Synthese,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
202(3)
Published: Sept. 8, 2023
Abstract
In
recent
years,
so-called
organizational
accounts
(OA)
have
emerged
in
theoretical
biology
as
a
powerful,
viable
strategy
for
naturalizing
teleology
and
normativity.
the
wake
of
tradition
autopoiesis
biological
autonomy,
OA
notably
propose
new
meaning
notion
“organization,”
which
they
claim
to
be
capable,
among
other
things,
grounding
objective
observer-independent
normative
teleological
ascriptions.
this
paper,
I
focus
on
last
claim,
asking
“How
are
‘organization’
‘normativity’
conceptually
connected?”
The
basic
insight
mobilized
by
framework
answer
question
is
most
often
expressed
counterfactual
argument
regarding
“conditions
existence”
organized
entities.
show
that
careful
scrutiny
core
reveals
substantial
shortcoming.
To
make
point,
first
analyze
how
positions
idea
via
notions
“dependence”,
“constraint,”
“closure.”
Second,
consider
various
possible
interpretations
norms.
conclude
implications
do
not
enable
deliver
what
promise,
i.e.,
straightforward
link
between
organization
argue
different
needed
capture
intuition
about
normativitiy
suggest
stipulative
route
might
better
suitable
end.
Synthese,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
205(2)
Published: Jan. 16, 2025
Abstract
The
life
sciences
have
evoked
long-standing
philosophical
debates
on
a
system
view
of
versus
reductionist
that
reduces
the
complexity
life-forms
to
parts-based
entities
can
be
described
purely
mechanistically.
This
paper
examines
how
current
scientific
advances
in
contribute
an
anti-reductionist
concept
life.
It
does
so
by
looking
at
synthetic
biology,
discipline
within
has
ambiguous
relationship
this
debate.
While
field’s
engineering
approach
could
considered
manifestation
life,
it
also
builds
more
holistic,
systems
analyses
recent
practices
taking
place
biology
seem
challenge
After
analyzing
main
accounts
I
ask
support
these
considering
living
as
processual,
collaborative,
and
cognitive,
nonlife
gradual
scale.
empirically
informed
contributes
literature
drawing
observations
about
connecting
following:
sciences,
different
metaphysical
stances
philosophy
emerging
biology.
concludes
views
Adaptive Behavior,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
30(5), P. 389 - 407
Published: Jan. 27, 2022
Living
organisms
act
as
integrated
wholes
to
maintain
themselves.
Individual
actions
can
each
be
explained
by
characterizing
the
mechanisms
that
perform
activity.
But
these
alone
do
not
explain
how
various
activities
are
coordinated
and
performed
versatilely.
We
argue
this
depends
on
a
specific
type
of
mechanism,
control
mechanism.
develop
an
account
examining
several
extensively
studied
operative
in
bacterium
E.
coli.
On
our
analysis,
what
distinguishes
mechanism
from
other
is
it
relies
measuring
one
or
more
variables,
which
results
setting
constraints
determine
its
action
flexible
mechanisms.
In
most
basic
arrangement,
measurement
process
directly
determines
but
complex
arrangements
signals
mediate
between
measurements
effectors.
This
opens
possibility
multiple
responses
same
based
measurements.
It
also
allows
crosstalk,
resulting
networks
Such
integrate
behaviors
organism
present
challenge
tailoring
particular
discuss
activity
still
result
differential,
versatile,
.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
93, P. 96 - 106
Published: March 30, 2022
Organization
figures
centrally
in
the
understanding
of
biological
systems
advanced
by
both
new
mechanists
and
proponents
autonomy
framework.
The
focus
on
how
components
mechanisms
are
organized
to
produce
a
phenomenon
emphasize
productive
continuity
between
these
components.
framework
focuses
system
such
way
that
they
contribute
maintenance
organisms
them.
In
this
paper
we
analyze
compare
two
accounts
organization
argue
as
cohesively
integrated
benefits
from
insights
both.
To
bring
together
accounts,
notions
control
regulation
bridge
concepts.
We
start
characterization
terms
constraints
specific
type
mechanism,
mechanisms,
operate
other
basis
measurements
variables
its
environment.
Control
characterized
their
own
set
enable
them
sense
conditions,
convey
signals,
effect
changes
controlled
mechanism.
They
thereby
allow
living
adapt
internal
external
variations
coordinate
parts
manner
maintain
viability.
Because
contain
vast
number
central
challenge
is
understand
themselves
organized.
With
support
examples
unicellular
multicellular
heterarchically,
discuss
architecture
can,
without
invoking
top-down
centralized
forms
organizations,
succeed
coordinating
activities
organisms.
Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
36(3), P. 355 - 368
Published: May 2, 2024
Abstract
This
essay
argues
for
the
importance
of
an
organismic
perspective
in
plant
biology
and
considers
some
its
implications.
These
include
increased
attention
to
plant-environment
interaction
emphasis
on
integrated
approaches.
Furthermore,
this
contextualizes
concept
organism
recent
years
places
a
longer
history.
