Ecology and Evolution,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
9(10), P. 5752 - 5765
Published: April 16, 2019
Identifying
the
processes
that
determine
avian
migratory
strategies
in
different
environmental
contexts
is
imperative
to
understanding
constraints
survival
and
reproduction
faced
by
birds
across
planet.We
compared
spring
migration
of
Fork-tailed
Flycatchers
(Tyrannus
s.
savana)
breed
at
south-temperate
latitudes
(i.e.,
austral
migrants)
vs.
tropical
intratropical
South
America.
We
hypothesized
migrant
flycatchers
are
more
time-selected
than
migrants
during
migration.
As
such,
we
predicted
migrants,
which
migrate
further
will
a
faster
rate
for
be
positively
correlated
with
onset
migration.We
attached
light-level
geolocators
two
breeding
sites
Brazil
Argentina
tracked
their
movements
until
following
season.Of
286
were
deployed,
37
recovered
~1
year
later,
28
provided
useable
data.
Rate
did
not
differ
significantly
between
groups,
only
one
site
was
there
positive
relationship
date
initiation
arrival
date.This
represents
first
comparison
individual
among
conspecific
passerines
temperate
suggests
America
on
conspecifics.
Low
sample
sizes
could
have
diminished
our
power
detect
differences
(e.g.,
sexes),
such
research
into
mechanisms
underpinning
this
poorly
understood
system
necessary.
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
97(4), P. 1231 - 1252
Published: Feb. 8, 2022
ABSTRACT
Global
movement
patterns
of
migratory
birds
illustrate
their
fascinating
physical
and
physiological
abilities
to
cross
continents
oceans.
During
voyages,
most
land
multiple
times
make
so‐called
‘stopovers’.
Our
current
knowledge
on
the
functions
stopover
is
mainly
based
proximate
study
departure
decisions.
However,
such
studies
are
insufficient
gauge
fully
ecological
evolutionary
stopover.
If
we
how
a
focal
trait,
e.g.
changes
in
energy
stores,
affects
decision
depart
from
without
considering
trait(s)
that
actually
caused
bird
land,
unfavourable
environmental
conditions
for
flight,
misinterpret
function
It
thus
important
realise
acknowledge
stopovers
have
many
different
functions,
not
every
migrant
has
same
(set
of)
reasons
stop‐over.
Additionally,
may
obtain
contradictory
results
because
significance
traits
context
dependent.
For
instance,
late
spring
migrants
be
more
prone
risk‐taking
with
lower
stores
than
early
migrants.
Thus,
neglect
decisions
subject
selection
minimise
immediate
(mortality
risk)
and/or
delayed
(low
future
reproductive
output)
fitness
costs.
To
alleviate
these
issues,
first
define
as
an
interruption
endurance
flight
costs
.
Second,
review
all
probable
stopover,
which
include
accumulating
energy,
various
forms
recovery
avoiding
adverse
list
potential
other
less
well
studied,
minimising
predation,
exhaustion
spatiotemporal
adjustments
migration.
Third,
derived
aspects,
argue
paradigm
shift
ecology
research.
This
includes
focusing
why
individual
interrupts
its
likely
identify
individual‐specific
function(s)
correctly
departure‐decision
studies.
Moreover,
highlight
selective
forces
acting
dependent
expected
differ
between,
K
−/
r
‐selected
species,
sexes
migration
strategies.
example,
else
being
equal,
species
survival
rate,
high
rate)
should
stronger
urge
continue
or
resume
increase
suffered
offset
by
higher
success
subsequent
breeding
season.
Finally,
propose
focus
mechanisms
controlling
landing
decisions,
ultimate
shaping
ideas
limited
but
can
applied
any
species.
revised
definition
proposed
stimulate
fruitful
discussion
towards
better
understanding
Furthermore,
identifying
will
support
targeted
measures
conserve
restore
functionality
sites
threatened
anthropogenic
changes.
especially
long‐distance
migrants,
currently
alarming
decline.
Scientific Reports,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
8(1)
Published: March 1, 2018
Faster
migration
in
spring
than
autumn
seems
to
be
a
common
pattern
birds.
This
has
been
ultimately
explained
by
seasonally
different
selection
pressures.
