Government fiscal decentralization and haze and carbon reduction: Evidence from the fiscal Province-Managing-County reform
Hong Xu,
No information about this author
Yukun Li,
No information about this author
Weifen Lin
No information about this author
et al.
Environmental Research,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
252, P. 119020 - 119020
Published: April 26, 2024
Language: Английский
Pollution havens in high-income emerging nations: Can green energy, financial development and environmental rules change this?
Xiaoqian Zhang,
No information about this author
Linglu Linjin
No information about this author
Energy Strategy Reviews,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
57, P. 101635 - 101635
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Political Economy of Mitigating Carbon Emissions with Mild Constraints: An Empirical Study on Employment Based on Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy
Politická ekonomie,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
73(1), P. 58 - 87
Published: Feb. 17, 2025
Language: Английский
Threshold Effect of Environmental Decentralization on Environmental Regulation and Carbon Emissions
Sustainability,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
17(7), P. 2853 - 2853
Published: March 24, 2025
Under
the
“dual
carbon”
targets,
influence
of
environmental
regulation
on
carbon
emissions
is
critical,
and
moderating
role
decentralization
should
not
be
overlooked.
Using
provincial
panel
data
from
China,
this
study
builds
a
Panel
Smooth
Transition
Regression
Model
(PSTR)
with
as
threshold
variable
to
examine
nonlinear
relationship
between
emissions.
The
finds
that
when
below
threshold,
raising
intensity
leads
significant
reduction
in
emissions;
however,
once
surpasses
strengthened
may
result
rise
Three
subcategories
exhibit
similar
effects,
but
their
direct
emission
effects
are
heterogeneous.
This
research
offers
empirical
evidence
supporting
optimization
distribution
responsibilities
across
central
local
governments,
well
for
formulating
regionally
differentiated
policies.
Language: Английский
Intellectual property rights, renewable energy innovation, and carbon emission reduction: Insights from China's provincial data
Ho‐kwang Mao,
No information about this author
Z. X. Qiao,
No information about this author
Gang Chen
No information about this author
et al.
Energy Strategy Reviews,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
59, P. 101705 - 101705
Published: April 18, 2025
Language: Английский
Empowering China's energy renaissance: Electrochemical storage strategies driving economic growth and policy evolution
Energy Strategy Reviews,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
55, P. 101533 - 101533
Published: Sept. 1, 2024
Language: Английский
Digital Inclusive Finance Drives Green Innovation: Pathways and Mechanisms for Sustainable Development
Journal of the Knowledge Economy,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Nov. 29, 2024
Language: Английский
Corporate political acuity and carbon - efficiency synergies
Yulong Sun,
No information about this author
Zhiwei Yang,
No information about this author
Weian Li
No information about this author
et al.
Journal of Environmental Management,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
359, P. 120914 - 120914
Published: April 25, 2024
Language: Английский
Carbon reduction through renewable energy and digitalization in emerging economies: Moderating role of public debt
Environmental Science and Pollution Research,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
31(30), P. 43096 - 43116
Published: June 18, 2024
Language: Английский
Does Climate Finance Really Affect Ecological Quality in Developing Countries? Fresh Evidence From the Method of Moments Quantile Regression Approach
International Journal of Finance & Economics,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Nov. 13, 2024
ABSTRACT
This
study
investigated
the
impact
of
climate
finance
on
ecological
footprint
(EF)
111
developing
countries
from
2002
to
2018
determine
its
real
effects
quality.
The
applied
method
moments
quantile
regression
(MMQR)
address
nonnormality,
individual
heterogeneity
EF
and
outliers.
Additionally,
connection
between
is
revisited,
considering
recipient
countries'
income
diversity
nature
finance.
In
addition,
analysis
repeated
by
splitting
sample
periods
into
2002–2009
2010–2018,
subject
COP15.
results
indicate
that
has
negative
significant
impacts
EFs
across
all
quantiles
(Q0.25,
Q0.5,
Q0.75
Q0.9),
inferring
robustly
improves
quality
countries.
These
findings
further
imply
mitigation
a
robust
effect
improving
distributions.
adaptation
heterogeneous
EFs,
positively
impacting
at
higher
quantiles.
Moreover,
depend
heterogeneity,
having
middle‐income
an
insignificant
low‐income
showed
positive
became
stronger
after
are
alternative
methods.
Policy
implications
suggested
based
findings.
Language: Английский