Unsophisticated AI coaching does not improve performance on symptom and performance validity tests in a Romanian sample of experimental feigners DOI Creative Commons

Samira Voin,

Iulia Crişan, Florin Alin Sava

et al.

Applied Neuropsychology Adult, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 8

Published: May 31, 2025

The present study aimed to investigate the ability of symptom and performance validity indicators detect experimental feigning with symptom-coaching vs. AI assistance. Fifty-nine undergraduates community members (45 females, MAge=22.6, SDAge=2.1; MEducation=14.5, SDEducation=1.4) were randomized into three groups: controls (n = 20), symptom-coached feigners AI-coached 19). two groups instructed feign a mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) for evading work responsibilities. All participants assessed online Inventory Problems-29 its memory module (IOP-29-M) Memory Objects Digits Examination Malingering Test (MODEMM). Results indicated that exaggerated symptomatology underperformed significantly more compared group. IOP-29-M MODEMM discriminated between control at previously reported cutoffs high sensitivities (.69-1.00) excellent specificities (.95-1.00). Our findings contribute nascent research on assistance, also providing proof concept accuracy in detecting feigning.

Language: Английский

Invalid Response Set, Malingering, and Related Assessments in Psychological Injury: Ethics, Causality, and Court DOI
Gerald Young, Luciano Giromini, László A. Erdődi

et al.

Psychological Injury and Law, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Jan. 31, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Unsophisticated AI coaching does not improve performance on symptom and performance validity tests in a Romanian sample of experimental feigners DOI Creative Commons

Samira Voin,

Iulia Crişan, Florin Alin Sava

et al.

Applied Neuropsychology Adult, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 8

Published: May 31, 2025

The present study aimed to investigate the ability of symptom and performance validity indicators detect experimental feigning with symptom-coaching vs. AI assistance. Fifty-nine undergraduates community members (45 females, MAge=22.6, SDAge=2.1; MEducation=14.5, SDEducation=1.4) were randomized into three groups: controls (n = 20), symptom-coached feigners AI-coached 19). two groups instructed feign a mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) for evading work responsibilities. All participants assessed online Inventory Problems-29 its memory module (IOP-29-M) Memory Objects Digits Examination Malingering Test (MODEMM). Results indicated that exaggerated symptomatology underperformed significantly more compared group. IOP-29-M MODEMM discriminated between control at previously reported cutoffs high sensitivities (.69-1.00) excellent specificities (.95-1.00). Our findings contribute nascent research on assistance, also providing proof concept accuracy in detecting feigning.

Language: Английский

Citations

0