Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 263, P. 108701 - 108701
Published: March 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 263, P. 108701 - 108701
Published: March 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 21(6), P. 428 - 448
Published: April 19, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
20European Radiology Experimental, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 8(1)
Published: May 14, 2024
Overall quality of radiomics research has been reported as low in literature, which constitutes a major challenge to improve. Consistent, transparent, and accurate reporting is critical, can be accomplished with systematic use guidelines. The CheckList for EvaluAtion Radiomics (CLEAR) was previously developed assist authors their radiomic reviewers evaluation. To take full advantage CLEAR, further explanation elaboration each item, well literature examples, may useful. main goal this work, Explanation Elaboration Examples CLEAR (CLEAR-E3), improve CLEAR's usability dissemination. In international collaborative effort, members the European Society Medical Imaging Informatics-Radiomics Auditing Group searched identify representative examples item. At least two demonstrating optimal reporting, were presented All selected from open-access articles, allowing users easily consult corresponding full-text articles. addition these, item's expanded elaborated. For easier access, resulting document available at https://radiomic.github.io/CLEAR-E3/ . As complementary effort we anticipate that initiative will greater ease transparency, editors reviewing manuscripts.Relevance statement Along original checklist, CLEAR-E3 expected provide more in-depth understanding items, concrete evaluating research.Key points• aims research, manuscripts.• Based on positive by EuSoMII Group, item elaborated CLEAR-E3.• accessed
Language: Английский
Citations
16European Radiology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Jan. 9, 2025
Abstract Objectives To investigate how studies determine the sample size when developing radiomics prediction models for binary outcomes, and whether meets estimates obtained by using established criteria. Methods We identified that were published from 01 January 2023 to 31 December in seven leading peer-reviewed radiological journals. reviewed justification methods, actual used. calculated compared used three criteria proposed Riley et al. investigated which characteristics factors associated with sufficient Results included 116 studies. Eleven out of one hundred sixteen justified size, 6/11 performed a priori calculation. The median (first third quartile, Q1, Q3) total is 223 (130, 463), those training are 150 (90, 288). (Q1, difference between minimum according −100 (−216, 183), differences more restrictive approach based on −268 (−427, −157). presence external testing specialty topic size. Conclusion Radiomics often designed without justification, whose may be too small avoid overfitting. Sample encouraged model. Key Points Question critical help minimize overfitting model, but overlooked underpowered research . Findings Few justified, calculated, or reported their most them did not meet recent formal Clinical relevance justification. Consequently, many It should justify, perform, report considerations
Language: Английский
Citations
2La radiologia medica, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 127(7), P. 763 - 772
Published: June 2, 2022
Language: Английский
Citations
49Clinical Imaging, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 103, P. 109993 - 109993
Published: Oct. 6, 2023
Language: Английский
Citations
28European Journal of Radiology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 184, P. 111956 - 111956
Published: Jan. 29, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
1La radiologia medica, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 128(6), P. 655 - 667
Published: May 10, 2023
Language: Английский
Citations
20Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 22(4), P. 401 - 414
Published: Jan. 1, 2023
Due primarily to the excellent soft tissue contrast depictions provided by MRI, widespread application of head and neck MRI in clinical practice serves assess various diseases. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based methodologies, particularly deep learning analyses using convolutional neural networks, have recently gained global recognition been extensively investigated research for their applicability across a range categories within medical imaging, including MRI. Analytical approaches AI shown potential addressing limitations associated with In this review, we focus on technical advancements deep-learning-based methodologies utility field encompassing aspects such as image acquisition reconstruction, lesion segmentation, disease classification diagnosis, prognostic prediction patients presenting We then discuss current offer insights regarding future challenges field.
Language: Английский
Citations
17European Radiology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Sept. 6, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
8European Journal of Radiology, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 167, P. 111086 - 111086
Published: Sept. 6, 2023
Language: Английский
Citations
16