
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 50, P. 101571 - 101571
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Language: Английский
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 50, P. 101571 - 101571
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Language: Английский
Health information science, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 155 - 182
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0Communications in computer and information science, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 61 - 79
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0Elsevier eBooks, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 263 - 287
Published: Jan. 1, 2022
Language: Английский
Citations
17Cureus, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: May 1, 2023
During the early phase of COVID-19 pandemic, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing faced limitations, prompting exploration machine learning (ML) alternatives for diagnosis and prognosis. Providing a comprehensive appraisal such decision support systems their use in management can aid medical community making informed decisions during risk assessment patients, especially low-resource settings. Therefore, objective this study was to systematically review studies that predicted or severity disease using ML. Following Preferred Reporting Items Systematic Reviews Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), we conducted literature search MEDLINE (OVID), Scopus, EMBASE, IEEE Xplore from January 1 June 31, 2020. The outcomes were prognostic measures as death, need mechanical ventilation, admission, acute respiratory distress syndrome. We included peer-reviewed observational studies, clinical trials, research letters, case series, reports. extracted data about study's country, setting, sample size, source, dataset, diagnostic outcomes, prediction measures, type ML model, accuracy. Bias assessed Prediction model Risk Of ASsessment Tool (PROBAST). This registered International Prospective Register (PROSPERO), with number CRD42020197109. final records extraction 66. Forty-three (64%) used secondary data. majority Chinese authors (30%). Most (79%) relied on chest imaging prediction, while remainder various laboratory indicators, including hematological, biochemical, immunological markers. Thirteen explored predicting severity, rest diagnosis. Seventy percent articles deep models, 30% traditional algorithms. reported high sensitivity, specificity, accuracy models (exceeding 90%). overall concern bias "unclear" 56% studies. mainly due concerns selection bias. may help identify patients particularly context imaging. Although these reflect exhibit accuracy, novelty biases dataset make them replacement clinicians' cognitive decision-making questionable. Continued is needed enhance robustness reliability
Language: Английский
Citations
10Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 50, P. 101571 - 101571
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
3