Evaluation of Necessity of Routine Luteal Phase Support After Ovarian Stimulation by Oral Ovulogen in Intrauterine Insemination Cycles DOI
Pooja Gupta, Rashmi Sharma,

Faazal Rehman

et al.

Fertility Science and Research, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 12, P. 8 - 8

Published: April 7, 2025

Objectives Assisted reproductive technology aims to achieve superovulation receive optimum outcomes. Resulting supraphysiological estradiol levels cause luteal phase defect due feedback inhibition of FSH and LH. During intrauterine insemination, this mechanism is seldom seen. Thus, routine use progesterone in clinical practice adds burden medication cost without much evidence recommend it. The objective was evaluate the utility support with IUI cycles stimulated by oral ovulogens. Material methods A total 200 women attending infertility OPD were randomly selected as per inclusion criteria (Unexplained infertility, Mild male factor, Donor sperm IUI, PCOD, Coital factors, endometriosis) whereas those factors like Age more than or equal 38 years, thin endometrium, previous two failures, history suggestive defect-short phase, premenstrual spotting, premature rupture follicles, presence structural uterine anomaly, History endocrine autoimmune diseases excluded from study. After a baseline transvaginal examnination, they underwent ovarian stimulation day 2 6 ovulogen, letrozole (2.5 mg) followed Follicular study protocol HCG trigger given 10000 I.U s/c once dominant follicle develioped timed at 36–44 hours after only confirmation on USG. Patients divided into groups. Group included absent B tab dydrogesterone. Conception, if any, reported positive urine pregnancy test kits confirmed serum Beta measured mIU/ml. Results Among cases, 23% had test.Whereas, controls 21% test, difference being statistically non-significant p value = 0.733. Clinical rate marker successful outcome present 22%.Of cases controls, although 0.755. Conclusion Luteal progesterones makes no significant ovulogen cycles.

Language: Английский

Terapia del fattore maschile di infertilità DOI Creative Commons
Giuseppe Grande, Raffaele Scafa, Andrea Graziani

et al.

L Endocrinologo, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: April 24, 2025

Sommario La diagnosi di infertilità richiede un approccio multidisciplinare che includa entrambi i partner, al fine individuare le cause e fornire opzioni terapeutiche più appropriate, limitando quando possibile il ricorso a procedure invasive costose non necessarie. In particolare, completo iter diagnostico per fattore maschile (MFI) permette classificare pazienti in una o delle seguenti classi diagnostiche: infezioni infiammazioni ghiandole sessuali accessorie; ostruzione/agenesia dei dotti/eiaculazione retrograda; danno testicolare primitivo; disfunzione secondaria; varicocele; alterazioni idiopatiche del liquido seminale; inspiegata. relazione quadro base, dunque, possono essere realizzati trattamenti eziologici empirici, sono oggetto seguente articolo. Gli antibiotici costituiscono trattamento principale batteriche. terapia dovrebbe basata sull’identificazione patogeno sulla determinazione della sensibilità agli tramite antibiogramma. caso leucocitospermia presenza altri segni infiammatori livello seminale ecografico, senza isolamento patogeni, si può adottare empirica con farmaci antinfiammatori steroidei corticosteroidi, somministrati via orale transrettale. gonadotropine rappresenta la maggior evidenza efficacia nel campo MFI. Classicamente, viene utilizzata nell’ipogonadismo ipogonadotropo, ottima risposta sia termini miglioramento parametri seminali, gravidanza spontanea. Sulla base tali presupposti, da molti anni è stata proposta FSH paziente infertile, oligozoospermia e/o astenozoospermia, livelli inferiori 8 UI/L assenza ostruttivo vie seminali. tale situazione induce significativo numero motilità degli spermatozoi tasso gravidanze spontanee tecniche procreazione medicalmente assistita. I selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) gli inibitori dell’aromatasi (IAs) rappresentano possibili terapie off-label, seppure loro utilizzo supportato forti evidenze uso consigliato dalle recenti linee guida. Peraltro, tutti studi concordi nell’evidenziare come associ ulteriore incremento FSH, suggerendo quindi strategia iperstimolatoria potrebbe associarsi seminali anche superiore UI/L. Pur essendo varicocele molto frequente nella popolazione generale nei soggetti infertili, sua valenza clinica management dell’infertilità ridotta. reale causa rappresenta, pertanto, esclusione, considerare soprattutto numerose grosse ectasie venose reflusso significativamente aumentato, altre note infertilità. L’uso integratori nutraceutici migliorare fertilità argomento ancora dibattuto. Le attuali guida ribadiscono indicata prescrizione prima realizzazione percorso diagnostico. Al contempo, sfida ambito rimane personalizzazione, evidence-based condizioni associate stress ossidativo.

