Centering Communities in Conservation through Asset-Based Quality of Life Planning DOI
Jacob Campbell,

Christopher Jarrett,

Alaka Wali

et al.

Conservation and Society, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 21(1), P. 48 - 60

Published: Jan. 1, 2023

Healthy environments are fundamental to the quality of life communities worldwide. Yet, many efforts integrate environmental conservation with human well-being have struggled center local people or failed be flexible enough accommodate a diversity priorities. We present methodology for community engagement known as Quality Life (QoL) Planning—a form rapid assessment, reflection, and consensus-building rooted in assets. QoL Planning empowers drive agenda improve their through conservation. In this paper, we provide an overview process describe some positive outcomes it has generated. compare four case studies from different regions—two rural Amazonian Peru two urban peri-urban Chicago region United States—and assess major lessons insights. Lastly, enabling conditions that contribute success identify important considerations practitioners interested implementing methodology.

Language: Английский

Between monitoring and surveillance: Geographies of emerging drone technologies in contemporary conservation DOI Creative Commons
Naomi Millner, B. J. Newport, Chris Sandbrook

et al.

Progress in Environmental Geography, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 3(1), P. 17 - 39

Published: Feb. 4, 2024

Conservation has employed technologies for monitoring and visual capture since its inception in the nineteenth century. Since then, capacities of conservation have developed considerably, affording a wide range data relating to ecological change biodiversity loss. However, new introduce fresh ethical political issues into environmental protection, especially as they can be used – deliberately or accidentally collect information about human activities. This potential is important, given that many areas protection are also longstanding conflict. We focus here on implications surrounding drones, which photographic video footage include images humans. review approaches technology, visuality, surveillance across beyond geography over last two decades, teasing out conceptual support nuanced critical analysis drones. Our focuses ways drones alter (i) processes decision-making, (ii) dynamics fearmongering control, (iii) securitisation protected areas, (iv) production circulation (racial) stereotypes, (v) practices outcomes justice. unpack these themes through three case studies from our own fieldwork, clarifying intentional non-intentional emerge, will vital explore further future.

Language: Английский

Citations

16

Gap analysis of social science resources for conservation practice DOI Creative Commons
Diane Detoeuf, Emiel de Lange, Harriet Ibbett

et al.

Conservation Biology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 39(2)

Published: April 1, 2025

Abstract Conservation is an inherently social process—people collectively endeavor to enact conservation. Yet, in conservation science, research methodologies, training, and competency are less common than natural sciences. Globally, formal education training the sciences often unavailable or inaccessible practitioners, nonformal may help fill this gap. To identify potential opportunities, we implemented a global survey of practitioners their knowledge gaps science needs conducted gap analysis available resources. We compiled 449 resources, including 266 English‐language 183 non‐English‐languages resources into open‐access online database hosted by Social Science Partnership. Resources were categorized as communication, data collection, ethics human rights, intervention, impact evaluation, analysis. Most open access (90%) half specific practice. Survey responses ( n = 90) revealed demand for with analyses, ethics, rights considerations. found need organization leaders prioritize conservation, greater diversity accessible alternate mediums languages, tailored contexts, additional

Language: Английский

Citations

2

Transformation beyond conservation: how critical social science can contribute to a radical new agenda in biodiversity conservation DOI Creative Commons
Kate Massarella, Anja Nygren, Robert Fletcher

et al.

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 49, P. 79 - 87

Published: April 1, 2021

Multiple proposals for transforming biodiversity conservation have been put forward, yet critical exploration of how transformative change is conceptualised in this context lacking. Drawing on transformations to sustainability scholarship, we review recent conservation, considering the suggested goals and means transformation. We outline crucial role social scientific inquiry by highlighting two core contributions. First, science an analytical device that politicises pluralises debates second, it can help facililitate identification alternatives. then show such a approach operationalised within CONVIVA (Towards Convivial Conservation: Governing Human-Wildlife Interactions Anthropocene) project pursue conservation.

