Esculapio,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
20(1), P. 21 - 24
Published: April 28, 2023
Objective:
To
assess
the
accuracy
of
transvaginal
sonography
in
detection
adenomyosis,
with
histopathological
examination
serving
as
gold
standard,
among
a
population
women
struggling
infertility.
Material
and
Methods:
In
this
study,
group
193
infertility
&
suspected
adenomyosis
was
included.
Each
subject
examined
using
ultrasound,
followed
by
surgical
interventions
such
dilatation
curettage,
accompanied
detailed
follow-up
assessments.
The
effectiveness
identifying
evaluated
comparing
it
to
diagnosis.
Results:
Histopathological
analysis
confirmed
162
(83.9%)
patients,
whereas
identified
151
(78.2%).
sensitivity,
specificity,
positive
predictive
value,
negative
value
overall
diagnosing
were
calculated
be
90.74%,
87.10%,
97.35%,
64.29%,
90.16%,
respectively.
Conclusion:
Transvaginal
demonstrates
considerable
sensitivity
specificity
obviating
necessity
for
supplementary
diagnostic
investigations.
Vaccines,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
12(3), P. 241 - 241
Published: Feb. 26, 2024
In
all
pivotal
trials
of
COVID-19
vaccines,
the
history
previous
SARS-CoV-2
infection
was
mentioned
as
one
main
exclusion
criteria.
absence
clinical
trials,
observational
studies
are
primary
source
for
evidence
generation.
This
study
aims
to
describe
patient-reported
adverse
drug
reactions
(ADRs)
following
first
vaccination
cycle,
well
administration
booster
doses
different
vaccine
brands,
in
people
with
prior
infection,
compared
infection-free
matched
cohorts
vaccinees.
A
web-based
prospective
conducted
collecting
vaccinee-reported
outcomes
through
electronic
questionnaires
from
eleven
European
countries
period
February
2021–February
2023.
baseline
questionnaire
and
up
six
follow-up
collected
data
on
vaccinee’s
characteristics,
solicited
unsolicited
reactions.
Overall,
3886
902
vaccinees
having
received
dose
or
a
dose,
respectively,
were
included
analysis.
After
reported
at
least
ADR
higher
frequency
than
those
without
(3470
[89.6%]
vs.
2916
[75.3%],
614
[68.2%]
546
[60.6%],
respectively).
On
contrary
side,
after
second
lower
frequency,
controls
(1443
[85.0%]
1543
[90.9%]).
The
median
time
onset
recovery
similar
across
cohorts.
individuals
who
Vaxzevria
Spikevax
doses.
serious
ADRs
low
Data
this
large-scale
could
be
used
inform
likelihood
effects
based
their
age,
sex,
type
administered.
line
safety
profile
vaccines
also
confirmed
infection.
Vaccines,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
11(4), P. 826 - 826
Published: April 11, 2023
Severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
coronavirus
2
(SARS-CoV-2)
is
an
emerging
viral
zoonotic
illness
that
has
developed
a
distinctive
and
threatening
situation
globally.
Worldwide,
many
vaccines
were
introduced
to
fight
against
the
COVID-19
pandemic.
The
present
study
aims
compare
bio-pharmacological
characteristics,
indications,
contraindications,
efficacy,
adverse
effects
of
inactivated
whole-virus
vaccines,
Sinopharm,
CoronaVac,
Covaxin.
Initially,
262
documents
6
international
organizations
selected.
Finally,
41
articles,
fact
sheets,
included.
data
recorded
from
World
Health
Organization
(WHO),
Food
Drug
Administration
(FDA)
USA,
Web
Science,
PubMed,
EMBASE,
Scopus.
results
demonstrated
these
three
Covaxin,
received
emergency
approval
FDA/WHO,
all
are
beneficial
for
prevention
Sinopharm
vaccine
been
recommended
during
pregnancy
people
age
groups,
CoronaVac
Covaxin
over
18
years
older.
These
have
intramuscular
doses
0.5
mL
each,
with
3–4
week
interval.
can
be
stored
in
refrigerator
at
+2
+8
°C.
common
pain
injection
site,
redness,
fatigue,
headache,
myalgias,
general
lethargy,
body
ache,
arthralgia,
nausea,
chills,
fever,
dizziness.
overall
mean
efficiency
disease
73.78%
70.96%
61.80%
In
conclusion,
However,
evidence
suggests
impact
slightly
better
than
Health Science Reports,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
6(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2023
Abstract
Background
Coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID‐19)
vaccine
side
effects
have
an
important
role
in
the
hesitancy
of
general
population
toward
administration.
Therefore,
this
study
was
conducted
to
document
COVID‐19
our
population.
Materials
and
Methods
An
online
survey‐based,
cross‐sectional
carried
out
from
September
1,
2021,
October
among
public.