Recent
developments
worsening
environmental
crises
have
led
researchers
study
responses
changing
environments
with
whole
approaches
that
situate
plants
their
environments,
emphasizing
intricate
dynamic
between
them.
renewed
recalls
debates
early
twentieth
century,
when
organicism
was
one
three
main
frameworks
(along
vitalism
mechanism).
Some
scholars
see
today
as
“return”
earlier
period.
including
insights
from
will
benefit
philosophy
research
examines
now
periods.
A
comprehensive
account
should
involve
botanical
conception
well
zoological
(which
is
more
frequently
considered).
Although
does
not
aim
present
conceptual
analysis,
it
presents
examples
how
can
be
useful
understanding
concepts
(such
phenotype,
stress,
etc.)
processes
experiment
set-ups,
data
processes,
biology.
Philosophy
investigations
at
greatly
examinations
cases
biology,
both
past.
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: April 1, 2025
Abstract
Explanatory
Particularism
presents
an
alternative
approach
to
studying
explanation
across
the
sciences.
On
this
view,
explanations
are
local,
context-dependent
achievements
of
particular
scientific
communities,
reflecting
latter’s
epistemic
values,
images
understanding,
and
other
contextual
features.
Values
associated
with
understanding
vary
widely
within
communities
over
time.
The
particularist
has
implications
for
theories
social
action
collaboration,
interdisciplinary
research
in
practice.
Results
include
practical
guidelines
“low-effort
interdisciplinarity,”
aspects
collaborative
norms
that
complement
more
traditional
empiricism.
account
is
illustrated
detailed
case
studies
COVID-19
immunology
vaccines,
systems
models
vs.
lab-based
approaches,
complexes
model-based
among
life
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 121 - 152
Published: April 1, 2025
Abstract
This
chapter
applies
the
explanatory
particularist
account
from
Part
I
to
an
important
class
of
cases
in
scientific
practice:
interdisciplinary
research.
first
survey
background
for
this
application:
empirical
and
philosophical
studies
interdisciplinarity
(Section
4.1).
Next,
argue
that
ideas
comport
well
with
key
results
literature,
offer
several
new
insights
4.2).
Section
4.3
goes
deeper
applying
I’s
framework,
focusing
on
EPM
taxonomy
model–model
relations
Chapter
2.
use
latter
classify
research
projects
relevant
explanation/understanding,
setting
up
a
challenge
explanation
(IDE)
my
response.
application
shows
role
explanation/understanding
research,
some
apparent
objections
EP
are
actually
advantages.
Features
practice
seem
incompatible
particularism
fact
support
view.
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 322 - 332
Published: April 1, 2025
Abstract
This
short
concluding
chapter
summarizes
the
book’s
argument
and
key
results.
Three
themes
are
throughlines
for
entire
book:
explanation
as
collaborative
process
product,
diversity
epistemic
resource,
engaging
scientific
practice.
Philosophical
study
of
guided
by
those
three
departs
from
tradition,
but
rejects
only
monist
assumptions—not
other
theories
explanation.
Instead,
repurposed
resources
particularist
studies,
illustrated
in
Chapters
7–8.
reviews
overall
goals
judges
them
to
have
been
met:
exploring
idea
that
is
a
form
activity;
showing
benefits
diverse
specialized
explanations;
reconfiguring
relation
between
philosophical
theory
I
then
summarize
results
Parts
II
(see
earlier
summaries).
The
concludes
with
an
open-ended
list
cases
future
work
using
EP’s
framework
insights.
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 81 - 118
Published: April 1, 2025
Abstract
This
chapter
develops
the
second
part
of
my
philosophical
framework
for
analyzing
particularist
explanations.
The
basic
idea
is
that
constructing
a
scientific
explanation
collaborative
activity.
I
use
resources
from
social
action
theory
to
explicate
this
idea.
first
presents
basics
philosophy
with
detailed
example
(Section
3.1)
and
survey
major
theories
3.2).
Building
on
latter,
propose
an
original
account
activity,
which
implies
norms
participants’
attitudes
3.3).
Applied
case
explanatory
model-construction
in
epistemic
community,
yields
general
EP-explanation.
Section
3.4
examines
normative
grounds
account,
setting
stage
Part
II.
final
section
integrates
activity
Chapter
2,
yielding
full
particularism
3.5).
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 194 - 240
Published: April 1, 2025
Abstract
This
chapter
builds
on
the
results
of
Chapter
5.
Minimal
coherence
requirements
for
bridging
models
entail
that
main
obstacle
to
IDE
is
scientists’
own
attitudes.
Section
6.1
addresses
this
obstacle,
offering
detailed
guidelines
making
explicit
and
fostering
relations.
These
operationalize
modeling
framework
social
action
norms
from
Part
I.
Following
them
encourages
scientists
engaged
in
IDR
adopt
collaborative
attitudes
toward
explanation.
could
be
fruitfully
applied
current
projects.
6.2
examines
epistemic
benefits
broader
normative
significance
IDE,
focusing
understanding.
yields
a
particularist
account
an
important
aspect
scientific
understanding,
building
earlier
sections
book.
Other
implications
build
ideal
patchwork
unity
science
6.3
puts
new,
understanding
conversation
with
other
philosophical
accounts
same.
6.4
concludes,
summarizing
key
II.