2021 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC),
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 1 - 3
Published: Nov. 5, 2022
In
this
study,
we
performed
two
experiments
to
explore
radiomic
features
and
multi-modality
medical
image
fusion
(IF).
the
first
experiment,
investigated
performance
of
multiple
IF
algorithms
for
reflecting
from
both
PET
CT
modalities
in
a
single
scan.
second
if
can
serve
as
an
objective
quality
assessment
(QA)
metric.
Experiments
were
on
PET/CT
images
328
histologically
proven
head
neck
tumors
segmented
by
experienced
radiologist.
The
iterative
metal
artifact
reduction
(iMAR)
algorithm
was
applied
images,
their
Hounsfield
Unit
range
clipped
[-500,500],
then
all
resized
isotropic
voxel
size
1
×
mm3,
quantized
normalized
integer
values
[0,
255].
To
have
comprehensive
analysis,
fused
using
11
different
covering
almost
categories,
13
metrics
categories
calculated
each
fusion.
Ninety-four
textural
extracted
regarding
Image
Biomarker
Standardization
Initiative
(IBSI)
guidelines.
For
Spearman
correlation
feature
between
its
fused-set
CT-
PET-sets,
coefficients
higher
than
0.7
considered
significant.
A
"preserved"
it
correlated
with
peer
sets.
QA
significant
0.7.
Among
methods
GFF
(guided
filtering
fusion)
FPDE
(fourth-order
partial
differential
equation)
had
best
results
conserving
22
19
features,
respectively,
showing
ability
reflect
maximum
information
GLCM
least
preserved
across
fusions.
Several
Radiomic
showed
peak
signal-to-noise
ratio
(PSNR)
root
mean
square
error
(RMSE)
metric
methods,
while
no
entropy
(EN),
SSIM
(structural
similarity
index
measure),
AG
(average
gradient),
EI
(edge
intensity),
SD
(standard
deviation),
SF
(spatial
frequency),
Qcv
(Chen-Varshney
metric).
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
22(8), P. 367 - 378
Published: July 13, 2024
Introduction
Myocardial
perfusion
imaging
(MPI)
is
one
of
the
most
commonly
ordered
cardiac
tests.
Accurate
motion
correction,
image
registration,
and
reconstruction
critical
for
high-quality
imaging,
but
this
can
be
technically
challenging
traditionally
has
relied
on
expert
manual
processing.
With
accurate
processing,
there
a
rich
variety
clinical,
stress,
functional,
anatomic
data
that
integrated
to
guide
patient
management.
2021 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC),
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 1 - 3
Published: Nov. 5, 2022
Glioblastoma
multiforme
(GBM)
is
regarded
as
the
most
prevalent
primary
tumor
of
central
nervous
system
in
brain.
However,
due
to
lack
information,
it
too
hard
understand
underlying
progression
patterns
and
prognosis
patients.
In
this
study,
we
evaluated
overall
survival
predictive
(time
event
analysis)
power
radiomic
features
extracted
from
MRI,
along
with
help
feature
selection
(FS)
machine
learning
(ML)
algorithms.
The
MR
images
119
patients
their
status
were
obtained.
data
randomly
split
into
70%
30%,
indicating
training
testing
datasets,
respectively.
Twelve
preprocessing
methods
(e.g.,
bin
discretization,
Laplacian
Gaussian,
wavelet
transform),
5
FS
Boruta,
Cindex,
Random
Survival
Forest),
7
ML
Glmnet,
CoxBoost)
algorithms
recruited
form
a
total
420
models.
models
C-index
method
showed
more
decent
results
than
others.
highest-achieving
model
(C-index
=
0.72)
was
combination
LOG
sigma
1
mm
preprocessing,
selector,
Coxph
algorithm.
Our
findings
represent
be
utilized
prediction
glioblastoma
prognostication
general.
2021 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC),
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 1 - 4
Published: Nov. 5, 2022
Heart
disease
is
one
of
the
leading
causes
death
worldwide.
Among
various
methods
used
to
assess
heart
function,
MPI
SPECT
method
a
valuable
and
non-invasive
that
brings
high-quality
images
with
low
radiation
exposure.
Radiomics
has
been
developed
extract
quantitative
features
from
medical
images.
These
can
be
predict
diagnosis
treatment
in
science.
To
use
these
clinic,
they
need
reliable;
other
words,
repeatable
reproducible.
Various
factors,
including
different
reconstructions,
affect
repeatability
reproducibility
radiomic
features.
Twenty
patients
who
underwent
stress
rest
were
this
study.
As
result,
40
existing
reconstructed
15
modes.
