Background:
It
is
a
well-known
fact
that
rufinamide
and
valproic
acid
(VPA)
are
antiepileptic
drugs
(AEDs)
indicated
for
epilepsy,
but
there
limited
data
to
show
their
relative
efficacy
safety.
This
study
evaluated
compared
against
VPA
as
the
monotherapy
choice
treatment
of
seizures.
challenge
identifying
right
each
patient
with
epilepsy
makes
it
one
most
difficult
types
neurological
disorders
diagnose
correctly
manage.
Methods:
The
132
patients
between
18-65
years
age
partial-onset
seizures
were
randomized
two
groups
which
first
(n=66)
received
up
400
mg
twice
daily
while
second
extended-release
1500
during
48
weeks
period.
endpoints
seizure
reduction
by
28
days
(at
least
50%
responders'
rate)
freedom
at
6
months,
both
associated
quality
life.
Safety
tolerability
final
important
aspects
well.
Results:
Taking
12-week
treatment,
rufinamide's
marked
median
percent
in
frequency
much
higher
than
VPA's
(45.1
vs
33.4%;
p<0.0001).
While
more
subjects
group
had
≥50%
decrease
(52.9%
33.6%,
p<0.001),
latter
still
achieved
significant
outcomes.
consequences
caused
grades
life
scores
decrease.
Adverse
events
often
similar,
discontinuations
occurred
due
side
effects
(3.6%
4.4%).
Conclusions:
effectiveness
RUF
have
terms
control
remains
similar;
however,
Rufinamide
efficient,
being
same
cases.
In
case
Rufinamide,
effect
positive,
this
medication
well-tolerated
epilepsy.
Pharmacological Reports,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
76(1), P. 216 - 222
Published: Nov. 28, 2023
Anticonvulsant
effects
of
imperatorin
(IMP)
have
been
experimentally
confirmed
earlier,
but
no
information
is
available
on
the
interaction
profiles
this
naturally
occurring
coumarin
when
combined
with
novel
antiseizure
medication
(ASMs).
This
study
aimed
to
determine
IMP
anticonvulsant
lacosamide
(LCM),
oxcarbazepine
(OXC),
pregabalin
(PGB),
and
topiramate
(TPM)
in
maximal
electroshock-induced
seizure
(MES)
model
mice.
The
exerted
by
ASMs
(LCM,
OXC,
PGB,
TPM)
constant
doses
(25
50
mg/kg)
underwent
isobolographic
transformation
precisely
classify
observed
interactions
mouse
MES
model.
Total
brain
concentrations
were
measured
high-pressure
liquid
chromatography
exclude
pharmacokinetic
nature
among
tested
ASMs.
(50
significantly
enhanced
(p
<
0.01)
potency
LCM,
TPM
mildly
potentiated
action
TPM,
statistical
significance
was
reported
for
these
combinations.
data
from
test
revealed
that
additive.
Moreover,
did
not
affect
total
content
any
experimental
additive
accompanied
changes
are
worthy
recommendation
further
studies.
Background:
It
is
a
well-known
fact
that
rufinamide
and
valproic
acid
(VPA)
are
antiepileptic
drugs
(AEDs)
indicated
for
epilepsy,
but
there
limited
data
to
show
their
relative
efficacy
safety.
This
study
evaluated
compared
against
VPA
as
the
monotherapy
choice
treatment
of
seizures.
challenge
identifying
right
each
patient
with
epilepsy
makes
it
one
most
difficult
types
neurological
disorders
diagnose
correctly
manage.
Methods:
The
132
patients
between
18-65
years
age
partial-onset
seizures
were
randomized
two
groups
which
first
(n=66)
received
up
400
mg
twice
daily
while
second
extended-release
1500
during
48
weeks
period.
endpoints
seizure
reduction
by
28
days
(at
least
50%
responders'
rate)
freedom
at
6
months,
both
associated
quality
life.
Safety
tolerability
final
important
aspects
well.
Results:
Taking
12-week
treatment,
rufinamide's
marked
median
percent
in
frequency
much
higher
than
VPA's
(45.1
vs
33.4%;
p<0.0001).
While
more
subjects
group
had
≥50%
decrease
(52.9%
33.6%,
p<0.001),
latter
still
achieved
significant
outcomes.
consequences
caused
grades
life
scores
decrease.
Adverse
events
often
similar,
discontinuations
occurred
due
side
effects
(3.6%
4.4%).
Conclusions:
effectiveness
RUF
have
terms
control
remains
similar;
however,
Rufinamide
efficient,
being
same
cases.
In
case
Rufinamide,
effect
positive,
this
medication
well-tolerated
epilepsy.