Variation
speed
is
proximately
caused
adjusting
travel
(distance
covered
during
flight)
and/or
stopover
duration
(times
when
birds
rest
and
refuel).
Yet,
it
remains
unclear
whether
individual
seasonal
differences
match
the
what
precise
role
of
proximate,
behavioural
mechanisms
for
is.
By
reviewing
64
studies
401
tracks,
I
show
that
waders,
gulls,
swifts,
songbirds
speeds
were
significantly
higher
spring,
while
opposite
was
case
waterfowl
owls.
Thus,
ultimate
selecting
faster
might
not
consistently
act
across
bird
groups.
Breeding
latitude,
strategy,
distance,
flight
style,
body
mass,
sex
did
explain
speed.
The
ratio
between
total
257
tracks
negatively
affected
same
individuals
comparative
analysis
accounting
shared
ancestry.
Seasonal
variation
appears
thus
main
biological
mechanism
regulating
Movement Ecology,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
8(1)
Published: Feb. 7, 2020
Songbirds
following
distinct
migration
strategies
(e.g.
long-
vs.
short-
to
medium-distance
migrants)
often
differ
in
their
speed
of
during
autumn
and,
thus,
are
assumed
face
different
time
constraints.
During
migration,
most
songbird
species
alternate
migratory
flights
with
stopover
periods.
Many
them
restrict
these
the
night,
i.e.,
they
nocturnal
migrants.
At
stopover,
migrants
need
select
a
specific
night
(night-to-night
decision)
and
(within-night
resume
migration.
These
departure
decisions,
which
largely
determine
jointly
affected
by
set
intrinsic
extrinsic
factors,
cues.
Here
we
aim
assess
whether
factors
magnitude
respective
effects
on
decisions
differs
between
nocturnally
migrating
species,
depending
strategy
associated
constraints.We
radio-tracked
Northern
Wheatears
(Oenanthe
oenanthe;
long-distance
migrant),
European
robins
(Erithacus
rubecula)
Common
Blackbirds
(Turdus
merula;
both
analysed
night-to-night
within-night
timing
relation
factors.Species
generally
differed
temporal
scales,
shortest
stopovers
earliest
departures
migrant.
Some
such
as
day
year,
fuel
load,
cloud
cover
crosswind,
had
consistent
all
three
species.
However,
tailwind
assistance,
change
atmospheric
pressure
air
temperature
decisions.
Whereas
were
either
or
one
migrants,
not
found
migrant.Our
results
suggest
that
general
songbirds
is
species-specific
Further,
imply
assessment
usage
weather
conditions,
cues
adjusted
based
this
strategy,
being
least
selective
at
departure.
Other
however,
seem
be
used
independent
strategy.
Movement Ecology,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
8(1)
Published: Feb. 4, 2020
Abstract
Movement,
from
foraging
to
migration,
is
known
be
under
the
influence
of
environment.
The
translation
environmental
cues
individual
movement
decision
making
determined
by
an
individual’s
internal
state
and
anticipated
balance
costs
benefits.
General
body
condition,
metabolic
hormonal
physiology
mechanistically
underpin
this
state.
These
physiological
determinants
are
tightly,
often
genetically
linked
with
each
other
hence
central
a
mechanistic
understanding
movement.
We
here
synthesise
available
evidence
drivers
signatures
review
(1)
how
as
measured
in
its
most
coarse
way
condition
correlates
decisions
during
foraging,
migration
dispersal,
(2)
changes
underlie
these
strategies
(3)
can
molecular
pathways.
reveale
that
high
facilitates
efficiency
routine
dispersal
migration.
Dispersal
is,
however,
some
cases
stimulated
decreased
condition.
Many
biotic
abiotic
stressors
induce
initiate
cascade
vertebrates
through
production
stress
hormones.
Movement
therefore
associated
hormone
levels
but
also
insects,
interaction
factors
related
or
social
underlying
mechanisms
currently
studied
few
model
species,
show
–in
congruence
our
insights
on
role
condition-
energy
metabolism
glycolysis,
coupling
timing
processes
Molecular
into
basis
remain,
highly
refractory.
finalise
critical
reflection
importance
feedbacks
for
better
effects
ecological
dynamics
at
all
biological
organization.
