The Impact of Anthropogenic Noise on Fish Behavior, Communication, and Development DOI Open Access
Julie M. Butler

Published: Nov. 4, 2019

Noise pollution is pervasive to nearly all aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems was labeled a pollutant of global concern by the World Health Organization in 2011. In past few decades, underwater ambient noise levels have risen almost 30 dB SPL re: 1 µPa frequency range that most fish produce detect acoustic stimuli due rises shipping, oil exploration, pile driving. Changes natural soundscape can impact aspects an animal’s life. My dissertation research takes integrative, whole-animal approach examining how increased background impacts behavior, physiology, development, communication. First, I found social interactions occurring noisy conditions were less effective. Males spent more time distracted or stressed during territorial fights, resulting longer fight resolution. also changed when they courted gravid females. Female hearing capabilities significantly reduced following exposure. male signal production, female detection capabilities, possibly itself interfere with effective Cumulatively, this resulted lower incidence spawning noise. exposure hindered mouthbrooding maternal care behaviors. Females exposed brooding likely cannibalize prematurely release under-developed juveniles. Juveniles development had growth rates, higher mortality, altered startle Finally, possess components proposed inner ear CRF-signaling system its expression mediated sex, reproductive state, Because noise-induced changes are dependent on physiological it possible threshold shifts could be modulated condition. Overall, these results provide one comprehensive pictures fish. By subtle, sub-lethal communication, we better inform conservation efforts before human-influenced reach potentially lethal levels.

Language: Английский

An overview of fish bioacoustics and the impacts of anthropogenic sounds on fishes DOI Creative Commons
Arthur N. Popper, A. D. Hawkins

Journal of Fish Biology, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 94(5), P. 692 - 713

Published: March 13, 2019

Fishes use a variety of sensory systems to learn about their environments and communicate. Of the various senses, hearing plays particularly important role for fishes in providing information, often from great distances, all around these animals. This information is three spatial dimensions, overcoming limitations other senses such as vision, touch, taste smell. Sound used communication between fishes, mating behaviour, detection prey predators, orientation migration habitat selection. Thus, anything that interferes with ability fish detect respond biologically relevant sounds can decrease survival fitness individuals populations. Since onset Industrial Revolution, there has been growing increase noise humans put into water. These anthropogenic are wide range sources include shipping, sonars, construction activities (e.g., wind farms, harbours), trawling, dredging exploration oil gas. Anthropogenic may be sufficiently intense result death or mortal injury. However, at lower levels temporary impairment, physiological changes including stress effects, behaviour masking sounds. The intent this paper review potential effects upon consequences populations ecosystems need develop sound exposure criteria regulations. assuming many readers not have background bioacoustics, first provides on underwater acoustics, focus introducing very concept particle motion, primary acoustic stimulus elasmobranchs. then material hearing, production behaviour. followed by an overview what known considers current guidelines being world-wide assess fishes. Most importantly, most complete summary date. It also made clear currently so gaps it almost impossible reach conclusions nature cause animal even physical harm. Further research required responses species different sources, under conditions. There both examine immediate longer-term terms likely impacts

Language: Английский

Citations

323

Enigmatic ear stones: what we know about the functional role and evolution of fish otoliths DOI
Tanja Schulz‐Mirbach, Friedrich Ladich, Martin Plath

et al.

Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 94(2), P. 457 - 482

Published: Sept. 21, 2018

ABSTRACT Otoliths in bony fishes play an important role the senses of balance and hearing. Otolith mass shape are, among others, likely to be decisive factors influencing otolith motion thus ear functioning. Yet our knowledge how exactly these influence is incomplete. In addition, experimental studies directly investigating function otoliths inner are scarce yield partly conflicting results. Herein, we discuss questions hypotheses on shape, relationship between sensory epithelium overlying otolith, motion. We ( i ) state‐of‐the‐art regarding function, ii gaps that remain filled, iii future approaches may improve understanding further link functional evolution solid teleost instead numerous tiny otoconia as found most other vertebrates. Until now, selective forces and/or constraints driving calcareous their diversity teleosts largely unknown. Based a data set structure more than 160 species covering main vertebrate groups, present hypothetical framework for evolution. suggest advent have initially been selectively neutral ‘by‐product’ key innovations during The teleost‐specific genome duplication event paved way diversification shape. shapes evolved along with considerable of, improvements in, auditory abilities fishes. However, phenotypic plasticity also creation different types, portions show degrees plasticity. Future should adopt phylogenetic perspective apply comparative methodologically integrative approaches, including fossil otoliths, when otoconia/otolith ear.

Language: Английский

Citations

161

Diversity in Fish Auditory Systems: One of the Riddles of Sensory Biology DOI Creative Commons
Friedrich Ladich, Tanja Schulz‐Mirbach

Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Journal Year: 2016, Volume and Issue: 4

Published: March 31, 2016

An astonishing diversity of inner ears and accessory hearing structures (AHS) that can enhance has evolved in fishes. Inner mainly differ the size otolith end organs, shape orientation sensory epithelia, patterns ciliary bundles hair cells. Despite our profound morphological knowledge ear variation, two main questions remain widely unanswered. (i) What selective forces and/or constraints led to evolution this diversity? (ii) How is variability linked abilities? Improved based on ability many fish species transmit oscillations swim bladder walls or other gas-filled bladders ears. Swim may be via a chain ossicles (in otophysans), anterior extensions (e.g. some cichlids, squirrelfishes), gas touch directly (labyrinth fishes). Studies catfishes cichlids demonstrate larger more pronounced linkages positively affect both auditory sensitivities detectable frequency range, but lack connection does not exclude enhancement. This abilities one riddles bioacoustics research. Hearing enhancement might have facilitate intraspecific acoustic communication. A comparison sound-producing species, however, indicates communication widespread taxa lacking AHS. Eco-acoustical are likely explanation for sensitivities. Low ambient noise levels facilitated AHS, enabling detect low-level abiotic sounds from con- heterospecifics, including predators prey. Aquatic habitats regimes, preliminary data indicate fishes vary accordingly.

