Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 182, P. 117783 - 117783
Published: Dec. 26, 2024
Language: Английский
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 182, P. 117783 - 117783
Published: Dec. 26, 2024
Language: Английский
Exploration of neuroscience, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 4
Published: April 1, 2025
Neuropathic pain (NP) is a significant global health challenge, affecting an estimated 7–10% of the population. Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN), severe complication diabetes, impacts approximately one in every three patients. With rising prevalence PDN projected to become increasingly urgent concern. Current treatments for often provide inadequate relief and are associated with adverse side effects, emphasizing need safe effective therapeutic options. This review examines limitations existing pharmacological therapies presents sigma-1 receptor (S1R) as promising target. We explore biological role S1R, its implication NP PDN, structural biology, expanding preclinical clinical evidence supporting potential. Furthermore, we present various S1R antagonists addressing particular focus on E-52862 [18F]FTC-146. These compounds represent first-in-class ligands diagnostic applications, respectively, marking advances development antagonists. underscores potential antagonism strategy developing more ability significantly improve patient outcomes.
Language: Английский
Citations
0European Journal of Pain, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 29(1)
Published: Dec. 4, 2024
Abstract Background We report the efficacy and safety of E‐52862—a selective, sigma‐1 receptor antagonist—from phase 2, randomized, proof‐of‐concept studies in patients with moderate‐to‐severe, neuropathic, chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). Methods Adult (CPSP [ N = 116]; PDN 163]) were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to 4 weeks treatment E‐52862 n 55]; 85]) or placebo 61]; 78]) orally once daily. Pain intensity scores measured using numerical rating scale from 0 (no pain) 10 (worst imaginable). The primary analysis population comprised who received study drug ≥1 baseline on‐treatment observation (full set). Results In CPSP, mean average was 6.2 for vs. 6.5 placebo. Week change (CFB) −1.6 –0.9 (least squares difference [LSMD]: −0.9; p 0.029). PDN, 5.3 5.4 CFB −2.2 –2.1 (LSMD: –0.1; 0.766). Treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) reported 90.9% E‐52862‐treated 76.7% placebo‐treated CPSP 34.1% 26.9% PDN. Serious TEAEs occurred only: E‐52862: 5.5%; placebo: 6.7%. Conclusions demonstrated superior relief after weeks. Reductions seen E‐52862; high response rates may have prevented differentiation between treatments. had acceptable tolerability both populations. Significance Statement These validate mode action E‐52862, selective antagonist. resulted clinically meaningful relief. reductions findings are relevant given that neuropathic is highly incapacitating, lacking effective treatments representing significant unmet medical need, support further development antagonists peripheral pain.
Language: Английский
Citations
3Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 182, P. 117783 - 117783
Published: Dec. 26, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
0