Finally,
600
unique
reconstructions
obtained,
segmentation
process
was
conducted
using
3D-Slicer
program.
Feature
extraction
done
LIFEx,
finally,
coefficient
variance
(COV)
check
reproducibility.
The
most
robust
FO_Kurtosis,
GLCM_Entropy_log10,
GLCM_Entropy_log2,
GLRLM_SRE,
GLRLM_LRE,
GLRLM_RP,
GLZLM_SZE,
GLZLM_HGZE.
change
order
reconstruction
parameter
only
case
caused
least
feature
variation.
This
study
planned
reliability
over
changes
parameters.
2021 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC),
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 1 - 3
Published: Nov. 5, 2022
A
body
of
literature
has
reported
the
promising
performance
deep
learning
models
when
applied
to
mammograms
for
different
clinical
tasks.
However,
a
major
pitfall
is
they
are
bearing
high-density
breasts
since
overlapping
high-dense
tissue
can
cover
lesion
and
make
diagnosing
interpreting
it
difficult.
Thus,
analysis
dedicated
trained
low-
be
great
importance.
In
this
study,
we
aimed
develop
deep-learning
classifying
breast
masses
on
into
benign
malignant
cases.
Curated
Breast
Imaging
Subset
Digital
Database
Screening
Mammography
(CBIS-DDSM)
dataset,
including
mammograms,
cropped
masses,
pathologic
diagnoses,
were
adopted
study.
For
models,
dataset
was
split
low-(BI-RADS
density1
2)
(BI-RADS
density3
4)
groups.
Contrast-limited
adaptive
histogram
equalization
(CLAHE)
enhance
contrast
images,
then
all
images
resized
255
×
matrix
size
normalized.
modified
DenseNet-201
neural
network
with
rate
starting
at
0.0001
decreased
in
piecewise
manner
every
epoch
RMSProp
optimizer.
Fifteen
percent
training
data
excluded
validation,
continued
100
epochs.
Data
augmentation,
rotation,
flipping,
scaling,
implemented
prevent
overfitting.
The
model
evaluated
using
test
set.
Accuracy
(ACC),
area
under
receiver
operating
characteristic
curve
(AUC),
sensitivity
(SEN),
specificity
(SPE)
general
0.720,
0.771,
0.732,
0.701,
Low-density
0.788,
0.818,
0.824,
0.742,
High-density
0.712,
0.621,
0.962,
0.180,
respectively.
Our
study
highlights
importance
developing
tailored
nature
improve
overall
accuracy.
We
also
suggest
performing
specific
preprocessing
breasts,
such
as
region-wise
enhancement
regions
high-intensity
values
(with
gamma
filter,
etc.).
2021 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC),
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 1 - 3
Published: Nov. 5, 2022
In
this
study,
we
performed
two
experiments
to
explore
radiomic
features
and
multi-modality
medical
image
fusion
(IF).
the
first
experiment,
investigated
performance
of
multiple
IF
algorithms
for
reflecting
from
both
PET
CT
modalities
in
a
single
scan.
second
if
can
serve
as
an
objective
quality
assessment
(QA)
metric.
Experiments
were
on
PET/CT
images
328
histologically
proven
head
neck
tumors
segmented
by
experienced
radiologist.
The
iterative
metal
artifact
reduction
(iMAR)
algorithm
was
applied
images,
their
Hounsfield
Unit
range
clipped
[-500,500],
then
all
resized
isotropic
voxel
size
1
×
mm3,
quantized
normalized
integer
values
[0,
255].
To
have
comprehensive
analysis,
fused
using
11
different
covering
almost
categories,
13
metrics
categories
calculated
each
fusion.
Ninety-four
textural
extracted
regarding
Image
Biomarker
Standardization
Initiative
(IBSI)
guidelines.
For
Spearman
correlation
feature
between
its
fused-set
CT-
PET-sets,
coefficients
higher
than
0.7
considered
significant.
A
"preserved"
it
correlated
with
peer
sets.
QA
significant
0.7.
Among
methods
GFF
(guided
filtering
fusion)
FPDE
(fourth-order
partial
differential
equation)
had
best
results
conserving
22
19
features,
respectively,
showing
ability
reflect
maximum
information
GLCM
least
preserved
across
fusions.
Several
Radiomic
showed
peak
signal-to-noise
ratio
(PSNR)
root
mean
square
error
(RMSE)
metric
methods,
while
no
entropy
(EN),
SSIM
(structural
similarity
index
measure),
AG
(average
gradient),
EI
(edge
intensity),
SD
(standard
deviation),
SF
(spatial
frequency),
Qcv
(Chen-Varshney
metric).