Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
70(4), P. 498 - 508
Published: June 14, 2023
Abstract
Magnetic
resonance
imaging
(MRI)
is
being
integrated
into
routine
radiation
therapy
(RT)
planning
workflows.
To
reap
the
benefits
of
this
modality,
patient
positioning,
image
acquisition
parameters
and
a
quality
assurance
programme
must
be
considered
for
accurate
use.
This
paper
will
report
on
implementation
retrofit
MRI
Simulator
RT
planning,
demonstrating
an
economical,
resource
efficient
solution
to
improve
accuracy
in
setting.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
27, P. 100484 - 100484
Published: July 1, 2023
Background
and
Purpose
Physiological
motion
impacts
the
dose
delivered
to
tumours
vital
organs
in
external
beam
radiotherapy
particularly
particle
therapy.
The
excellent
soft-tissue
demarcation
of
4D
magnetic
resonance
imaging
(4D-MRI)
could
inform
on
intra-fractional
motion,
but
long
image
reconstruction
times
hinder
its
use
online
treatment
adaptation.
Here
we
employ
techniques
from
high-performance
computing
reduce
4D-MRI
below
two
minutes
facilitate
their
MR-guided
radiotherapy.Material
Methods
Four
patients
with
pancreatic
adenocarcinoma
were
scanned
a
radial
stack-of-stars
gradient
echo
sequence
1.5T
MR-Linac.
Fast
parallelised
open-source
implementations
extra-dimensional
golden-angle
sparse
parallel
algorithm
developed
for
central
processing
unit
(CPU)
graphics
(GPU)
architectures.
We
assessed
impact
architecture,
oversampling
respiratory
binning
strategy
time
compared
images
using
structural
similarity
(SSIM)
index
against
MATLAB
reference
implementation.
Scaling
bottlenecks
different
architectures
studied
multi-GPU
systems.Results
All
reconstructed
identical
implementation
(SSIM
>
0.99).
Images
overlapping
bins
sharper
at
cost
longer
times.
CPU
+
GPU
was
over
17
faster
than
implementation,
reconstructing
60
±
1
seconds
hyper-scaled
multiple
GPUs.Conclusion
Respiratory-resolved
can
be
reduced
methods
workflows
potential
applications
Seminars in Radiation Oncology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
34(1), P. 135 - 144
Published: Dec. 15, 2023
Magnetic
resonance
image
guided
radiation
therapy
(MRIgRT)
is
a
relatively
new
technology
that
has
already
shown
outcomes
benefits
but
not
yet
reached
its
clinical
potential.
The
improved
soft-tissue
contrast
provided
with
MR,
coupled
the
immediacy
of
acquisition
respect
to
treatment,
enables
expansion
on-table
adaptive
protocols,
currently
at
cost
increased
treatment
complexity,
use
human
resources,
and
longer
slot
times,
which
translate
decreased
throughput.
Many
approaches
are
being
investigated
meet
these
challenges,
including
development
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
algorithms
accelerate
automate
much
workflow
parallelizes
tasks,
as
well
improvements
in
speed
quality.
This
article
summarizes
limitations
current
available
integrated
MRIgRT
systems
gives
an
outlook
about
scientific
developments
further
expand
MRIgRT.
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
70(S2), P. 107 - 113
Published: Jan. 5, 2023
Abstract
Magnetic
Resonance
Imaging
(MRI)
has
proven
value
in
radiotherapy
treatment
planning
(RTP).
MRI
provides
excellent
soft
tissue
contrast,
and
improves
lesion
detection,
definition
extent,
allowing
for
increased
conformal
treatment.
Recent
installation
of
dedicated
simulators
MRI‐guided
linear
accelerators
(MR
Linacs)
within
radiation
oncology
departments
led
to
a
sudden
rapid
expansion
the
scope
practice
many
therapists
radiographers.
The
lack
current
recommendations,
guidelines
credentialing
both
radiographers
working
these
atypical
environments
poses
significant
challenge
education
training
staff,
safe
operation
units.
This
commentary
discusses
pathways
entering
emerging
field
oncology,
future
role
radiographer
addressing
unique
issues
found
non‐standard
environments.
authors
draw
on
their
collective
experience
as
assisting
rollout
across
Australia
reflect
need
close
collaboration
between
radiographers,
respective
departments.
There
is
also
critical
professional
bodies
play
supporting
existing
roles
recognising
advanced
practitioner
practice.
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
25(1)
Published: Dec. 21, 2023
Abstract
Background
Magnetic
resonance
image
only
(MRI‐only)
simulation
for
head
and
neck
(H&N)
radiotherapy
(RT)
could
allow
single‐image
modality
planning
with
excellent
soft
tissue
contrast.
In
the
MRI‐only
workflow,
synthetic
computed
tomography
(sCT)
is
generated
from
MRI
to
provide
electron
density
information
dose
calculation.
