Navigating dilemmas with formalization of advisory processes: Views of practitioners in the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) DOI Creative Commons
Kåre Nolde Nielsen, Sebastian Linke,

Petter Holm

et al.

Environmental Science & Policy, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 160, P. 103833 - 103833

Published: Aug. 9, 2024

Language: Английский

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change DOI

Göran Sundqvist

Elsevier eBooks, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

20

Navigating Global Environmental Challenges: Disciplinarity, Transdisciplinarity, and the Emergence of Mega-Expertise DOI Open Access
Rolf Lidskog

Climate, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 13(1), P. 20 - 20

Published: Jan. 16, 2025

This study explores the nature and significance of a crucial form global environmental expertise: that which relates to conducting assessments with aim influencing decision-making. Drawing on theory expertise, conceptualizes expertise as social position defined by epistemic practice, this focuses in context challenges—particularly relating climate change IPCC—highlighting required address kind complex multifaceted issue. type allows for synthesis current state challenges, proposal options action, communication these findings decision-makers society at large. shapes knowledge is much broader than single disciplinary field, encompassing both ecological dynamics, development recommendations action. finds such embodies distinct practice four key characteristics distinguish it from more narrowly forms introduces term “mega-expertise” capture character expertise. concludes reflecting implications considering its relationship traditional, scientific

Language: Английский

Citations

2

Science for transformative change: the IPCC, boundary work and the making of useable knowledge DOI Creative Commons
Rolf Lidskog

Frontiers in Climate, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 6

Published: Oct. 3, 2024

While there has been much discussion about what kind of expertise the IPCC needs to develop (better) guide climate policy, little said how experts themselves assess challenges making science policy-relevant. The paper aims address this gap by exploring leading reflect on and evaluate their work. empirical material consists an interview study with currently or recently involved in IPCC. selection strategy aimed achieve a broad range experience among those key roles assessment work, including from all three working groups, different regions, genders. Data interviews was analyzed thematically using NVivo. concept boundary work used analyze distinctions boundaries work; draw between policy-relevance policy-prescriptiveness, certain uncertain knowledge. By analyzing experts’ own experiences ideas makes relevant policy-making, contributes current future for

Language: Английский

Citations

5

Navigating dilemmas with formalization of advisory processes: Views of practitioners in the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) DOI Creative Commons
Kåre Nolde Nielsen, Sebastian Linke,

Petter Holm

et al.

Environmental Science & Policy, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 160, P. 103833 - 103833

Published: Aug. 9, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

0