Exploring Technological Pedagogical Readiness (TPR) in China’s primary mathematics teachers: TPR scale validation DOI Open Access
Mao Li, Colleen Vale, Hazel Tan

et al.

Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 20(7), P. em2469 - em2469

Published: June 14, 2024

This study presents the Technological Pedagogical Readiness (TPR) scale, which aims to assess Chinese primary mathematics teachers’ readiness integrate technology in education China. Based on Content Knowledge (TPACK) and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) frameworks, TPR scale incorporates factors such as contextual influences, professional development, community involvement. Through an online survey involving 554 teachers, utilizes exploratory confirmatory factor analyses create establish scale’s validity reliability, revealing strong loadings across its constructs. analysis emphasizes effectiveness capturing complexities of integration educational settings. The research underscores importance considering internal teacher like TPACK external institutional support achieve successful integration. Although focus is development validation, application provides valuable insights for developing comprehensive strategies that address individual broader system competencies. study’s findings suggest has wide-ranging applicability, making significant contributions global discourse serving a resource future research, policy-making, practice enhancing diverse contexts.

Language: Английский

On the Technology Acceptance Behavior of Romanian Preschool Teachers DOI Creative Commons
Dana Rad,

Anca Egerău,

Alina Felicia Roman

et al.

Behavioral Sciences, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 13(2), P. 133 - 133

Published: Feb. 5, 2023

This study investigates how compatibility and perceived enjoyment affect the link between intention to use actual technology in Romanian preschool education, building on earlier studies.300 participants were invited participate this research from 15 counties. 182 teachers' questionnaires utilized for data analysis after return screening of responses. A valid accurate scale evaluating behavior towards adoption was included questionnaire, along with self-reported demographic data, professional identification, other information. Data analyzed using SPSS V.16.(1) Intention use, compatibility, enjoyment, positively associated. (2) The effect carried out following way: → Compatibility Perceived Actual use. We hypothesize that affects and, lastly, For a more robust validation results, we have also modelled relationship Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural network.Compatibility partially mediate class by teachers. According theory planned behavior, brought light intricacy utilize classroom their usage it. Limitations implications are discussed.

Language: Английский

Citations

7

Higher education policy and management in the post-pandemic era DOI Open Access
Andy Nguyen, Lý Thị Trần, Bich-Hang Duong

et al.

Policy Futures in Education, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 21(4), P. 330 - 334

Published: March 17, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

7

A unified framework for understanding teachers’ adoption of robotics in STEM education DOI
Hüseyin Ateş, Cengiz GÜNDÜZALP

Education and Information Technologies, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 29(11), P. 1 - 27

Published: Dec. 15, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

7

Conocimiento técnico pedagógico del contenido (TPACK) en contextos rurales: Una revisión bibliográfica DOI Creative Commons
Miguel Paidicán, Pamela Alejandra Arredondo Herrera

Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 23(51), P. 128 - 152

Published: April 1, 2024

This literature review aimed to examine the scientific production of TPACK model in rural education contexts. Twenty-nine articles were selected from databases DIALNET, Google Scholar, REDALYC, Semantic Scholar and SciELO. The search period was start until May 2023. inclusion criteria only articles, open access, full text, social sciences, research developed It is concluded that publications contexts present a scarce development, with 3,83% analysed documents, whose publication took place composed by years 2013 Furthermore, all focused on teachers, self-report studies knowledge teaching experiences being most recurrent, 48,27% 41,32% respectively. recommended be addresses technological literacy training, through collaborative processes include various school stakeholders. In addition, TK, PK CK should included as priority, regardless subject matter addressed.

Language: Английский

Citations

2

Exploring Technological Pedagogical Readiness (TPR) in China’s primary mathematics teachers: TPR scale validation DOI Open Access
Mao Li, Colleen Vale, Hazel Tan

et al.

Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 20(7), P. em2469 - em2469

Published: June 14, 2024

This study presents the Technological Pedagogical Readiness (TPR) scale, which aims to assess Chinese primary mathematics teachers’ readiness integrate technology in education China. Based on Content Knowledge (TPACK) and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) frameworks, TPR scale incorporates factors such as contextual influences, professional development, community involvement. Through an online survey involving 554 teachers, utilizes exploratory confirmatory factor analyses create establish scale’s validity reliability, revealing strong loadings across its constructs. analysis emphasizes effectiveness capturing complexities of integration educational settings. The research underscores importance considering internal teacher like TPACK external institutional support achieve successful integration. Although focus is development validation, application provides valuable insights for developing comprehensive strategies that address individual broader system competencies. study’s findings suggest has wide-ranging applicability, making significant contributions global discourse serving a resource future research, policy-making, practice enhancing diverse contexts.

Language: Английский

Citations

2