Language: Английский

Citations

96

Coexistence for Whom? DOI Creative Commons
Simon Pooley

Frontiers in Conservation Science, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 2

Published: Sept. 28, 2021

This perspective essay considers ethical and conceptual questions around who coexistence is for, it affects, to make happen. The introduction some approaches thinking about human-wildlife coexistence, debates on the utility of concept reasons for its current emergence into mainstream. It next outlines preliminary conception informing this essay. discussion challenges a narrow conservation-oriented framing offers insights from literatures stewardship relational values tackling these.

Language: Английский

Citations

57

Effectiveness of 20 years of conservation investments in protecting orangutans DOI Creative Commons
Truly Santika, Julie Sherman, Maria Voigt

et al.

Current Biology, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 32(8), P. 1754 - 1763.e6

Published: March 10, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

38

Leben mit Wölfen DOI
Thorsten Gieser

transcript Verlag eBooks, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Dec. 7, 2022

Die Wölfe kehren zurück nach Deutschland - und mit ihnen auch die Konflikte zwischen Mensch Wolf. Eine zentrale Rolle spielen dabei Affekte, Atmosphären, Gefühle Stimmungen, ihre Rückkehr auslöst. Über einen ethnografischen Zugriff untersucht Thorsten Gieser komplexe Verflechtung von Natur Gesellschaft im Anthropozän. Seine These: konfrontieren uns einem affektiven Rewilding stoßen damit Prozess an, als mehr-als-menschliche neu zu denken. Er zeigt Wege einer (friedlichen) Koexistenz auf, schlägt dazu ein komplexes Verständnis Wölfen affektive Akteure vor begreift somit das Wolf-Mensch-Verhältnis radikal neu.

Citations

33

Reversible pigs DOI Creative Commons
Aníbal G. Arregui

American Ethnologist, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 50(1), P. 115 - 128

Published: Jan. 13, 2023

Abstract The idea of “species” is the main unit for representing ecological relations. But what would an ecology look like if we started by tracing its relations from below species threshold? By deploying infraspecies ethnography, I show how, in suburban Barcelona, human and wild boar individuals relate personal, creative ways, how doing so, they also reshape their quotidian ecologies bottom up. Departing species‐level imaginaries wildlife managers, residents cope with boars not only as idiosyncratic specimens but reversible beings: pigs that are simultaneously “wild” “tame,” “rural” “urban,” “pest” “neighbor.” Shifting attention between coherent to situated encounters singular unveils weave relations, remake ecologies, navigate uncertainty emerging human‐animal intimacies.

Language: Английский

Citations

18

The application of reflexivity for conservation science DOI Creative Commons
Jacalyn M. Beck, Kevin C. Elliott,

Charlie R. Booher

et al.

Biological Conservation, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 262, P. 109322 - 109322

Published: Sept. 22, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

36

Apes and agriculture DOI Creative Commons
Erik Meijaard,

Nabillah Unus,

Thina Ariffin

et al.

Frontiers in Conservation Science, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 4

Published: Nov. 9, 2023

Non-human great apes – chimpanzees, gorillas, bonobos, and orangutans are threatened by agricultural expansion, particularly from rice, cacao, cassava, maize, oil palm cultivation. Agriculture replaces fragments ape habitats, bringing them closer to humans often resulting in conflict. Though the impact of agriculture on is well-recognized, there still a need for more nuanced understanding specific contexts associated negative impacts habitats populations. Here we review these their implications apes. We estimate that within African South-East Asian ranges, about 100 people each ape. Given most live outside strictly protected areas growing human population increasing demand resources landscapes, it will be challenging balance needs both Further habitat loss expected, Africa, where compromises must sought re-direct expansion driven subsistence farmers with small fields (generally <0.64 ha) away remaining habitats. To promote coexistence between apes, new approaches financial models implemented at local scales. Overall, optimized land use planning effective implementation, along strategic investments wildlife conservation, can improve synergies conservation food production. Effective governance financing crucial optimal outcomes security. Enforcing forest laws, engaging trade policy discussions, integrating policies trade, security, improved techniques, sustainable systems vital prevent further decline Saving requires thorough consideration contexts.

Language: Английский

Citations

14

Future coexistence with great apes will require major changes to policy and practice DOI
John C. Mitani, Ekwoge E. Abwe, Geneviève Campbell

et al.

Nature Human Behaviour, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 8(4), P. 632 - 643

Published: Feb. 19, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

5