The
questionnaire
included
participants’
sociodemographic
data,
type
vaccine,
comorbidities,
previous
infection,
assessment
reported
by
them.
Results
majority
participants
were
<20
years
age
(62.2%),
females
(74.9%),
belonged
educational
sector
(58.1%),
residents
Sindh
(65.7%),
previously
unaffected
infection
(73.3%).
Sinovac
(38.7%)
followed
Sinopharm
(30.4%)
Moderna
(18.4%)
administered
more
frequently.
Commonly
injection
site
pain
(82%),
myalgia
(55%),
headache
(46%),
fatigue/malaise
(45%),
fever
(41%).
Vaccine
likely
be
with
first
dose
as
compared
second
dose.
On
regression
analysis,
factors
associated
occurrence
younger
(odds
ratio
[OR]:
6.000
[2.065–17.431],
p
<
0.001),
female
gender
(OR:
2.373
[1.146–4.914],
=
0.020),
marital
status
0.217
[0.085–0.556],
graduate
level
education
0.353
[0.153–0.816],
0.015),
occupation
being
either
retired,
freelancers,
or
social
workers
0.310
[0.106–0.909]),
0.033).
Previous
(
0.458)
comorbidities
found
unrelated
0.707)
effects.
Conclusion
overall
prevalence
local
quite
higher
than
systemic
ones.
Further
large‐scale
studies
on
safety
are
required
strengthen
public
confidence
vaccination
drive.
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
19(2)
Published: June 23, 2023
Vaccine
hesitancy
(VH)
is
not
a
new
phenomenon
in
Pakistan
and
regarded
as
one
of
the
primary
causes
unsatisfactory
vaccination
campaigns.
This
study
determined
post-vaccination
COVID−19
VH,
factors
influencing
vaccine
uptake,
public's
intent
to
receive
booster
vaccinations.
A
cross-sectional
was
conducted
among
adult
population
Lahore,
Pakistan.
Participants
were
recruited
via
convenience
sampling
between
March
May
2022.
SPSS
version
22
used
for
data
analysis.
total
650
participants
included
(age
=
28.1
±
9.7
years;
male-to-female
ratio
nearly
1:
1).
The
majority
received
Sinopharm
followed
by
Sinovac
vaccine.
top
three
reasons
uptake
"only
vaccinated
individuals
are
allowed
at
workplace,
educational
institutes"
(Relative
importance
index
(RII)
0.749),
people
go
markets,
malls
other
public
places"
(RII
0.746),
"protect
myself
from
infection"
0.742).
mean
VH
score
24.5
6.2
(95%
CI
23.9–24.9),
with
being
pro-vaccines
poor
economic
status
significant
predictors
immunized
(p
<
.05).
Acceptance
vaccines
negatively
associated
younger
age
lower
level
education.
Furthermore,
pro-vaccine
greater
likelihood
accepting
.001).
Pakistani
continues
express
toward
vaccines.
Therefore,
aggressive
measures
must
be
taken
combat
community
that
contribute
it.
Italian Journal of Medicine,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
18(2)
Published: April 30, 2024
One
of
the
biggest
global
health
threats
is
vaccine
hesitancy
and
it
remains
a
issue.
The
speed
at
which
vaccines
are
developed
media
misinformation
contribute
to
reluctance.
This
study
examined
relationship
between
acceptance
COVID-19
infection.
A
cross-sectional
was
used
with
sample
1388
subjects
including
students
academic
staff.
Data
were
collected
using
self-administered
Vaccine
Acceptance
Behavior
questionnaire,
has
nine
dimensions
42
items
asks
about
infection
frequency
timing.
mean
behavior
scores
hesitant
low.
Low
trust
in
(25.4%)
main
reason
for
hesitancy.
positively
correlated
increased
rates
(P≤0.001).
can
reduce
rates,
protect
vulnerable
populations,
aid
public
efforts
control
virus.
Vaccine X,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
15, P. 100405 - 100405
Published: Nov. 8, 2023
The
negative
impact
of
vaccine
conspiracies
is
linked
with
health
behavior.
aim
the
current
study
was
to
examine
association
between
attitudes
toward
booster
COVID-19,
influenza,
and
monkeypox
(mpox)
vaccinations
post-COVID-19
side
effects,
conspiracies,
attitude
towards
mandatory
vaccination
among
nurses
physicians
in
Jordan.
Cureus,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: June 22, 2024
Background:
The
COVID-19
pandemic,
caused
by
severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
coronavirus
2
(SARS-CoV-2),
has
prompted
urgent
efforts
to
develop
and
deploy
effective
vaccines.
Covishield
Covaxin
are
two
prominent
vaccines
authorized
for
emergency
use;
however,
concerns
regarding
their
safety
persist.
