Neuromodulation and memory: exploring ethical ramifications in memory modification treatment via implantable neurotechnologies DOI Creative Commons
Claudia González-Márquez

Frontiers in Psychology, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 14

Published: Dec. 21, 2023

Invasive implantable neurotechnologies capable of simultaneously altering and recording neural activity are no longer the exclusive province science fiction but a looming reality that will revolutionize medical practice. These advancements, particularly in their memory-altering capabilities, herald vast array opportunities for addressing complex landscape neurodegenerative psychiatric conditions linked to memory impairments. However, panoply ethical implications arising from such novel neurotechnology remains relatively unexplored by neuroethics literature. This study examines contrasts potential modification treatment via neurotechnologies. The contends undesired side effects resulting modulation can lead significant identity harms, disrupting coherence self-narratives impinging on our authenticity. To evince practical impact this moral argument, conducts assessment how employing modulate may jeopardize (i) responsiveness events core system values (ii) emotional component associated with altered memory. From first-person standpoint, changes way we reasonably feel react past future intentions be deemed ethically problematic as these profound yield disruptions negatively personal lives interpersonal relationships. In addition, discusses further conundrums third-person perspective inhibit social activism against structural injustices, thereby hindering societal progress. Thus, taking into account dimension is paramount when evaluating permissibility procedures.

Language: Английский

What an International Declaration on Neurotechnologies and Human Rights Could Look like: Ideas, Suggestions, Desiderata DOI Creative Commons
Christoph Bublitz

AJOB Neuroscience, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 15(2), P. 96 - 112

Published: Nov. 3, 2023

International institutions such as UNESCO are deliberating on a new standard setting instrument for neurotechnologies. This will likely lead to the adoption of soft law document which be first global specifically tailored neurotechnologies, tone further international or domestic regulations. While some stakeholders have been consulted, these developments so far evaded broader attention neuroscience, neurotech, and neuroethics communities. To initiate debate, this target article puts discussion twenty-five considerations desiderata recognition by future instrument. They formulated at different levels abstraction, from big picture technical details, seek widen perspective preparatory reports transcend narrow debate about "neurorights" overshadows many richer more relevant aspects. These not an exhaustive enumeration but starting point discussions what deserves requires protection

Language: Английский

Citations

15
What’s special about ‘not feeling like oneself’? A deflationary account of self(-illness) ambiguity DOI
Roy Dings,

Léon C. de Bruin

Philosophical Explorations, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 25(3), P. 269 - 289

Published: March 22, 2022

The article provides a conceptualization of self(-illness) ambiguity and investigates to what extent is 'special'. First, we draw on empirical findings argue that self-ambiguity ubiquitous phenomenon. We suggest these are best explained by multidimensional account, according which selves consist various dimensions mutually affect each other. On such an any change particular self-aspect may other self-aspects thereby alter the overall structural pattern self-aspects, potentially leading self-ambiguity. Second, propose comes in degrees should be understood as spectrum (as opposed there being qualitative differences among instances self-ambiguity). Third, complexity most useful dimension organize cases self-ambiguity, with mundane one end self-illness spectrum. Fourth, address promises perils narrativity regard Finally, link our deflationary account theories self.

Language: Английский

Citations

14
What Happens After a Neural Implant Study? Neuroethics Expert Workshop on Post-Trial Obligations DOI
Ishan Dasgupta, Eran Klein, Laura Y. Cabrera

et al.

Neuroethics, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 17(2)

Published: April 29, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

2
What is an Identity Crisis? DOI Creative Commons
Nada Gligorov

Journal of Consciousness Studies, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 30(3), P. 34 - 58

Published: March 31, 2023

The use of brain technology that contributes to psychological changes has spurred a debate about personal identity. Some argue neurotechnology does not undermine continuity (Levy, 2011) while others it (Kreitmair, 2019; Schechtman, 2010). To make these assessments, commentators fail identify cause discontinuity. In this paper, I present view identifies with the maintenance self-concept. concept self requires ability self-ascribe physical and features diachronic emerges self-ascriptions require endurance over time. maintain an adequate depend on any particular combination can be maintained despite even significant in or traits. Finally, apply self-concept result discontinuity self.

Language: Английский

Citations

5
Self-implant ambiguity? Understanding self-related changes in deep brain stimulation DOI
Robyn Bluhm, Laura Y. Cabrera

Philosophical Explorations, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 25(3), P. 367 - 385

Published: April 27, 2022

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) uses electrodes implanted in the to modulate dysregulated activity related a variety of neurological and psychiatric conditions. A number people who use DBS have reported changes that affect their sense self. In neuroethics literature, there has been significant debate over exact nature these changes. More recently, suggestions this is overblown detracts from clinically-relevant ways understanding effects DBS. paper, we offer an alternative approach on self, drawing John Sadler's work self-illness ambiguity. We argue ambiguity complex concept, with at least three different aspects, each aspects identify also characterizes one kind DBS-related change. Our analysis suggests helping patients adjust life as user.

Language: Английский

Citations

4
Aiming at Well-Being with Brain Implants: Any Risk of Implanting Unprecedented Vulnerabilities? DOI
Tomislav Furlanis, Frédéric Gilbert

Philosophy and medicine, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 181 - 197

Published: Jan. 1, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

1
Personhood, Self-Consciousness, and the First-Person Perspective DOI
Tony Cheng,

Amit Anurag,

Markus Herrmann

et al.

Brill | mentis eBooks, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: April 2, 2023

Self-consciousness, first-person reference, and personal identity are linked fields of research. The book contains contributions from international researchers about topics like pre-reflective reflexive consciousness, embodiment, temporality, self-location, the practical implications identity. Among contributors Amit Anurag, Irene Breuer, Tony Cheng, Heidi Haanila, Markus Herrmann, Muriel Leuenberger, Maik Niemeck Jörg Noller.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Neuromodulation and memory: exploring ethical ramifications in memory modification treatment via implantable neurotechnologies DOI Creative Commons
Claudia González-Márquez

Frontiers in Psychology, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 14

Published: Dec. 21, 2023

Invasive implantable neurotechnologies capable of simultaneously altering and recording neural activity are no longer the exclusive province science fiction but a looming reality that will revolutionize medical practice. These advancements, particularly in their memory-altering capabilities, herald vast array opportunities for addressing complex landscape neurodegenerative psychiatric conditions linked to memory impairments. However, panoply ethical implications arising from such novel neurotechnology remains relatively unexplored by neuroethics literature. This study examines contrasts potential modification treatment via neurotechnologies. The contends undesired side effects resulting modulation can lead significant identity harms, disrupting coherence self-narratives impinging on our authenticity. To evince practical impact this moral argument, conducts assessment how employing modulate may jeopardize (i) responsiveness events core system values (ii) emotional component associated with altered memory. From first-person standpoint, changes way we reasonably feel react past future intentions be deemed ethically problematic as these profound yield disruptions negatively personal lives interpersonal relationships. In addition, discusses further conundrums third-person perspective inhibit social activism against structural injustices, thereby hindering societal progress. Thus, taking into account dimension is paramount when evaluating permissibility procedures.

Language: Английский

Citations

0