Operationalising the leverage points perspective for empirical research DOI
Maraja Riechers, Joern Fischer, Aisa O. Manlosa

et al.

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 57, P. 101206 - 101206

Published: Aug. 1, 2022

Language: Английский

A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations DOI Creative Commons
Simon West, L. Jamila Haider, Sanna Stålhammar

et al.

Ecosystems and People, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 16(1), P. 304 - 325

Published: Jan. 1, 2020

In sustainability science, revising the paradigms that separate humans from nature is considered a powerful 'leverage point' in pursuit of transformations. The coupled social-ecological and human-environment systems perspectives at heart science have, many ways, enhanced recognition across academic, civil, policy business spheres are inextricably connected. However, retaining substantialist assumptions where 'social' 'ecological' refer to different classes entity interact, insist on inextricability theory, while requiring researchers extricate them practice – thus inadvertently reproducing separation they seek repair. Consequently, increasingly drawing scholarship 'relational turn' humanities social sciences propose paradigm shift for science: away focusing interactions between entities, towards emphasizing continually unfolding processes relations. Yet there remains widespread uncertainty about origins, promises challenges using relational approaches. this paper, we identify four themes thinking processes; embodied experience; reconstructing language concepts; ethics/practices care highlight ways which these being drawn science. We conclude by critically discussing how approaches might contribute (i) (ii) transformations sustainability. Relational foster more dynamic, holistic accounts human-nature connectedness; situated diverse knowledges decision-making; new domains methods intervention nurture relationships place practice.

Language: Английский

Citations

328

Inside-out sustainability: The neglect of inner worlds DOI Creative Commons
Christopher D. Ives, Rebecca Freeth, Joern Fischer

et al.

AMBIO, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 49(1), P. 208 - 217

Published: April 24, 2019

In the context of continuing ecosystem degradation and deepening socio-economic inequality, sustainability scientists must question adequacy current scholarship practice. We argue that pre-occupation with external phenomena collective social structures has led to neglect people's 'inner worlds'-their emotions, thoughts, identities beliefs. These lie at heart actions for sustainability, have powerful transformative capacity system change. The condition inner worlds ought also be considered a dimension itself. Compassion, empathy generosity, example, are personal characteristics mark individual expressions sustainability. Sustainability science take life more seriously by considering how language shapes is shaped paradigms about world, prioritising enquiry into spirituality, contemplation transformation relate, encouraging scholars practitioners intentionally cultivate their strengthen resources necessary addressing challenges.

Language: Английский

Citations

263

Inner transformation to sustainability as a deep leverage point: fostering new avenues for change through dialogue and reflection DOI Creative Commons
C Woiwode, Niko Schäpke, Olívia Bina

et al.

Sustainability Science, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 16(3), P. 841 - 858

Published: Jan. 19, 2021

Abstract This article provides a rationale for inner transformation as key and hitherto underresearched dimension of sustainability transformations. Inner relates to various aspects human existence interactions such consciousness, mindsets, values, worldviews, beliefs, spirituality human–nature connectedness. The draws on Meadows’ leverage points approach, places intervene in system, reveal the relevance system change towards sustainability. Based insights from series dialogue reflection workshops literature review, this three important contributions transformations research: first, it increases our conceptual understanding its sustainability; second, outlines concrete elements transformation-sustainability nexus relation points; third, presents practical examples illustrating how work with supporting transformation. In sum, paper develops systematized structured approach transformation, including identification deep, i.e., highly influential, points. addition, critically discusses often contentious divergent perspectives shows related challenges. Finally, current developments research well further needs are identified.

Language: Английский

Citations

169

The contributions of resilience to reshaping sustainable development DOI
Belinda Reyers,

Michele‐Lee Moore,

L. Jamila Haider

et al.

Nature Sustainability, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 5(8), P. 657 - 664

Published: May 12, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

83

Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Tensions and prospects DOI Creative Commons
Christopher M. Raymond, Miguel A. Cebrián‐Piqueras, Erik Andersson

et al.

One Earth, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 5(3), P. 252 - 264

Published: March 1, 2022

The draft Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework commits to achievement of equity and justice outcomes represents a "relational turn" in how we understand inclusive conservation. Although "inclusivity" is drawn on as means engage diverse stakeholders, widening the framing inclusivity can create new tensions with regard manage protected areas. We first offer set that emerge light relational turn biodiversity Drawing global case examples applying multiple methods conservation, then demonstrate that, by actively engaging interdependent phases recognizing hybridity, enabling conditions for reflexivity partnership building, not only be acknowledged but softened and, some cases, reframed when managing biodiversity, equity, goals. results improve stakeholder engagement area management, ultimately supporting better implementation targets.

Language: Английский

Citations

81

Biodiesel Sustainability: Review of Progress and Challenges of Biodiesel as Sustainable Biofuel DOI Creative Commons
Ade Suhara,

Karyadi,

Safarudin Gazali Herawan

et al.

