Ethics and Information Technology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 26(2)
Published: May 10, 2024
Abstract It has been argued that our concepts can be disrupted or challenged by technology normative concerns, which raises the question of whether we create, design, engineer, define more robust avoid counterexamples and conceptual challenges lead to disruption. In this paper, it is can. This argument presented through a case study definition in technological domain.
Language: Английский
BMC Neuroscience, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 25(1)
Published: Aug. 29, 2024
The scientific relationship between neuroscience and artificial intelligence is generally acknowledged, the role that their long history of collaboration has played in advancing both fields often emphasized. Beyond important insights provided by collaborative development, AI raise a number ethical issues are explored neuroethics ethics. Neuroethics ethics have been gaining prominence last few decades, they typically carried out different research communities. However, considering evolving landscape AI-assisted neurotechnologies various conceptual practical intersections neuroscience-such as increasing application neuroscientific research, healthcare neurological mental diseases, use knowledge inspiration for AI-some scholars now calling these two domains. This article seeks to explore how can stimulate theoretical and, ideally, governance efforts. First, we offer some reasons reflection on innovations AI. Next, dimensions think could be enhanced cross-fertilization subfields We believe pace fusion development innovations, broad underspecified calls responsibility do not consider from will only partially successful promoting meaningful changes applications.
Language: Английский
Citations
8
Synthese, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 205(3)
Published: Feb. 21, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Jan. 27, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0
Oxford University Press eBooks, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: March 19, 2025
Abstract The new avatars and bots modeled after humans, the large language models (LLMs) with a “persona,” seemingly autonomously acting robots raise question of whether AI technologies can also possess personhood or at least be part our personhood. Do we extend through living death in digital realm? This article explores application moral concept to technologies. It presents twofold thesis: first, it illustrates, various examples, how is being disrupted context Second, discusses potential evolution argues for abandoning ethics, based on reasons such as its vagueness, harmful discriminatory character, disconnection from society. Finally, outlines future perspectives approaches moving forward, emphasizing need conceptual justice concepts.
Language: Английский
Citations
0
Oxford University Press eBooks, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: March 20, 2025
Abstract This article is a philosophical exploration of personhood for prosocial artificial intelligence (AI). Section 2 motivates thinking about AI by highlighting how technological advances like generative are deeply disruptive to core concepts personhood, using social robots illustrate. It proposes conceptually engineering better capture the ways we interact with AI, and draws on African philosophy ubuntu develop relational view personhood. The holds that count as persons if they engage humans in ways, such acting kindly, helpfully, generously, reliably. 3 considers replies practical objections assigning ‘personhood’ robots. objection stresses (currently) lack consciousness, which necessary being person. hold even could qualify person, it does not currently because has many antisocial effects, addicting people, reproducing implicit biases, violating privacy, deceiving users, reducing human connection. 4 concludes drawing insights from enabled us engineer concept characterize AI. However, fail at unless design deploy safeguard valued features life.
Language: Английский
Citations
0
Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 12(SI1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
The move from the traditional academic conference format to a loosely defined of unconference can be contentious and spark robust debate on conceptual disruption conferencing. As part HELTASA’s strategic plan re-structuring re-imagining its vision purpose, it initiated new way conferencing; participant-driven participant-focused. Through self-reflective written narratives, this paper explores three development practitioners' experiences in planning reflecting (un)conference. We share our accounts (un)conference as format, concepts, ways doing being. Qualitative data were collected narratives through collective descriptive autoethnography research design methodology. insights are applied Conceptual Disruption Framework which proposes tripartite framework for disruption, distinguishes disruptions occurring at levels (individual clusters schemes), taking two forms (conceptual gaps, conflicts), leading distinct severity (mild, moderate, severe). Using framework, we describe personal thoughts perspectives engaging with novel approach (un)conferencing. probe into potential collaborative reflection gain deeper understanding shift HELTASA explore discomfort, displacement, learnings intentional practices. This highlights shifting mindsets reflect interrogate framing analysis reveals that engagement (un)conferencing together concept event provided environment atmosphere where team appreciated brainstorming understandings, self-reflecting, exploring different perspectives. study provides empirical evidence strength collaboration, building community practice possibility being shape-shifter higher education. At an interpersonal level, process allowed us self-interrogate unpacking shaping own thinking. asserts (un)conference, involves is messy requires level trust, openness, adaptability amongst all members organising team.
Language: Английский
Citations
0
Ethics and Information Technology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 26(2)
Published: May 10, 2024
Abstract It has been argued that our concepts can be disrupted or challenged by technology normative concerns, which raises the question of whether we create, design, engineer, define more robust avoid counterexamples and conceptual challenges lead to disruption. In this paper, it is can. This argument presented through a case study definition in technological domain.
Language: Английский
Citations
0