Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 207, P. 107821 - 107821
Published: Dec. 23, 2019
Language: Английский
Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 207, P. 107821 - 107821
Published: Dec. 23, 2019
Language: Английский
Nature Reviews Disease Primers, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 7(1)
Published: Feb. 25, 2021
Language: Английский
Citations
314The Lancet, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 394(10208), P. 1580 - 1590
Published: Oct. 1, 2019
Language: Английский
Citations
291The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 45(6), P. 644 - 663
Published: Oct. 11, 2019
Background: The past decade has seen unprecedented shifts in the cannabis policy environment, and public health impacts of these changes will hinge on how they affect patterns use harms associated with other substances.Objectives: To review existing research state substance use, emphasizing studies using methods for causal inference highlighting gaps our understanding evolving markets.Methods: Narrative quasi-experimental medical laws (MCLs) recreational (RCLs) disorders, as well or from alcohol, opioids, tobacco.Results: Research suggests MCLs increase adult but not adolescent provisions less regulated supply may disorders. These reduce some opioid-related harms, while their alcohol tobacco remain uncertain. RCLs is just emerging, findings suggest little impact prevalence potential increases college student unknown effects use.Conclusions: influence advanced importance heterogeneity policies, populations, market dynamics, relate to often ignore factors. Understanding requires greater attention differences short- versus long-term laws, nuances policies consumption, careful consideration appropriate control groups.
Language: Английский
Citations
248Addictive Behaviors, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 109, P. 106479 - 106479
Published: May 20, 2020
Language: Английский
Citations
222Neuropharmacology, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 193, P. 108610 - 108610
Published: May 16, 2021
Language: Английский
Citations
70Addiction, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 117(7), P. 1857 - 1870
Published: Jan. 19, 2022
Abstract Background Cannabis is among the most consumed psychoactive substances world‐wide. Considering changing policy trends regarding substance, it crucial to understand more clearly its potential acute and residual adverse effects from a public health viewpoint. Cognitive function one of targeted areas with conflicting findings. This meta‐review measured magnitude cannabis on cognition in adolescents adults provided by meta‐analyses evaluated quality evidence. Methods A systematic search was performed PubMed, PsycINFO, Web Science Google Scholar. Meta‐analyses were included if they quantitatively examined performances users general population cognitive tasks. Results The retrieved 10 eligible (71 sizes, n = 43 761) evidence ranging low moderate quality, which categorized into domains functions: executive functions ( k 7), learning memory 5), attention 4), processing speed perceptual motor 2) language 2). Verbal displayed robust impaired intoxication that persisted after passed. Small‐to‐moderate reported for functioning. use led small deficits inhibitory processes flexibility, whereas small‐to‐moderate working decision‐making. Evidence has shown administration induced neurocognitive observed heavy cannabis‐using youths. showed no significant difference between non‐users language, simple skills. Conclusion Meta‐analytical data have leads several domains. These impairments accord documented effects, suggesting detrimental persist beyond intake.
Language: Английский
Citations
70JAMA Psychiatry, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 78(9), P. 1013 - 1013
Published: July 21, 2021
Cannabis use and potency of cannabis have increased during the past 2 decades. If association between schizophrenia is causal, this should be reflected in an increase proportion cases being attributable to cannabis, population-attributable risk fraction (PARF).To determine whether PARF for disorder has over time.This nationwide, register-based historical prospective cohort study included all people Denmark born before December 31, 2000, who were alive 16 years or older at some point from January 1, 1972, 2016. Data analysis was performed August 2020 April 2021.Diagnosis disorder.Diagnosis schizophrenia, with estimated 1972 2016.A total 7 186 834 individuals analysis, including 3 595 910 women (50.0%) 590 924 men (50.0%). The adjusted hazard ratio fluctuated approximately 4 (with 95% CIs ranging 6) throughout most period when diagnosed compared those without disorder. also fluctuated, but clear evidence 1995 (when relatively stable around 2.0%, a CI 0.3% either side) until reaching stability 6.0% 8.0% 0.5% since 2010.The results these longitudinal analyses show associated 3- 4-fold decades, which expected given previously described increases cannabis. This finding important ramifications regarding legalization control
Language: Английский
Citations
64Substance Use & Misuse, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 57(7), P. 1052 - 1061
Published: April 18, 2022
Introductions: In the United States (US), support for cannabis legalization has increased over time. This study examines historical changes in attitudes and period-specific individual external influences on these.Methods A systematic search was conducted publications PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO up to October 2019. Six studies with a regionally or nationally representative adult US-based populations were included. secondary analysis using data from National Survey of Drug Use Health. Hierarchical age-period-cohort assessed trends perceived harmfulness availability between 1996 2018. Ecological comparisons made these perceptions time.Results steep growth began 1990s continued grow relatively linear manner. Most people developed more liberal views, no evidence that within any one sociodemographic group disproportionately responsible overall attitudinal change. Increases proportion who use cannabis, non-religious population political liberalism may partially explain legalization. The decline as reflected media, have contributed However, remained stable despite significant relaxations regulations.Conclusions US become accepting change is related risks benefits use, influenced by broader cultural period.
Language: Английский
Citations
44American Journal of Public Health, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 110(3), P. 357 - 362
Published: Dec. 19, 2019
To use publicly accessible data from people who post to Twitter rapidly capture and describe the public's recent experiences with cannabis.
Language: Английский
Citations
73Frontiers in Psychiatry, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 11
Published: Sept. 16, 2020
There has been a shift surrounding societal and legal perspectives on cannabis reflecting changing public attitudes towards the perceived safety social acceptability of use. With liberalization internationally, focus most cannabis-related harms effects with users themselves. Harm-to-others including injuries from violence have nevertheless unfortunately largely overlooked. While studies remain heterogeneous, there is meta-analytical evidence pointing an association. The aims this focused review are two-fold: (I) meta-analyses association between violence; (II) provide overview possible mechanisms relating use to violence. First, in youths, intimate partners individuals severe mental disorders shown that global moderate violence, which stronger latter more at-risk population. Preliminary data even highlighted potential dose-response relationship larger frequent users. Although importance, subject remained essentially forgotten as health concern. literature remains inconclusive, suggested increases following policies. This may increase violent outcomes if effect directly related by means its psychophysiological modifications. However, for moment, associating be clearly resolved. Considering recency policy changes cannabis, further methodologically sound research using longitudinal designs should examine different forms trends emerge, while evaluating confounding factors (e.g. other substance use). In addition, evidence-based associated measures must taken mitigate risks.
Language: Английский
Citations
56