
Environmental Science & Policy, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 160, P. 103833 - 103833
Published: Aug. 9, 2024
Language: Английский
Environmental Science & Policy, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 160, P. 103833 - 103833
Published: Aug. 9, 2024
Language: Английский
Elsevier eBooks, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
20Climate, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 13(1), P. 20 - 20
Published: Jan. 16, 2025
This study explores the nature and significance of a crucial form global environmental expertise: that which relates to conducting assessments with aim influencing decision-making. Drawing on theory expertise, conceptualizes expertise as social position defined by epistemic practice, this focuses in context challenges—particularly relating climate change IPCC—highlighting required address kind complex multifaceted issue. type allows for synthesis current state challenges, proposal options action, communication these findings decision-makers society at large. shapes knowledge is much broader than single disciplinary field, encompassing both ecological dynamics, development recommendations action. finds such embodies distinct practice four key characteristics distinguish it from more narrowly forms introduces term “mega-expertise” capture character expertise. concludes reflecting implications considering its relationship traditional, scientific
Language: Английский
Citations
2Frontiers in Climate, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 6
Published: Oct. 3, 2024
While there has been much discussion about what kind of expertise the IPCC needs to develop (better) guide climate policy, little said how experts themselves assess challenges making science policy-relevant. The paper aims address this gap by exploring leading reflect on and evaluate their work. empirical material consists an interview study with currently or recently involved in IPCC. selection strategy aimed achieve a broad range experience among those key roles assessment work, including from all three working groups, different regions, genders. Data interviews was analyzed thematically using NVivo. concept boundary work used analyze distinctions boundaries work; draw between policy-relevance policy-prescriptiveness, certain uncertain knowledge. By analyzing experts’ own experiences ideas makes relevant policy-making, contributes current future for
Language: Английский
Citations
5Environmental Science & Policy, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 160, P. 103833 - 103833
Published: Aug. 9, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
0