Ornithological Applications,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
123(1)
Published: Feb. 1, 2021
Abstract
Stopovers
comprise
a
significant
proportion
of
the
time
that
many
birds
spend
migrating,
and
researchers
have
long
relied
on
these
events
to
define
classify
broader
migratory
strategies.
Analyses
stopovers
often
assume
individuals
stop
primarily
or
exclusively
in
order
replenish
energy
stores,
but
other
non-fueling
behaviors
also
been
described
during
stopover
can
influence
incidence
duration.
Here,
we
discuss
growing
demand
for
understanding
restoring
inherent
behavioral
complexity
events.
We
begin
by
describing
how
light-weight
tracking
technologies
allow
follow
along
their
entire
journeys,
capturing
controvert
traditional
stop–refuel–resume
paradigm.
then
5
well-identified
behaviors—recovering,
sleeping,
waiting,
information
gathering,
social
interactions—and
examine
including
alter
interpretations
individual
movement
paths.
Finally,
outline
emerging
directions
identifying
look
larger
implications
population
management
site
conservation
flyways.
Current Zoology,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
66(1), P. 21 - 28
Published: March 7, 2019
Abstract
In
many
animals,
catabolic
and
anabolic
periods
are
temporally
separated.
Migratory
birds
alternate
energy
expenditure
during
flight
with
accumulation
stopover.
The
size
of
the
stores
at
stopover
affects
decision
to
resume
migration
thus
temporal
organization
migration.
We
now
provide
data
suggesting
that
it
is
not
only
per
se
may
influence
scheduling,
but
also
physiological
consequences
flying.
two
subspecies
northern
wheatear
Oenanthe
oenanthe,
a
long-distance
migrant,
estimated
autumn
were
positively
related
both
constitutive
innate
acquired
immune
function,
negatively
oxidative
damage
lipids.
other
words,
migrants’
condition
was
associated
their
energetic
condition.
Although
time
spent
before
sampling
have
contributed
this
relationship,
our
results
suggest
migrants
trade-off
depletion
incurring
costs.
This
will
affect
decisions
when
start
terminate
migratory
flight.
costs
help
explaining
why
often
arrive
depart
from
sites
larger
than
expected.
propose
studies
on
role
as
drivers
(avian)
need
consider
condition,
such
immunological
states.
Oecologia,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
188(4), P. 1011 - 1024
Published: Nov. 1, 2018
Stopovers
play
a
crucial
role
for
the
success
of
migrating
animals
and
are
key
to
optimal
migration
theory.
Variation
in
refuelling
rates,
stopover
duration
departure
decisions
among
individuals
has
been
related
several
external
factors.
The
physiological
mechanisms
shaping
ecology
are,
however,
less
well
understood.
Here,
we
explore
how
immune
function
blood
parasite
infections
relate
aspects
behaviour
autumn
short-
long-distance
songbirds.
We
sampled
six
species
used
an
automated
radio-telemetry
system
area
subsequently
quantify
duration,
'bush-level'
activity
patterns
(~
0.1–30
m),
landscape
movements
30–6000
direction
time.
show
that
complement
activity,
acute
phase
protein
haptoglobin
were
prolonged
duration.
Complement
(i.e.,
lysis)
total
immunoglobulins
negatively
correlated
with
bush-level
patterns.
differences
partly
depended
on
whether
birds
or
short-distance
migrants.
Birds
infected
avian
malaria-like
parasites
showed
longer
during
than
uninfected
individuals,
double
departed
more
2.5
h
later
after
sunset/sunrise
suggesting
shorter
flight
bouts.
conclude
variation
baseline
infection
status
affects
helps
explain
individual
behaviour.
These
affect
overall
speed,
thus
can
have
significant
impact
induce
carry-over
effects
other
annual-cycle
stages.
Immune
should,
therefore,
be
considered
as
important
factors
when
applying
Movement Ecology,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
7(1)
Published: Aug. 11, 2019
Anthropogenic
changes
in
the
climate
and
environment
have
globally
affected
ecological
processes
such
that
spatiotemporal
occurrence
of
main
annual
cycle
events
(i.e.,
breeding,
wintering,
moulting,
migration)
has
shifted
migratory
birds.
