A(I)nimal-centred AI Jam: Design Fictions for Positive Multispecies Futures DOI
Alinta Krauth, Jason Nelson

Published: Dec. 4, 2023

Language: Английский

Ethics of using artificial intelligence (AI) in veterinary medicine DOI Creative Commons
Simon Coghlan, Thomas P. Quinn

AI & Society, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 39(5), P. 2337 - 2348

Published: May 10, 2023

Abstract This paper provides the first comprehensive analysis of ethical issues raised by artificial intelligence (AI) in veterinary medicine for companion animals. Veterinary is a socially valued service, which, like human medicine, will likely be significantly affected AI. AI raises some unique because nature client–patient–practitioner relationship, society’s relatively minimal valuation and protection nonhuman animals differences opinion about responsibilities to animal patients clients. The examines how these distinctive features influence ethics systems that might benefit clients, veterinarians patients—but also harm them. It offers practical guidance should interest ethicists, veterinarians, clinic owners, bodies regulators, technology developers researchers.

Language: Английский

Citations

15

Embodied human language models vs. Large Language Models, or why Artificial Intelligence cannot explain the modal be able to DOI
Sergio Torres–Martínez

Biosemiotics, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 17(1), P. 185 - 209

Published: Feb. 7, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

4

Digital Platforms, Privacy, and the Ethics of Wildlife Information Sharing DOI Creative Commons
Alan Rubel, Martin Kaehrle, Robert Streiffer

et al.

Philosophy & Technology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 38(1)

Published: Feb. 12, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Moor on Ethics for Emerging Technologies: Some Environmental Considerations DOI Creative Commons

John Weckert

Minds and Machines, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 35(2)

Published: March 15, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Control search rankings, control the world: what is a good search engine? DOI Creative Commons
Simon Coghlan, Hui Xian Chia, Falk Scholer

et al.

AI and Ethics, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: March 21, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Focal points and blind spots of human-centered AI: AI risks in written online media DOI Creative Commons
Marcell Sebestyén

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 12(1)

Published: April 23, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Mapping the individual, social and biospheric impacts of Foundation Models DOI Creative Commons
Andrés Domínguez Hernández, Shyam Krishna, Antonella Perini

et al.

2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 7, P. 776 - 796

Published: June 3, 2024

Responding to the rapid roll-out and large-scale commercialization of foundation models, large language generative AI, an emerging body work is shedding light on myriad impacts these technologies are having across society. Such research expansive, ranging from production discriminatory, fake toxic outputs, privacy copyright violations, unjust extraction labor natural resources. The same has not been case in some most prominent AI governance initiatives global north like UK's Safety Summit G7's Hiroshima process, which have influenced much international dialogue around governance. Despite wealth cautionary tales evidence algorithmic harm, there ongoing over-emphasis within discourse technical matters safety catastrophic or existential risks. This narrowed focus tended draw attention away very pressing social ethical challenges posed by current brute-force industrialization applications. To address such a visibility gap between real-world consequences speculative risks, this paper offers critical framework account for social, political, environmental dimensions models AI. Drawing review literature harms risks foundations insights data studies, science technology justice scholarship, we identify 14 categories map them according their individual, biospheric impacts. We argue that novel typology integrative perspective urgent negative downstream conclude with recommendations how could be used inform normative interventions advance responsible

Language: Английский

Citations

3

Helping and not Harming Animals with AI DOI Creative Commons
Simon Coghlan, Christine Parker

Philosophy & Technology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 37(1)

Published: Feb. 13, 2024

Abstract Ethical discussions about Artificial Intelligence (AI) often overlook its potentially large impact on nonhuman animals. In a recent commentary our paper AI’s possible harms, Leonie Bossert argues for focus not just the negative impacts but also beneficial outcomes of AI We welcome this call to increase awareness that helps animals: developing and using improve animal wellbeing promote positive dimensions in lives should be vital ethical goal. Nonetheless, we argue there is some value focusing technology-based harms context ethics policy discourses. A framework can inform strongest duties animals regulation risk assessment designed prevent serious humans, environment,

Language: Английский

Citations

2

Application of Artificial Intelligence in Monitoring of Animal Health and Welfare DOI Creative Commons
Ahmad Ali AlZubi,

Maha Al-Zu'bi

Indian Journal of Animal Research, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: Of

Published: Nov. 7, 2023

Blackground: With the advent of AI technology, great strides have been made in realm animal healthcare. This article delves into numerous uses veterinary medicine and demonstrates its revolutionary potential field. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms shown impressive skills illness detection, using medical imaging analysis to help veterinarians discover categorise diseases with greater accuracy efficiency. Furthermore, predictive analytics use various data sources, such as electronic health records genetic profiles, recognise trends forecast outbreaks, allowing remotely monitor vital signs act swiftly paving way for preventative measures individualised treatment. Methods: The purpose this is offer a synopsis many ways which artificial being used improve well-being animals. Understanding effects healthcare setting stage further development will be accomplished via an examination present state subject. Results: It evident that through mountains from studies clinical trials, helping speed up discovery novel treatments understanding health. A responsible useful application requires establishment ethical concerns, protection, regulatory frameworks. Method: document provides

Language: Английский

Citations

4

Dr. Doolittle uses AI: Ethical challenges of trying to speak whale DOI Creative Commons
Mark Ryan, Leonie N. Bossert

Biological Conservation, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 295, P. 110648 - 110648

Published: May 31, 2024

Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are increasingly used in conservation practices, e.g., to prevent poaching or inventory wildlife. Another area of application is using AI decode animal vocalisations understand better—and subsequently better protect—the animals. It has already been applied different species, including various whale species. Whales have complex that for sexual selection, coo their young, echolocation, and as a form communication. Scientists deploying underwater microphones (hydrophones), robotic fish, tags record vocalisation. identify vocalisation patterns, meaning, digitally recreate these sounds communicate with them. Understanding translating into something humanly understandable aims at helping movements protect them from ship strikes bycatch reduce sonar interferes echolocation. Using holds potential benefits, but it also comes several risks. We describe current projects use decipher the humpback sperm whales (Section 3). introduce six ethical challenges applying highlight what needs be addressed establish practices responsibly 4). These anthropomorphism, privacy rights, cultural emotional harm whales, technological solutionism, ineffectiveness conservation, gender bias. This paper critically evaluates analyse vocalisation, concluding many benefits conservation; however, try speak ethically problematic because emotional, physical, caused whales.

Language: Английский

Citations

1