Clean Technologies, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 6(3), P. 886 - 906

Published: July 9, 2024

Biodiesel, an environmentally degradable and renewable biofuel derived from organic matter, has exhibited its capacity as a viable sustainable substitute for traditional diesel fuel. Numerous comprehensive investigations have been conducted to assess the effects of biodiesel on internal combustion engines (ICEs), with particular emphasis engine performance metrics, dynamics, emission profiles. Biodiesel demonstrates significant decrease in emissions particulate matter (PM), hydrocarbon (HC), carbon monoxide (CO) engines. The addition shown minor power output slight increase fuel consumption nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions. Nevertheless, extensive implementation biodiesel, despite potential effectively reduce detrimental emissions, encountered obstacles stemming external influences including restricted availability feedstock, volatile petroleum oil prices, inadequate governmental backing. This review presents concise summary advancements global adoption sustainability perspective. provides valuable insights into challenges opportunities associated advancement technologies by synthesizing current state palm examining trends implementation. wider can be facilitated addressing concerns pertaining feedstock availability, price stability, policy support. would allow realization environmental advantages contribute more friendly biofuel.

Language: Английский

Citations

26

Enabling new mindsets and transformative skills for negotiating and activating climate action: Lessons from UNFCCC conferences of the parties DOI Creative Commons
Christine Wamsler, Niko Schäpke, Carolin Fraude

et al.

Environmental Science & Policy, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 112, P. 227 - 235

Published: July 1, 2020

Technological and policy solutions for transitioning to a fossil-free society exist, many countries could afford the transition, rational arguments rapid climate action abound. Yet effective is still lacking. Dominant approaches have failed generate at anywhere near rate, scale or depth needed avoid potentially catastrophic futures. This despite 30 years of negotiations under United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), wide-ranging actions national, transnational sub-national levels. Practitioners scholars are, thus, increasingly arguing that also root causes problem must be addressed - mindset (or paradigm) out which emergency has arisen. Against this background, we investigate decision-makers' views need different inner qualities can support negotiating activating action, along with factors enable such shift. Data were collected during participatory workshops run 25th UNFCCC Conference Parties (COP25) in 2019, comprise surveys, as well social media communication semi-structured interviews COP attendees. Our results underline vast agreement among participants regarding shift new ways collaboration, based more relational modes knowing, being acting. They suggest emergence across sectors contexts, but not yet collective systems Finally, they highlight importance transformative skills experimental, safe spaces. The latter are seen visible manifestation enabler agency change through shared self-reflection, experience practice. We present framework, conclude further research needs recommendations.

Language: Английский

Citations

94

Leveraging Nature‐based Solutions for transformation: Reconnecting people and nature DOI Creative Commons
E. A. Welden, Alexandre Chausson, Marina Stavroula Melanidis

et al.

People and Nature, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 3(5), P. 966 - 977

Published: May 3, 2021

Abstract Nature‐based Solutions (NbS) have rapidly been gaining traction across the research, policy and practice spheres, advocated as transformative actions to jointly address biodiversity loss climate change. However, there are multiple, alternative ways conceptualize NbS those three spheres. To inform discourses in practice, we critically reflect on prevailing framing of NbS. Although concept links environmental health human well‐being, argue that its current dominant reinforces a dichotomy between people nature by highlighting one, external working for benefit society. For support transformation, believe it must embody reframing human–nature relationships towards regenerative humans nature. aspirations NbS, propose novel core making explicit co‐dependence nature, which underpins well‐being health. We highlight how such can transformation through influencing beliefs normative values, second, communication application practice. then elaborate is key inclusivity collaboration diverse research perspectives, objectives scales implementation practices deliver just successful A free Plain Language Summary be found within Supporting Information this article.

Language: Английский

Citations

83

Exiting the Anthropocene: Achieving personal and planetary health in the 21st century DOI Creative Commons
Susan L. Prescott,

Alan Logan,

Jamie Bristow

et al.

Allergy, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 77(12), P. 3498 - 3512

Published: June 24, 2022

Planetary health provides a perspective of ecological interdependence that connects the and vitality individuals, communities, Earth's natural systems. It includes social, political, economic ecosystems influence both individuals whole societies. In an era interconnected grand challenges threatening all systems at scales, planetary framework for cross-sectoral collaboration unified approaches to solutions. The field allergy is forefront these efforts. Allergic conditions are sentinel measure environmental impact on human in early life-illuminating how changes affect immune development predispose wider range inflammatory noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). This shows adverse macroscale ecology Anthropocene penetrates molecular level personal microscale ecology, including microbial foundations ecosystems. basis more integrated efforts address widespread degradation effects maladaptive urbanization, food systems, lifestyle behaviors, socioeconomic disadvantage. Nature-based solutions improve nature-relatedness crucial restoring symbiosis, balance, mutualism every sense, recognizing choices collective structural actions needed tandem. Ultimately, meaningful will depend placing greater emphasis psychological cultural dimensions such as mindfulness, values, moral wisdom ensure sustainable resilient future.

Language: Английский

Citations

52

Sustainable lifestyles: towards a relational approach DOI Creative Commons
Jessica Böhme,

Zack Walsh,

Christine Wamsler

et al.

Sustainability Science, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 17(5), P. 2063 - 2076

Published: March 17, 2022

Abstract The concept of sustainable lifestyles is said to have reached the limits its usefulness. As commonly understood, it impedes an effective response our increasingly complex world, and associated societal challenges. In this context, emerging paradigm relationality might offer a way forward renew current understanding approach. We explore possibility in study. First, we systematize if, how, dominant social represents barrier lifestyles. Second, analyze how relational approach could help overcome these barriers. On basis findings, develop Relational Lifestyle Framework (RLF). Our aim advance knowledge by illustrating are manifestation identified patterns thinking, being, acting that embedded today’s “socioecological” realities. RLF revitalizes field lifestyle change, as offers new for further reflection, provides directions policy transformation research.

Language: Английский

Citations

45