Variation
arrival
timing
at
destinations
can
be
proximately
caused
by
an
altered
start
migration,
total
migration
distance,
and/or
speed
migration.
Quantifying
relative
contributions
these
causes
is
important
because
this
will
indicate
mechanisms
whereby
birds
could
potentially
adjust
their
response
to
global
change.
However,
we
relatively
little
quantitative
information
about
how
each
factors
contributes
variation
timing.
My
aims
are
estimate
correlated
with
distance
may
change
body
mass
a
comprehensive
analysis
including
multiple
species.For
purpose,
I
considered
individual
tracks
covering
complete
migrations
from
species
distinguished
between
within-
between-species
effects.Assuming
effects
quantified
under
approach
agree
acting
level,
starting
one
day
later
or
increasing
1000
km
would
result
0.4-0.8
days
2-5
days,
respectively.
The
generality
which
within
suggests
general
biological
mechanism
regulating
timing,
rather
than
distance.
was
positively
but
not
bird's
mass.As
endogenously
controlled
hatching
date,
directional
selection
probably
act
on
existing
within-species/within-population
alter
This
factor
importance
for
suggest
species/populations
there
sufficient
transgenerational
affect
corresponding
present
advantage
over
others
coping
anthropogenic-induced
changes.
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
9
Published: May 14, 2021
An
estimated
17%
of
migratory
bird
species
are
threatened
or
near
with
extinction.
This
represents
an
enormous
potential
loss
biodiversity
and
cost
to
human
societies
due
the
economic
benefits
that
birds
provide
through
ecosystem
services
ecotourism.
Conservation
presents
many
unique
challenges,
as
these
rely
on
multiple
geographically
distinct
habitats,
including
breeding
grounds,
non-breeding
stopover
sites
during
migration.
In
particular,
habitats
seldom
studied
relative
despite
their
importance
refueling
stations
for
birds.
this
study,
we
summarize
current
research
use
temporary
primary
crops
by
migration
assess
characteristics
agricultural
practices
most
often
associated
cropland
habitat.
First,
conducted
a
systematic
review
literature
document
effects
various
farming
crop
types
have
abundance
diversity
using
areas
stopovers.
Second,
analyzed
ecological
correlates
in
Northern
Hemisphere
predict
which
may
while
migrating.
We
ran
GLMM
test
whether
diet,
diet
breadth,
habitat,
habitat
realm
predicted
areas.
Our
suggests
particular
(principally
rice,
corn,
sunflower),
well
result
higher
non-cultivated
plant
diversity,
encourage
migrating
found
is
used
can
utilize
large
breadth
preferences
similar
structure
Journal of Animal Ecology,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
87(4), P. 1102 - 1115
Published: March 5, 2018
Abstract
Most
migratory
songbirds
travel
between
their
breeding
areas
and
wintering
grounds
through
a
series
of
nocturnal
flights.
The
timing
departures
defines
the
potential
flight
duration
thus
distance
covered
during
night.
Yet,
show
substantial
variation
in
departure
timing.
With
this
study,
we
aim
to
assess
whether
respective
challenges
migration
route,
namely
its
nature,
help
explain
variation.
At
stopover
site,
caught
Northern
Wheatears
(
Oenanthe
oenanthe
)
two
subspecies
that
differ
nature
onward
route
spring,
but
not
autumn.
We
determined
start
restlessness
short‐term
captivity,
radiotracked
after
release
both
seasons.
started
earlier
when
facing
long
remaining
an
extended
sea
barrier
spring.
Individual
directions
generally
affected
with
early
being
directed
towards
destination.
In
pattern
was
predominantly
found
birds
carrying
relatively
large
fuel
stores,
absent
lean
birds.
same
time,
short
no
strongly
reacted
stores
by
behaviour
(migratory
timing),
whereas
reaction
barrier.
These
results
suggest
basic
diel
schedule
birds’
activity
is
adapted
route.
Further,
they
adjust
behavioural
response,
behaviour,
relation
impending
challenges.
This
step
understanding
adjustments
songbirds.
it
emphasizes
importance
interpreting
ecological
context.