Bone/air
regions
produce
little
signal
which
lead
misclassification
in
sCT.
Establishing
dosimetric
impact
of
this
error
inform
quality
assurance
(QA)
procedures
using
RT
or
compensatory
methods
accurate
Purpose
The
aim
study
was
investigate
if
Hounsfield
unit
(HU)
voxel
misassignments
sCT
images
result
errors
clinical
treatment
plans.
Methods
Fourteen
H&N
cancer
patients
undergoing
same‐day
CT
3T
were
retrospectively
identified.
deformed
multimodal
deformable
registration.
sCTs
T1w
DIXON
MRIs
a
commercially
available
deep
learning‐based
generator
(MRIplanner,
Spectronic
Medical
AB,
Helsingborg,
Sweden).
Tissue
assignment
quantified
by
creating
CT‐derived
HU
threshold
contour.
CT/sCT
differences
anatomical/target
contours
classification
including
air
(<250
HU),
adipose
(–250
–51
(–50
199
spongy
(200
499
HU)
cortical
bone
(>500
quantified.
t‐test
used
determine
sCT/CT
significant.
frequency
structures
that
had
difference
>
80
(the
window‐width
setting
intra‐cranial
structures)
establish
structure
accuracy.
Clinical
intensity
modulated
radiation
therapy
(IMRT)
plans
created
on
recalculated
compared
gamma
metric.
Results
mean
ratio
HUs
relative
air,
tissue,
1.7
±
0.3,
1.1
0.1,
1.0
0.9
0.1
0.8
(value
1
indicates
perfect
agreement).
T‐tests
(significance
set
at
t
=
0.05)
identified
values
CT.
note
left
right
(L/R)
cochlea
mandible
(>79%
tested
cohort),
oral
cavity
(for
57%
epiglottis
43%
cohort)
L/R
TM
joints
(occurring
29%
cohort).
case
joints,
these
contain
dense
bone/air
interfaces.
mandible,
suffer
additional
challenge
being
positionally
altered
versus
(due
non‐MR
safe
immobilizing
bite
block
requiring
absence
MR).
Finally,
suffers
its
small
size
unstable
positionality.
Plans
yielded
global/local
pass
rates
95.5%
2%
(3
mm,
3%)
92.7%
2.1%
(2
2%).
largest
D95,
D
,
D50
volume
histogram
(DVH)
metrics
organ‐at‐risk
(OAR)
tumor
volumes
(PTVs)
2.3%
3.0%
0.7%
1.9%
respectively.
Conclusions
cohort,
observed
but
did
not
translate
into
reduction
average
PTV/OAR
greater
than
3%.
For
sites
such
as
where
there
are
many
interfaces
we
observe
large
scale
deviations
further
studies
larger
retrospective
cohorts
merited
variation
accuracy
help
QA
limits
usage.
Cancers,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
16(23), P. 4013 - 4013
Published: Nov. 29, 2024
:
Spatial
fractionation
of
proton
fields
as
sub-millimeter
beamlets
to
treat
cancer
has
shown
better
sparing
healthy
tissue
whilst
maintaining
the
same
tumor
control.
It
is
critical
ensure
primary
standard
dosimetry
accurate
and
ready
support
modality's
clinical
implementation.
NMR in Biomedicine,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
37(12)
Published: Aug. 26, 2024
Abstract
This
work
proposes
MP‐Grasp4D
(magnetization‐prepared
golden‐angle
radial
sparse
parallel
4D)
MRI,
a
free‐breathing,
inversion
recovery
(IR)‐prepared,
time‐resolved
4D
MRI
technique
with
improved
T1‐weighted
contrast.
acquisition
incorporates
IR
preparation
into
gradient
echo
sequence.
employs
navi‐stack‐of‐stars
sampling
scheme,
where
imaging
data
of
rotating
stacks
and
navigator
(acquired
at
consistent
rotation
angle)
are
alternately
acquired.
The
used
to
estimate
temporal
basis
for
low‐rank
subspace‐constrained
reconstruction.
allows
the
simultaneous
capture
both
IR‐induced
contrast
changes
respiratory
motion.
One
frame
volume
in
is
reconstructed
from
single
stack
an
adjacent
on
average,
resulting
nominal
resolution
0.16
seconds
per
volume.
Images
corresponding
optimal
time
(TI)
can
be
retrospectively
selected
providing
best
image
Reader
studies
were
conducted
assess
performance
liver
across
30
subjects
comparison
standard
Grasp4D
without
preparation.
received
significantly
higher
scores
(
P
<
0.05)
than
all
assessment
categories.
There
was
moderate
almost
perfect
agreement
(kappa
coefficient
0.42
0.9)
between
two
readers
quality
assessment.
When
scan
reduced,
preserves
quality,
demonstrating
additional
acceleration
capability.
improves
free‐breathing
eliminates
need
explicit
motion
compensation.
method
expected
valuable
different
applications
such
as
MR‐guided
radiotherapy.