Citations

0

Pharmacogenetics of follicle‐stimulating hormone action in the male DOI Creative Commons
Andrea Graziani, Giuseppe Grande,

Raffele Scafa

et al.

Andrology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: April 30, 2025

Abstract Male factor infertility (MFI) is involved in half of the cases couple infertility. The follicle‐stimulating hormone (FSH) therapy considered efficient to improve semen parameters and pregnancy rate patients with idiopathic MFI, following lesson learned from hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. However, while hypogonadism FSH therapy, combination human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), a well‐established treatment, MFI effects are variable unpredictable. should be personalized tailored on characteristics male patient couple. pivotal aspect accurate identification who might benefit such treatment (responders) those not (nonresponders). To date, selection treated based history, physical examination, analysis, hormonal assessment. these cannot adequately identify priori responder patients. Furthermore, management include pharmacological adaptation (dosage duration therapy), as happens during ovarian hyperstimulation assisted reproductive technologies. In fully pharmacogenetic factors must considered. this paper, we describe evidence dealing pharmacogenetics presenting physiological physiopathological basis studies polymorphisms beta‐subunit ( FSHB ) receptor FSHR gene. According so far available, genetic evaluation recommended only for research purposes, since data conclusive even contrasting. derived quite small different endpoints relatively few cases. Better that consider combined effect several gene polymorphisms, together clinical, biochemical, seminal testicular cytology, necessary develop an algorithm predict response treatment.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Evaluation of Necessity of Routine Luteal Phase Support After Ovarian Stimulation by Oral Ovulogen in Intrauterine Insemination Cycles DOI
Pooja Gupta, Rashmi Sharma,

Faazal Rehman

et al.

Fertility Science and Research, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 12, P. 8 - 8

Published: April 7, 2025

Objectives Assisted reproductive technology aims to achieve superovulation receive optimum outcomes. Resulting supraphysiological estradiol levels cause luteal phase defect due feedback inhibition of FSH and LH. During intrauterine insemination, this mechanism is seldom seen. Thus, routine use progesterone in clinical practice adds burden medication cost without much evidence recommend it. The objective was evaluate the utility support with IUI cycles stimulated by oral ovulogens. Material methods A total 200 women attending infertility OPD were randomly selected as per inclusion criteria (Unexplained infertility, Mild male factor, Donor sperm IUI, PCOD, Coital factors, endometriosis) whereas those factors like Age more than or equal 38 years, thin endometrium, previous two failures, history suggestive defect-short phase, premenstrual spotting, premature rupture follicles, presence structural uterine anomaly, History endocrine autoimmune diseases excluded from study. After a baseline transvaginal examnination, they underwent ovarian stimulation day 2 6 ovulogen, letrozole (2.5 mg) followed Follicular study protocol HCG trigger given 10000 I.U s/c once dominant follicle develioped timed at 36–44 hours after only confirmation on USG. Patients divided into groups. Group included absent B tab dydrogesterone. Conception, if any, reported positive urine pregnancy test kits confirmed serum Beta measured mIU/ml. Results Among cases, 23% had test.Whereas, controls 21% test, difference being statistically non-significant p value = 0.733. Clinical rate marker successful outcome present 22%.Of cases controls, although 0.755. Conclusion Luteal progesterones makes no significant ovulogen cycles.

Language: Английский

Citations

0