Multi-parametric modeling of water treatment plant using AI-based non-linear ensemble DOI Open Access
Sani I. Abba, Vahid Nourani, Gözen Elkiran

et al.

Journal of Water Supply Research and Technology—AQUA, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 68(7), P. 547 - 561

Published: Oct. 22, 2019

Abstract In this research, general regression neural network (GRNN), Hammerstein-wiener (HW) and non-linear autoregressive with exogenous (NARX) network, least square support vector machine (LSSVM) models were employed for multi-parametric (Hardness (mg/L), turbidity (Turb) (μs/cm), pH suspended solid (SS) (mg/L)) modeling of Tamburawa water treatment plant (TWTP) at Kano, Nigeria. The weekly data from the TWTP used predictive evaluated based on several numerical indicators. Four different ensemble techniques (GRNN-E, HW-E, NARX-E, LSSVM-E) subsequently employed. comparison results showed that HW served as best model simulation Hardness, Turb, SS while NARX demonstrated high capability in predicting pH. Yet, system identification attained overall performance among four approaches. offers, therefore, a reliable intelligent approach treated should be explored tool TWTP. Among models, GRNN-E proved merit increased accuracy single significantly up to 30% Hardness 34% pH, 37% regards models.

Language: Английский

A survey on river water quality modelling using artificial intelligence models: 2000–2020 DOI
Tiyasha Tiyasha, Tran Minh Tung, Zaher Mundher Yaseen‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬

et al.

Journal of Hydrology, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 585, P. 124670 - 124670

Published: Feb. 14, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

528

A Review of the Artificial Neural Network Models for Water Quality Prediction DOI Creative Commons
Yingyi Chen, Lihua Song,

Yeqi Liu

et al.

Applied Sciences, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 10(17), P. 5776 - 5776

Published: Aug. 20, 2020

Water quality prediction plays an important role in environmental monitoring, ecosystem sustainability, and aquaculture. Traditional methods cannot capture the nonlinear non-stationarity of water well. In recent years, rapid development artificial neural networks (ANNs) has made them a hotspot prediction. We have conducted extensive investigation analysis on ANN-based from three aspects, namely feedforward, recurrent, hybrid architectures. Based 151 papers published 2008 to 2019, 23 types variables were highlighted. The primarily collected by sensor, followed specialist experimental equipment, such as UV-visible photometer, there is no mature sensor for measurement at present. Five different output strategies, Univariate-Input-Itself-Output, Univariate-Input-Other-Output, Multivariate-Input-Other(multi), Multivariate-Input-Itself-Other-Output, Multivariate-Input-Itself-Other (multi)-Output, are summarized. From results review, it can be concluded that ANN models capable dealing with modeling problems rivers, lakes, reservoirs, wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), groundwater, ponds, streams. many review articles useful researchers similar fields. Several new architectures presented study, recurrent structures, able improve future development.

Language: Английский

Citations

322

Monthly runoff time series prediction by variational mode decomposition and support vector machine based on quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization DOI
Zhong-kai Feng, Wen-jing Niu,

Zhengyang Tang

et al.

Journal of Hydrology, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 583, P. 124627 - 124627

Published: Jan. 29, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

212

Multi-step ahead modelling of river water quality parameters using ensemble artificial intelligence-based approach DOI

Gozen Elkiran,

Vahid Nourani, Sani I. Abba

et al.

Journal of Hydrology, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 577, P. 123962 - 123962

Published: July 18, 2019

Language: Английский

Citations

209

Improving streamflow prediction using a new hybrid ELM model combined with hybrid particle swarm optimization and grey wolf optimization DOI

Rana Muhammad Adnan,

Reham R. Mostafa, Özgür Kişi

et al.

Knowledge-Based Systems, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 230, P. 107379 - 107379

Published: Aug. 12, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

169

Modelling of daily lake surface water temperature from air temperature: Extremely randomized trees (ERT) versus Air2Water, MARS, M5Tree, RF and MLPNN DOI
Salim Heddam, Mariusz Ptak, Senlin Zhu

et al.

Journal of Hydrology, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 588, P. 125130 - 125130

Published: June 3, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

127

Emerging evolutionary algorithm integrated with kernel principal component analysis for modeling the performance of a water treatment plant DOI
Sani I. Abba, Quoc Bao Pham, A. G. Usman

et al.

Journal of Water Process Engineering, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 33, P. 101081 - 101081

Published: Dec. 20, 2019

Language: Английский

Citations

109

Water temperature forecasting based on modified artificial neural network methods: Two cases of the Yangtze River DOI

Rujian Qiu,

Yuankun Wang, Dong Wang

et al.

The Science of The Total Environment, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 737, P. 139729 - 139729

Published: May 30, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

86

Machine-learning methods for stream water temperature prediction DOI Creative Commons
Moritz Feigl, Katharina Lebiedzinski, Mathew Herrnegger

et al.

Hydrology and earth system sciences, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 25(5), P. 2951 - 2977

Published: May 31, 2021

Abstract. Water temperature in rivers is a crucial environmental factor with the ability to alter hydro-ecological as well socio-economic conditions within catchment. The development of modelling concepts for predicting river water and will be essential effective integrated management adaptation strategies future global changes (e.g. climate change). This study tests performance six different machine-learning models: step-wise linear regression, random forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), feed-forward neural networks (FNNs), two types recurrent (RNNs). All models are applied using data inputs daily prediction 10 Austrian catchments ranging from 200 96 000 km2 exhibiting wide range physiographic characteristics. evaluated input sets include combinations means air temperature, runoff, precipitation radiation. Bayesian optimization optimize hyperparameters all models. To make results comparable previous studies, widely used benchmark additionally: regression air2stream. With mean root squared error (RMSE) 0.55 ∘C, tested could significantly improve compared (1.55 ∘C) air2stream (0.98 ∘C). In general, show very similar models, median RMSE difference 0.08 ∘C between From both FNNs XGBoost performed best 4 catchments. RNNs best-performing largest catchment, indicating that mainly perform when processes long-term dependencies important. Furthermore, was observed hyperparameter showing importance optimization. Especially FNN model showed an extremely large standard deviation 1.60 due chosen hyperparameters. evaluates variables, training characteristics stream prediction, acting basis regional multi-catchment preprocessing steps implemented open-source R package wateRtemp provide easy access these approaches facilitate further research.

Language: Английский

Citations

86

Comparison of different methodologies for rainfall–runoff modeling: machine learning vs conceptual approach DOI

Rana Muhammad Adnan,

Andrea Petroselli‬, Salim Heddam

et al.

Natural Hazards, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 105(3), P. 2987 - 3011

Published: Jan. 2, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

71