925
Published: Jan. 5, 2024
Integrated
fisheries
stock
assessment
models
(SAMs)
and
integrated
population
(IPMs)
are
used
in
biological
ecological
systems
to
estimate
abundance
demographic
rates.
The
approaches
fundamentally
very
similar,
but
historically
have
been
considered
as
separate
endeavors,
resulting
a
loss
of
shared
vision,
practice
progress.
We
review
the
two
identify
similarities
differences,
with
view
identifying
key
lessons
that
would
benefit
more
generally
overarching
topic
ecology.
present
case
study
for
each
SAM
(snapper
from
west
coast
New
Zealand)
IPM
(woodchat
shrikes
Germany)
highlight
differences
similarities.
between
SAMs
IPMs
appear
be
objectives
parameter
estimates
required
meet
these
objectives,
size
spatial
scale
populations,
differing
availability
various
types
data.
In
addition,
up
now,
typical
applied
aquatic
habitats,
while
most
stem
terrestrial
habitats.
aim
assess
level
sustainable
exploitation
fish
so
absolute
or
biomass
must
estimated,
although
some
only
relative
trends.
Relative
is
often
sufficient
understand
dynamics
inform
conservation
actions,
which
main
objective
IPMs.
small
populations
concern,
where
uncertainty
can
important,
conveniently
implemented
using
Bayesian
approaches.
typically
at
moderate
scales
(1
104
km2),
possibility
collecting
detailed
longitudinal
individual
data,
whereas
large,
economically
valuable
stocks
large
(104
106
km2)
limited
There
sense
data-
(or
information-)
hungry
than
an
because
its
goal
abundance,
data
rates
difficult
obtain
(often
marine)
applied.
therefore
require
'tuning'
assumptions
IPMs,
'data
speak
themselves',
consequently
techniques
such
weighting
model
evaluation
nuanced
being
fit
disaggregated
quantify
variation
allow
richer
inference
on
processes.
attempts
example
by
unconditional
capture-recapture
Diversity and Distributions,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
24(11), P. 1657 - 1673
Published: June 12, 2018
Abstract
Aim
Accurate
predictions
of
cetacean
distributions
are
essential
to
their
conservation
but
limited
by
statistical
challenges
and
a
paucity
data.
This
study
aimed
at
comparing
the
capacity
various
algorithms
deal
with
biases
commonly
found
in
nonsystematic
surveys
evaluate
potential
for
citizen
science
data
improve
habitat
modelling
predictions.
An
endangered
population
humpback
whales
(
Megaptera
novaeangliae
)
breeding
ground
was
used
as
case
study.
Location
New
Caledonia,
Oceania.
Methods
Five
were
model
preferences
from
1,360
sightings
collected
over
14
years
research
surveys.
Three
different
background
sampling
approaches
tested
when
developing
models
625
crowdsourced
assess
methods
accounting
spatial
bias.
Model
evaluation
conducted
through
cross‐validation
prediction
an
independent
satellite
tracking
dataset.
Results
Algorithms
differed
complexity
environmental
relationships
modelled,
ecological
interpretability
transferability.
While
parameter
tuning
had
great
effect
on
performances,
GLM
s
generally
low
predictive
performance,
SVM
particularly
hard
interpret,
BRT
high
descriptive
power
showed
signs
overfitting.
MAXENT
especially
GAM
provided
valuable
trade‐off,
accurate
ecologically
intelligible.
Models
that
favoured
cool
(22–23°C)
shallow
waters
(0–100
m
deep)
coastal
well
offshore
areas.
Citizen
converged
survey
models,
specifically
Main
conclusions
Marine
megafauna
distribution
present
specific
may
be
addressed
integrative
evaluation,
testing
appropriately
tuned
algorithms.
Specifically,
controlling
overfitting
is
priority
predicting
large‐scale
perspectives.
appear
powerful
tool
describe
habitat.