Language: Английский

Citations

116

Sculpting the labyrinth: Morphogenesis of the developing inner ear DOI Creative Commons
Berta Alsina, Tanya T. Whitfield

Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology, Journal Year: 2016, Volume and Issue: 65, P. 47 - 59

Published: Sept. 29, 2016

The vertebrate inner ear is a precision sensory organ, acting as both microphone to receive sound and an accelerometer detect gravity motion. It consists of series interlinked, fluid-filled chambers containing patches epithelia, each with specialised function. contains many different differentiated cell types distinct morphologies, from the flask-shaped hair cells found in thickened epithelium, thin squamous that contribute non-sensory structures, such semicircular canal ducts. Nearly all ear, including afferent neurons innervate it, are derived otic placode, region cranial ectoderm develops adjacent embryonic hindbrain. As develops, epithelia grow, fold, fuse rearrange form complex three-dimensional shape membranous labyrinth. Much our current understanding processes morphogenesis comes genetic pharmacological manipulations developing mouse, chicken zebrafish embryos. These traditional approaches now being supplemented exciting new techniques—including force measurements light-sheet microscopy—that helping elucidate mechanisms generate this intricate organ system.

Language: Английский

Citations

65

Fish hearing “specialization” – a re-evaluation DOI
Arthur N. Popper, A. D. Hawkins, Joseph A. Sisneros

et al.

Hearing Research, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 425, P. 108393 - 108393

Published: Nov. 11, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

50

A regulatory network of Sox and Six transcription factors initiate a cell fate transformation during hearing regeneration in adult zebrafish DOI Creative Commons
Erin Jimenez, Claire C. Slevin, Wei Song

et al.

Cell Genomics, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 2(9), P. 100170 - 100170

Published: Aug. 22, 2022

Using adult zebrafish inner ears as a model for sensorineural regeneration, we ablated the mechanosensory receptors and characterized single-cell epigenome transcriptome at consecutive time points during hair cell regeneration. We utilized deep learning on regeneration-induced open chromatin sequences identified cell-specific transcription factor (TF) motif patterns. Enhancer activity correlated with gene expression potential regulatory networks. A pattern of overlapping Sox- Six-family TF binding motifs was detected, suggesting combinatorial program TFs driving regeneration identity. Pseudotime analysis transcriptomic data suggested that support cells within sensory epithelium changed identity to "progenitor" population could differentiate into cells. 2.6 kb DNA enhancer upstream sox2 promoter that, when deleted, showed dominant phenotype resulted in hair-cell-regeneration-specific deficit both lateral line ear.

Language: Английский

Citations

27

Wave Mechanics of the Vestibular Semicircular Canals DOI Creative Commons
Marta M. Iversen, Richard D. Rabbitt

Biophysical Journal, Journal Year: 2017, Volume and Issue: 113(5), P. 1133 - 1149

Published: Sept. 1, 2017

Language: Английский

Citations

40

Methods to study the development, anatomy, and function of the zebrafish inner ear across the life course DOI
Sarah Baxendale, Tanya T. Whitfield

Methods in cell biology, Journal Year: 2016, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 165 - 209

Published: Jan. 1, 2016

Language: Английский

Citations

39

Shaping of inner ear sensory organs through antagonistic interactions between Notch signalling and Lmx1a DOI Creative Commons
Zoë F. Mann,

Héctor Gálvez,

David Pedreno

et al.

eLife, Journal Year: 2017, Volume and Issue: 6

Published: Dec. 4, 2017

The mechanisms of formation the distinct sensory organs inner ear and non-sensory domains that separate them are still unclear. Here, we show several patches arise by progressive segregation from a common prosensory domain in embryonic chicken mouse otocyst. This process is regulated mutually antagonistic signals: Notch signalling Lmx1a. Notch-mediated lateral induction promotes fate. Some early Notch-active cells, however, normally diverted this fate increasing produces misshapen or fused chick. Conversely Lmx1a (or cLmx1b chick) allows organ antagonizing promoting commitment to Our findings highlight dynamic nature patch labile character sensory-competent progenitors, which could have facilitated emergence new their functional diversification course evolution.

Language: Английский

Citations

39

Paradox of otolith shape indices: routine but overestimated use DOI
Víctor M. Tuset, José Luís Otero-Ferrer, Carolina Correia Siliprandi

et al.

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 78(6), P. 681 - 692

Published: Jan. 4, 2021

The identification of fish species using otolith shape has been common in many fields the marine science. Different analytical processes can be applied for morphological discrimination, but reviewing literature we have found conceptual and statistical limitations use indices wavelets (contour analysis), being specially worrying first case due to their widespread routine use. In present study, 42 were classified applying traditional machine learning classifiers performance measures (accuracy, Cohen’s kappa statistic, sensitivity, precision). Our results conclusive; a more adequate option classification than indices, independently considered. artificial neural network support vector provided highest values all wavelets. cases, sensitivity precision pointed out higher confusion between some patterns indices. Therefore, strongly discourage species.

Language: Английский

Citations

26