Medicinal Cannabis Formulations, Administration Routes and Dosing: Perspectives of Adults with Cancer DOI
Manan M. Nayak, Peter R. Chai, Stephanie Tung

et al.

Research Square (Research Square), Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Sept. 13, 2024

Abstract Introduction: One-of-three or -four adults with cancer turns to medicinal cannabis. Prior work suggests a disconnect between the clinical preferences of oncology teams and cannabis therapeutics practices patients. For instance, oncologists favor oral administration, while many patients combust vaporize. This investigation explored (MC) formulations, routes dosing among cancer. Methods: Semi-structured phone interviews across eight states consuming MC in compliance state law were conducted analyzed using applied thematic analysis. Results: Among study participants (N=24), mean age was 54 years. Sixty-seven percent female. Forty-six resided Eastern United States 51% described their as metastatic incurable. Across interviews, powerful theme myriad product formulations available through given dispensary storefront, triggering astonishment sometime feelings inundation. Common strategies purchase sample multiple store-bought well modify products at home, times alter intended administration reduce financial toxicity. A trusted, preferred not always consistently available. Although top-cited mode, wide array consumption methods included topical, sublingual, vaporization, combustion, rectal suppository. Three-quarters alternated modes administration. Medicinal imprecision constituted another theme, thought be due lack quality assurance level measurement home. Discussion: This that preparations, vary dramatically individuals cancer; few commonalities use patterns, for instance reliance on tend rooted scientific evidence. These qualitative finding should interrogated quantitatively but indicate lay-facing educational programs pertaining setting cancer, higher degree standardization may warranted.

Language: Английский

Medicinal Cannabis Formulations, Administration Routes and Dosing: Perspectives of Adults with Cancer DOI
Manan M. Nayak, Peter R. Chai, Stephanie Tung

et al.

Research Square (Research Square), Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Sept. 13, 2024

Abstract Introduction: One-of-three or -four adults with cancer turns to medicinal cannabis. Prior work suggests a disconnect between the clinical preferences of oncology teams and cannabis therapeutics practices patients. For instance, oncologists favor oral administration, while many patients combust vaporize. This investigation explored (MC) formulations, routes dosing among cancer. Methods: Semi-structured phone interviews across eight states consuming MC in compliance state law were conducted analyzed using applied thematic analysis. Results: Among study participants (N=24), mean age was 54 years. Sixty-seven percent female. Forty-six resided Eastern United States 51% described their as metastatic incurable. Across interviews, powerful theme myriad product formulations available through given dispensary storefront, triggering astonishment sometime feelings inundation. Common strategies purchase sample multiple store-bought well modify products at home, times alter intended administration reduce financial toxicity. A trusted, preferred not always consistently available. Although top-cited mode, wide array consumption methods included topical, sublingual, vaporization, combustion, rectal suppository. Three-quarters alternated modes administration. Medicinal imprecision constituted another theme, thought be due lack quality assurance level measurement home. Discussion: This that preparations, vary dramatically individuals cancer; few commonalities use patterns, for instance reliance on tend rooted scientific evidence. These qualitative finding should interrogated quantitatively but indicate lay-facing educational programs pertaining setting cancer, higher degree standardization may warranted.

Language: Английский

Citations

0