Objective:
This
longitudinal
follow-up
study
aimed
comprehensively
assess
compare
the
demographic
characteristics,
frequencies,
severities
of
reported
side
effects,
associations
between
vaccine
type
factors
among
individuals
vaccinated
with
Covaxin.
Methods:
A
telephonic
questionnaire
was
used
collect
data
from
who
attended
vaccination
programs
January
1,
2021,
2022.
Logistic
regression
analysis
performed
investigate
type,
factors,
likelihood
experiencing
effects.
Results:
recipients
exhibited
a
lower
incidence
mild
flu-like
illness
(16
cases)
post-vaccination
infection
(55
than
(110
98
cases,
respectively).
However,
more
cases
soreness
at
injection
site
(139
did
(172
cases).
revealed
significantly
higher
odds
effects
(OR
=
1.687,
p
<
0.001).
Age
inversely
associated
0.982,
0.001),
while
sex
ethnicity
also
significant
associations.
Conclusion:
provides
valuable
insights
into
profiles
These
findings
underscore
importance
ongoing
surveillance
evaluation
tolerability
inform
public
health
policies
strategies.
Medical Principles and Practice,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 1 - 33
Published: Dec. 19, 2024
Although
COVID-19
vaccines
exhibit
diverse
side
effects,
taste
and
saliva
secretory
disorders
have
remained
poorly
understood
despite
their
negative
impact
on
the
overall
quality
of
life.
The
present
study
aimed
to
characterize
oral
adverse
effects
following
vaccination
assess
similarities
with
symptoms
in
patients.
A
literature
search
was
conducted
databases,
including
PubMed,
LitCovid,
Google
Scholar,
retrieve
relevant
studies.
narrative
review
indicated
that
a
certain
number
vaccinated
people
develop
ageusia,
dysgeusia,
hypogeusia,
xerostomia,
dry
mouth,
while
they
are
rare
compared
symptoms.
prevalence
varies
by
country/region
such
geographical
differences
may
be
related
type
vaccine
used.
Similar
SARS-CoV-2
infection,
adversely
affects
perception
salivary
secretion
females
older
subjects
more
frequently
than
males
younger
subjects.
Their
impairments
mostly
appear
withing
three
days
after
vaccination,
bitter
is
specifically
impaired
some
cases.
Considering
share
characteristics
patients,
it
speculated
spike
protein
derived
from
infection
pathophysiologically
responsible
for
disorders.
This
because
has
potential
interact
ACE2
expressed
cells,
produce
proinflammatory
cytokines,
form
antiphospholipid
antibodies.
Our
results
do
not
deny
advantage
but
attention
should
paid
post-vaccination
addition
Objective:
COVID-19
caused
a
deleterious
impact
on
the
health
care
system
globally.The
roll
out
of
vaccines
seems
to
be
only
effective
way
curtail
spread
disease.The
purpose
this
study
is
assess
dermatological
adverse
effect
post
COVID-19vaccination
gender
basis.
Methodology:
This
was
an
observational,cross-sectional,questionnaire-based
survey
conducted
in
Pakistan.The
sample
comprises
518
participants.
The
questionnaire
self-designed.
trial
lasted
six
months,
from
August
1,
2022,
until
January
31,
2023.
We
used
non-probability
sampling
technique.Dermatological
effects
like
burning
pain,
redness,
rashes,
and
lymphadenopathy
at
injection
site
were
recorded.Fever
also
noted.
All
participants
have
received
booster
shots
or
double
doses
any
one
CCOVID-19
vaccines,
such
as
AstraZeneca,
Pfizer,
Sinovac,
Sinopharm,Pakvac,
etc.
A
p-value
less
than
0.05
considered
statistically
significant.Qualitative
data
reported
frequency
percentage,
quantitativedata
standard
deviation
mean.
Results:
included
subjects,
whom
262
males
256
females.
mean
age
male
42.70±14.05
years
female
39.04±14.6years
with
significant
difference
observed
between
them
(p=0.004).
most
common
complaint
among
after
first
pain.
106(40.5%)
132(51.6%)
painwith
(p=0.011)
followed
by
swelling
which
92(35.1%)
120(46.9%)
females
(p=0.006).Burning
148(57.8%)
them(p<0.001).
Fever
quite
commonly
both
116(44.3%)
178(69.5%)
significantdifference
(p<0.001),Likewise
2nd
dose
vaccination,
pain
noted
90(34.4%)
124(48.4%)
(p=0.001).
Moreover,
80(30.5%)
malesand
(p<0.001).
rashes
by76(29.0%)
100(39.1%)
(p=0.016),
significantly
associated
genders,
Conclusion:
concluded
that
pain,redness,rashes,and
lymphadenopathywere
prevalent
side
1st
2ndCOVID-19
vaccination.Furthermore
fever
majority
subjects.In
addition
higher
percentage
recorded
comparedto
males.
Keywords:
vaccine
effects,
fever.