Floral Cues and Flower Handling Tactics Affect Switching Decisions by Nectar-Foraging Bumble Bees
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: May 2, 2024
Abstract
Nectar
foraging
bees
change
their
use
of
floral
resources
as
plant
species
appear
in
the
environment
and
disappear
over
lifetimes.
The
new
flowers
used
may
involve
different
cues
nectar
extraction
tactics.
Although
bumble
can
adapt
to
changes
required
tactics,
little
is
known
about
whether
prioritize
switching
tactics
or
when
deciding
which
switch
to.
In
a
laboratory
assay,
we
forced
Bombus
impatiens
(common
eastern
bee)
workers
either
handling
tactic
they
were
using
continue
but
colour
artificial
foraged
on.
We
examined
bees’
tendency
was
influenced
by
how
similar
novel
familiar
ones.
conducted
2
×
factorial
experiment
flowers,
manipulating
that
initially
trained
(legitimate
visitation
robbing)
similarity
between
colours
(similar
distinct).
found
under
most
conditions
preferred
flower
retain
However,
given
experience
with
legitimate
markedly
from
those
had
experienced
previously,
tended
while
continuing
forage
on
same
colour.
These
findings
suggest
resource
currently
exploited
resource,
along
employed
bees,
jointly
plays
an
important
role
decision-making
bees.
Language: Английский
Learning to handle flowers increases pollen collection benefits for bees but does not affect pollination success for plants
Maggie M. Mayberry,
No information about this author
Katherine C. Naumer,
No information about this author
Annaliese N. Novinger
No information about this author
et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: May 12, 2024
ABSTRACT
Behavior
frequently
affects
cooperation
as
well
conflict
in
plant-pollinator
interactions.
Pollinators
such
bees
often
modify
how
they
handle
flowers
with
experience
and
learning
is
generally
assumed
to
increase
collection
of
floral
food
rewards.
The
complexity
flower
morphology
also
quickly
pollinators
learn
recall
access
rewards
from
a
given
type.
Because
can
extraction
(such
pollen)
involves
the
pollinator
altering
it
interacts
flower’s
reproductive
organs,
could
affect
pollination
success.
Yet
cognition
interact
success
unknown.
We
therefore
asked
memory
handling
by
pollen-foraging
generalist
bumble
(
Bombus
impatiens
)
varied
among
four
morphologically
distinct
types
(Phacelia
campanularia,
Exacum
affine
,
Solanum
elaeagnifolium
Erythranthe
guttata
affected
pollen
deposition
on
these
flowers.
found
that
learned
remembered
some
more
than
others.
Learning
typically
involved
development
motor
routines
unique
each
While
invariably
improve
collection,
type
did
not
collection.
Surprisingly,
was
bee
foraging
experience.
Thus,
even
though
benefits
bee,
does
alter
female
(and
potentially
male)
fitness
for
plant.
discuss
potential
reasons
patterns
consequences
behavior
evolution.
Language: Английский
Floral cues and flower-handling tactics affect switching decisions by nectar-foraging bumble bees
Minjung Baek,
No information about this author
Jonathan S. Garcia,
No information about this author
Daniel R. Papaj
No information about this author
et al.
Animal Behaviour,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
215, P. 163 - 175
Published: Aug. 3, 2024
Language: Английский
The Hole Truth: Why Do Bumble Bees Rob Flowers More Than Once?
Plants,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
13(17), P. 2507 - 2507
Published: Sept. 6, 2024
Primary
nectar-robbers
feed
through
holes
they
make
in
flowers,
often
bypassing
the
plant’s
reproductive
organs
process.
In
many
robbed
plants,
multiple
are
made
a
single
flower.
Why
flower
should
be
repeatedly
is
difficult
to
understand:
hole
signals
that
nectar
forager
has
already
fed,
which
would
seem
likely
predict
low
rewards.
We
tested
three
explanations
for
this
pattern
Corydalis
caseana
(Fumariaceae),
bumble
bee
pollinated
and
plant:
(1)
appear
only
after
all
flowers
have
been
once;
(2)
individual
foragers
during
visits;
(3)
it
more
profitable
bees
rob
older
even
if
robbed.
these
hypotheses
from
2014
2016
Colorado,
USA
population
using
data
on
robbing
rates
over
time,
floral
longevity,
accumulation
visited
unvisited
of
across
life
flowers.
Multiple
were
appearing
when
two-thirds
still
lacked
hole,
allowing
us
reject
first
hypothesis.
The
second
hypothesis
cannot
offer
full
explanation
because
35%
additional
appeared
one
or
days
was
made.
Repeated
sampling
bagged
exposed
inflorescences
revealed
filled
at
constant
rate
refilled
completely
being
drained.
Consequently,
young
consistently
value
compared
had
previously
robbed,
consistent
with
third
While
further
studies
needed,
results
simple
paradoxical
clustering
nectar-robbing
damage
possibly
other
plant
species.
Language: Английский