
Research Square (Research Square), Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Oct. 14, 2024
Language: Английский
Research Square (Research Square), Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Oct. 14, 2024
Language: Английский
Fuel, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 392, P. 134872 - 134872
Published: March 3, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
1Journal of Environmental Management, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 370, P. 122696 - 122696
Published: Sept. 30, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
4Heliyon, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 11(1), P. e41126 - e41126
Published: Dec. 13, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
3Green Energy and Environmental Technology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 4
Published: Feb. 28, 2025
As of 2023, coal, oil, and natural gas, which are non-renewable fossil fuels, account for about 80% the world’s energy consumption. This underscores pressing necessity alternative sources in light worsening climate crisis. Apart from problems, this review evaluates potential microbial fuel cells biofuel production, contributes to just 10–20% total consumption due its relatively low environmental impact. The aim systematic is elucidate their role producing a range bio-based including biogas, biodiesel, bioethanol, biobutanol. findings categorized into ten main areas: biomass conversion techniques, substrates strains, design components cells, strain improvement through metabolic engineering, enhancements nanomaterials advantages disadvantages biofuels, integration biorefineries, applications, challenges limitations, future trends cell technology. also promise as sustainable eco-friendly option bioenergy emphasizing need advancements efficiency compete with conventional fuels. Harnessing innovative strategies pertaining technology (MFCs) can potentially transform generation more commercially viable practice, positively impacting conservation public health.
Language: Английский
Citations
0Biochemical Engineering Journal, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 109705 - 109705
Published: March 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
03 Biotech, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 15(6)
Published: May 16, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0Next Energy, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 8, P. 100311 - 100311
Published: May 23, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0Materials, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 17(6), P. 1286 - 1286
Published: March 11, 2024
The usage time of air-cathode microbial fuel cells (MFCs) is significantly influenced by the moisture content within proton exchange membrane (PEM). Therefore, enhancing water retention capability PEM applying a hydrophobic polymer coating to its surface has extended PEM’s three times and increased MFCs’ operational duration 66%. Moreover, nature reduces contamination on prevents anode liquid from permeating into air cathode. Towards end MFC operation, internal resistance reduced 45%. effectively maintained oxygen reduction reaction activity in coating’s ability restrict transmembrane diffusion demonstrated experimental data showing significant decrease coefficient due presence. degradation efficiency chemical demand 16% 35% factor one.
Language: Английский
Citations
2Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 192, P. 155 - 176
Published: Aug. 25, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
2Water Environment Research, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 96(9)
Published: Sept. 1, 2024
Abstract Microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) is gaining importance not only for effectively treating wastewater but also producing hydrogen. The up‐flow microbial (UPMEC) an innovative approach to enhance the efficiency, and substrate degradation. In this study, a baffled UPMEC with anode divided into three regions by inserting baffle (sieve) plates at varying distances from cathode was designed. effect of process parameters, such as flow rate (10, 15, 20 mL/min), electrode area (50, 100, 150 cm 2 ), catholyte buffer concentration mM) were investigated using distillery substrate. experimental results showed maximum 0.6837 ± 0.02 mmol/L biohydrogen mM buffer, 49 1.0% COD reduction . current density 1335.94 mA/m 15 mL/min surface that optimized concentration, hydrogen production effective treatment achieved in UPMEC. Practitioner Points Biohydrogen Flowrate, areas significantly influenced production. Maximum (0.6837±0.02mmol/L.day) (49±1.0%) mL/min. Highest CHR 95.37±1.9 % OHR 4.6±0.09 observed concentration.
Language: Английский
Citations
1